-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ORC encrypted write should fallback to CPU [databricks] #5604
Merged
razajafri
merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:branch-22.06
from
razajafri:SP-5463-ORC-encrypted-writes
Jun 2, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does it make sense to try to gset the provider to something else to be able to test behavior on DB?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried setting it to
test:///
which is what spark sets in their test code, but that doesn't work.I am following the Spark teams lead on just skipping these tests although their tests are in Scala so they have control over skipping it only if the provider doesn't have test keys. I am just skipping them for DB10.4 only.
Edit: Sorry, I meant setting the provider URL to
test:///
. Let me try to set the provider to one of the options and seeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other combinations of the conf have resulted in similar errors
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what type of errors? Are you implying that we can't use encryption on databricks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, I am not saying DB doesn't support encryption but when I set the provider to
unknown
I get errors saying that the provider is required. When I set it tohadoop
I get the following errorIf I set it to
aws
I get the error that the provider url is unreachable or something along those lines. I imagine an encryption server needs to be setup before encryption can be actually tested on DB.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok lets leave it as skip for 22.06, can you file a follow on issue to see if we can find a way to test on db 10.4. We can discuss on the issue to see if we think its needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is the follow-on. Please add to the issue or comment on it if something needs to be added
#5722