software_spec: no _or_later in bottle filenames.
#1446
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's more useful to be able to "bless" an existing bottle to be used on later OSs (e.g. where it cannot yet be built) than it is to have to create a new, identical bottle just to have a different filename.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's more useful to be able to "bless" an existing bottle to be used on later OSs (e.g. where it cannot yet be built) than it is to have to create a new, identical bottle just to have a different filename.
This will be used to be able to add bottles that can be used on Sierra (after testing) to formulae
that cannot build there yet.