Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wallet page still has a scroll 📜 #328

Open
felipegaucho opened this issue Nov 26, 2017 · 15 comments
Open

Wallet page still has a scroll 📜 #328

felipegaucho opened this issue Nov 26, 2017 · 15 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@felipegaucho
Copy link
Collaborator

Description:

The wallet page still has its scroll bar on the side, and I seem unable to get rid of it :)

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Share the player on twitter, or go to https://paratii-video.github.io/paratii-embed/
  2. Go to the wallet page. Check there on the right.

Actual result:

In a twitter share:
screen shot 2017-11-26 at 9 01 14 am

In the embedding playground (embedded version):
screen shot 2017-11-26 at 9 36 20 am

Expected result:

No scroll bar!

@bent0b0x
Copy link
Contributor

Will look at this one later today 👌

@bent0b0x
Copy link
Contributor

bent0b0x commented Nov 26, 2017

@felipegaucho which browser/OS are you using? I believe this is a browser-specific problem/setting, specifically in determining whether scroll bars should show up all of the time when an area is scrollable (which the profile page is). Yes right now there is not much content that makes scrolling the profile page useful, but in the future there will be more content/features on this page so scrolling will need to be enabled. Here is how it looks on my machine (note how they only appear when the user is actively scrolling).

scrollprofile

@jrgarou
Copy link
Collaborator

jrgarou commented Nov 27, 2017

@bent0b0x I'm using the mini design as a guide.
On this page, there'll be probably a scroll bar(or not 😀), but we could remove it follow the last @pedrocasa's layout :
m27

@jellegerbrandy
Copy link
Contributor

I think having scrollbars within an iframe is evil and to be avoided at all costs :-)

@bent0b0x
Copy link
Contributor

Will work on this one tomorrow 👍

@bent0b0x
Copy link
Contributor

bent0b0x commented Nov 30, 2017

@pedrocasa can you attach a version of the design jr posted above with the grid overlay?

And while we're at it, if you have grid designs for the other screensize breakpoints feel free to send those over and I'll adjust profile accordingly. I would like to use this as an opportunity to improve the rendering of the profile page at all dimensions (paying attention to things like the dimension of the PTI/ETH boxes, and the font sizes within them, etc).

Below is a quick POC of what the responsive changes in dimensions/font sizes can look like:

profileresponsive


Here is a slightly more involved POC involving changing sizes of text/buttons in the header as well in tiny mode:

responsive

(note to self: this branch has the changes in the gifs above)

@pedrocasa
Copy link
Collaborator

pedrocasa commented Dec 1, 2017

Hey Ben
We fix the twitter problem by resizing the player ... now the mini version is 490X280

capture

5pxX5px grid

@pedrocasa
Copy link
Collaborator

capture

@jrgarou
Copy link
Collaborator

jrgarou commented Dec 1, 2017

@bent0b0x use the .wide class on .main-modal-wrapper to build this modal

@bent0b0x
Copy link
Contributor

bent0b0x commented Dec 2, 2017

@jrgarou that class seems to specify a width of 530px (but it gets capped at 500px due to a max-width restriction). The embedded version is only 490px wide. Should we consider a percentage based approach?

@bent0b0x
Copy link
Contributor

bent0b0x commented Dec 2, 2017

image

@pedrocasa let me know what you think. No more scroll, this is how it looks 490x280

@pedrocasa
Copy link
Collaborator

Getting better, The distance between the boxes still wrong and maybe we should give less weight for the "dont worry " sentence

@jrgarou
Copy link
Collaborator

jrgarou commented Dec 4, 2017

@jrgarou that class seems to specify a width of 530px (but it gets capped at 500px due to a max-width restriction). The embedded version is only 490px wide. Should we consider a percentage based approach?

@bent0b0x Yes. Lets talk.
I think we should use percent with max-width of the "tiny".
What you think?

May I do this and change the edit profile?

@bent0b0x
Copy link
Contributor

bent0b0x commented Dec 4, 2017

@jrgarou feel free!

@bent0b0x
Copy link
Contributor

bent0b0x commented Dec 4, 2017

@pedrocasa have a look

image

jrgarou added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants