Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release version 0.19.0 #85

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2024
Merged

Release version 0.19.0 #85

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

fornwall
Copy link
Contributor

@fornwall fornwall commented Apr 3, 2024

Release 0.19 containing the update to ash version 0.38 as the only change: #83

@fornwall fornwall requested a review from VZout as a code owner April 3, 2024 12:42
@fornwall fornwall requested review from Jake-Shadle and fu5ha and removed request for VZout April 3, 2024 12:52
@Jake-Shadle Jake-Shadle merged commit c1eb808 into main Apr 3, 2024
5 checks passed
@Jake-Shadle Jake-Shadle deleted the fornwall/release-0.19 branch April 3, 2024 13:13
@@ -64,6 +68,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0

<!-- next-url -->
[Unreleased]: https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/ash-molten/compare/0.18.0...HEAD
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[Unreleased]: https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/ash-molten/compare/0.18.0...HEAD
[Unreleased]: https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/ash-molten/compare/0.19.0...HEAD

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Created #86 for that.

[advisories]
ignore = [
# Unmtaintained `safemem` dependency - only used by plist to build
"RUSTSEC-2023-0081",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the CI have checked against unused advisories?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be nice if cargo-deny did that, but I don't think it supports that now.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm pretty sure we've set up cargo-deny such that it warns on allowed/ignored things that are no longer triggered in the first place (both for advisories as well as skipping crates).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants