Show diff from clang-format. #1373
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Compiler PytketIBMQ is best, or equal best on, 14.912280701754383% for circuits. |
1 similar comment
|
Compiler PytketIBMQ is best, or equal best on, 14.912280701754383% for circuits. |
|
Compiler PytketIBMQ is best, or equal best on, 14.912280701754383% for circuits. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Previously the formatting check would fail without indicating exactly what was wrong. This PR makes it print a diff which the developer can then apply to their branch to fix the issues.
This became necessary since clang-format began changing its rules on updates to minor versions that are not easily available on all platforms.
Also actually fix the latest formatting errors.
Checklist