Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meta.updateWalker: remove because it is not used #151363

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 27, 2022

Conversation

Stunkymonkey
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

#103997 removing the documentation about meta.updateWalker

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
    • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@Stunkymonkey
Copy link
Contributor Author

can someone help me in how to better document this? is running nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh needed?

@Mic92 Mic92 requested a review from ryantm December 20, 2021 07:20
@ryantm
Copy link
Member

ryantm commented Dec 21, 2021

Shouldn't this be in the same PR that removes update-walker.sh? (Assuming we actually do want to remove it, I don't know about it.)

is running nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh needed?

No, that's only needed if you change the NixOS docs, not the nixpkgs ones like you have here.

@Stunkymonkey Stunkymonkey changed the title meta.updateWalker: remove doc, because it is not used meta.updateWalker: remove because it is not used Dec 21, 2021
@Stunkymonkey
Copy link
Contributor Author

sure i can include the removal into a single PR. I thought more of splitting it up into multiple PRs

@Stunkymonkey Stunkymonkey force-pushed the doc-updateWalker branch 2 times, most recently from beed247 to 0cb3050 Compare December 25, 2021 16:17
@Stunkymonkey
Copy link
Contributor Author

i just notice, that all additional changes i did are not very helpful for reviewing the PR. Should I remove them?

@Stunkymonkey
Copy link
Contributor Author

i removed all the changes, that were not necessary

Copy link
Member

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Stunkymonkey
Copy link
Contributor Author

is now removed in the last commit

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit 27cccd4 into NixOS:master Jan 27, 2022
@zowoq
Copy link
Contributor

zowoq commented Jan 30, 2022

This seems to have missed a couple of files?

url http://luarocks.org/releases/


This is still used in one place, I'd suggest moving into the the same directory.


version="$("$(dirname "$0")/../../../build-support/upstream-updater/urls-from-page.sh" "$url/releases/" | grep /tag/ | head -n 1 | xargs -l1 basename)"


Can also remove these from .editorconfig:

nixpkgs/.editorconfig

Lines 70 to 72 in 3540d00

[pkgs/build-support/upstream-updater/**]
indent_style = unset
trim_trailing_whitespace = unset

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

@Stunkymonkey can you please take a look at the above comment? I currently miss the time to do that.

This was referenced Jan 30, 2022
@Stunkymonkey Stunkymonkey deleted the doc-updateWalker branch February 14, 2022 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants