Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EVA-3322 - refactor #48

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

tcezard
Copy link
Member

@tcezard tcezard commented Sep 26, 2023

In this proposal I moved all the function that can only be used within EVA to the ebi_eva_internal_pyutils folder.
I also created a list of additional dependencies that are required to use the internal functions
This will make it clear which package require the additional dependencies and which do not.
However it still requires a fair amount of refactoring in the code that uses the internal functions.

Copy link
Contributor

@apriltuesday apriltuesday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this approach makes sense to me, hopefully will encourage us to think more about how we use our internal vs. truly publicly available resources, in addition to the stripped down dependency set for eva-sub-cli...

It's true that it causes some hassle in refactoring/renaming (if we've pinned versions we can at least do it on an as-needed basis?), so if other people think it's not worth the trade-off that would be okay as well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

config_utils needs to be in internal as well

@tcezard tcezard changed the title EVA - 3322 - refactor EVA-3322 - refactor Sep 29, 2023
@tcezard tcezard merged commit 8cb66b2 into EBIvariation:master Oct 5, 2023
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants