Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: explicitly set readOnly to true #308

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2024
Merged

fix: explicitly set readOnly to true #308

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2024

Conversation

kevinperaza
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • fix: explicitly set readOnly to true

Testing required outside of automated testing?

  • Not Applicable

Screenshots (if appropriate):

  • Not Applicable

Rollback / Rollforward Procedure

  • Roll Forward
  • Roll Back

Reviewer Checklist

  • Description of Change
  • Description of outside testing if applicable.
  • Description of Roll Forward / Backward Procedure
  • Documentation updated for Change

@kevinperaza kevinperaza requested a review from a team as a code owner January 3, 2024 14:47
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 3, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
developers-basistheory-com ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 3, 2024 2:48pm

@kevinperaza kevinperaza merged commit f33965f into master Jan 3, 2024
3 checks passed
@kevinperaza kevinperaza deleted the eng-4807-2 branch January 3, 2024 14:50
bt-platform-eng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
## [1.120.1](v1.120.0...v1.120.1) (2024-01-03)

### Bug Fixes

* explicitly set readOnly to ([#308](#308)) ([f33965f](f33965f))
@bt-platform-eng
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.120.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants