Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closes #5165: Better separation for crafting and processing patterns #5485

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 10, 2021

Conversation

yueh
Copy link
Member

@yueh yueh commented Oct 6, 2021

Both are now their own item id with their own name.
Distinct textures will come later
Update pattern terminal to better reflect the concept of a primary
output. Needs further documentation/hints.
Sorted translations to group related entries together.

@yueh yueh added the api API related, most notably to indicate potential breaks label Oct 6, 2021
@yueh yueh added this to the 9.0.0-alpha - 1.17 milestone Oct 6, 2021
@yueh yueh marked this pull request as draft October 7, 2021 13:10
@yueh yueh marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2021 17:26
yueh and others added 3 commits October 10, 2021 12:22
Both are now their own item id with their own name.
Distinct textures will come later
Update pattern terminal to better reflect the concept of a primary
output. Needs further documentation/hints.
… used it to show tooltips for the pattern terminal processing slots.
shartte and others added 3 commits October 10, 2021 13:53
…using the same item registered twice. Remove the ability to "re-encode" an existing pattern. They need to be replaced to allow switching types.
@Technici4n Technici4n self-requested a review October 10, 2021 18:42
@shartte shartte merged commit 1381eab into master Oct 10, 2021
@shartte shartte deleted the feature-5165 branch October 10, 2021 18:45
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 9, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
api API related, most notably to indicate potential breaks
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants