Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

examples test compile optional verbose #10301

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 9, 2019

Conversation

alekla01
Copy link
Contributor

@alekla01 alekla01 commented Apr 3, 2019

Description

add examples test compile verbose cmd argument.

Pull request type

[ ] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[x] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

Release Notes

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from a team April 3, 2019 11:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

ciarmcom commented Apr 3, 2019

@alekla01, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-tools @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ def compile_repos(config, toolchains, targets, profile, examples):
valid_choices(example['toolchains'], toolchains),
example['features']):
print("Compiling %s for %s, %s" % (name, target, toolchain))
build_command = ["mbed-cli", "compile", "-t", toolchain, "-m", target, "-v"]
build_command = ["python", "-m", "mbed", "compile", "-t", toolchain, "-m", target] + (['-v'] if verbose else [])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change is not explained in the commit message or in the Pull Request description. Could you please explain why you added python -m to the beginning of this command?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed.

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Apr 4, 2019

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 13 of 13 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Apr 5, 2019

@adbridge I would like your review for this changeset

Copy link
Contributor

@adbridge adbridge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants