[avalanche] show block heights in orange if they don't have enough confirmations for a proof #221
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This make the warning show also when building a proof from coin details file, when previouly the check was only done for coins selected in the UTXO list.
…ugh confirmations A UTXO must have 2016 confirmations to be used in a valid proof. Put the block height in orange and explain why in the tooltip. The reason for using orange instead of red is that the proof will eventually become valid. Users might know what they are doing when they build the proof in advance of it being usable.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A UTXO must have 2016 confirmations to be used in a valid proof. Put the block height in orange and explain why in the tooltip.
The reason for using orange instead of red is that the proof will eventually become valid. Users might know what they are doing when they build the proof in advance of it being usable.