Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testing with ember-cli-page-object v2.0.0-beta.3 #36

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 23, 2022
Merged

Conversation

DanMonroe
Copy link
Contributor

@DanMonroe DanMonroe commented Feb 4, 2022

This PR is intended our efforts to get ember-table compatible with Ember v4.

Changes include:

Perhaps we could release a beta version of this addon while we wait for a release version of v2 of ember-cli-page-object

@DanMonroe DanMonroe marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2022 16:43
@DanMonroe DanMonroe requested review from kpfefferle and a team February 16, 2022 18:09
Copy link
Member

@kpfefferle kpfefferle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest that we merge this to master and release it as an 0.8.0-beta for the ember-table 4.0-beta branch to use? Then when ember-cli-page-object releases a 2.0 stable, we can upgrade to that, release an 0.8 stable here, and then leverage that in the new version of ember-table?

It looks like @mixonic and @twokul have NPM publish permissions for this addon, so hopefully one of them can review/merge this and get a release cut?

Copy link
Contributor

@twokul twokul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small comment, but lgtm overally!

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Node Modules Cache
uses: actions/cache@v2
with:
path: '**/node_modules'
path: "**/node_modules"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems we use single quotes in this file. Why the change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reverted.

@DanMonroe DanMonroe merged commit a5e1c58 into master Feb 23, 2022
@twokul twokul deleted the monroe/v2 branch February 23, 2022 14:32
@twokul
Copy link
Contributor

twokul commented Feb 23, 2022

Going to publish beta today

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants