Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase size of default dither? #64

Closed
hamogu opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #72
Closed

Increase size of default dither? #64

hamogu opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #72

Comments

@hamogu
Copy link
Member

hamogu commented Nov 20, 2023

From Scott Wolk:

for all ACIS observations (including TG) we moved from 8"x8" to 16x"16"
starting cycle 25 and for some cycle 24 observations.

We started using this occasionally with the PEA Patch ~ May 18. It is now the default for Cycle 25.

From the POG:
6.12 Dither
Unless specially requested, the spacecraft is dithered in a Lissajous pattern during all observations. For observations with ACIS, the default dither pattern now spans 32 arcsec peak to peak in both the Y and Z directions. Note that for subarrays smaller than 126 pixels, the dither spans 32 arcsec peak to peak in the long direction, but only 16 arcsec peak to peak in the short direction. The dither serves two purposes: (1) to provide some exposure in the gaps between the CCDs, and (2) to smooth out pixel-to-pixel variations in the response. The effect of dither is removed during high-level ground processing of the data. The exposure time in the gaps between chips (and at the outside edges) will be less than that for the remainder of the field. Default dither parameters are listed in Table 5.4.

hamogu added a commit to hamogu/marx that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2023
Starting in cycle 25, Chandra moved to a larger dither pattern for ACIS by default.
This changes the defaults in marx.par to match those ACIS patterns.
See: https://cxc.harvard.edu/proposer/POG/html/chap5.html#tb:dither

fixes Chandra-MARX#64
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant