Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Support nested unions in typedUnion #2693

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

FrederikBolding
Copy link
Member

Add support for nested unions in typedUnion. The structs will be flattened before validation occurs.

Progresses #2692

@FrederikBolding FrederikBolding requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2024 11:48
@FrederikBolding
Copy link
Member Author

@metamaskbot update-pr

Mrtenz
Mrtenz previously approved these changes Sep 3, 2024
@FrederikBolding FrederikBolding merged commit 5f82540 into main Sep 3, 2024
154 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.30%. Comparing base (bd23ab7) to head (ea2677e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2693   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.30%   94.30%           
=======================================
  Files         481      481           
  Lines       10041    10045    +4     
  Branches     1512     1515    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         9469     9473    +4     
  Misses        572      572           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@FrederikBolding FrederikBolding deleted the fb/support-nested-unions-in-typedunion branch September 3, 2024 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants