feat:add a label for kcc resource type

[xiaoweim]

This PR adds a default label to KCC resource object specifying the resource type.

I would like to have a label in concord usage tables that helps me attribute the resource usage to the exact KCC resource. In order to concord to be able to get this information, we first need a label in KCC so that I can later add a label in concord with this information.

[xiaoweim]

/assign @cheftako
/assign @justinsb

[yuwenma]

Do we want to add the Kind name in the KCC metadata labels as well? This is a duplicate of the Kind field itself, my concern is that this could bug some users.

[google-oss-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from cheftako. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[justinsb]

Yeah, can you describe more what we're trying to achieve here. AIUI the GCP resource implies the KCC resource, so I'm not sure what we're adding? We have the managed-by-cnrm GCP label already if we want to know if the resource is managed by KCC

[xiaoweim]

Yeah, can you describe more what we're trying to achieve here. AIUI the GCP resource implies the KCC resource, so I'm not sure what we're adding? We have the managed-by-cnrm GCP label already if we want to know if the resource is managed by KCC

Essentially I would like to have a label in concord usage tables that helps me attribute the resource usage to the exact KCC resource. In order to concord to be able to get this information, we first need a label in KCC so that I can later add a label in concord with this information.

[xiaoweim]

Do we want to add the Kind name in the KCC metadata labels as well? This is a duplicate of the Kind field itself, my concern is that this could bug some users.

So I am adding this label to pass this information to concord usage tables, not sure if KCC metadata label is needed or can do the same?

[cheftako]

Seems like some types (Eg CloudSQLInstance) are not being labelled today.

[cheftako]

Otherwise looks good.