Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixos/system/activation/bootspec: adopt the latest specification #221893

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RaitoBezarius
Copy link
Member

Description of changes

This PR adopts the latest specification of RFC-0125 (hopefully the last one).

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@cole-h
Copy link
Member

cole-h commented Apr 3, 2023

Now that NixOS/rfcs#125 has been merged, is it time to mark this ready for review? :)

I also believe that there was talk about making enforcement to this spec disabled by default (so as not to have Go in the closure by default). Should that be implemented here, or in a separate PR? (Or is it already implemented?)

@RaitoBezarius
Copy link
Member Author

Superseded by #224489 ! Everything is done in that PR :)

@cole-h cole-h deleted the bootspec-cue branch April 3, 2023 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants