Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: drop usage of :has selector #64

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2023
Merged

fix: drop usage of :has selector #64

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2023

Conversation

kevinperaza
Copy link
Contributor

@kevinperaza kevinperaza commented Feb 9, 2023

Description

  • drop usage of :has selector
  • rename classes for clarity

Testing required outside of automated testing?

  • Not Applicable

Screenshots (if appropriate):

image

image

  • Not Applicable

Rollback / Rollforward Procedure

  • Roll Forward
  • Roll Back

Reviewer Checklist

  • Description of Change
  • Description of outside testing if applicable.
  • Description of Roll Forward / Backward Procedure
  • Documentation updated for Change

refactor: rename classes for clarity
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 9, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
developers-basistheory-com ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 9, 2023 at 11:27PM (UTC)

@kevinperaza kevinperaza marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2023 23:29
@kevinperaza kevinperaza requested a review from a team as a code owner February 9, 2023 23:29
@kevinperaza kevinperaza merged commit 8bc8788 into master Feb 10, 2023
@kevinperaza kevinperaza deleted the eng-4116 branch February 10, 2023 14:36
bt-platform-eng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
## [1.25.2](v1.25.1...v1.25.2) (2023-02-10)

### Bug Fixes

* drop usage of :has selector ([#64](#64)) ([8bc8788](8bc8788))
@bt-platform-eng
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.25.2 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants