Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: mark Client.get_or_fetch_user() as a coro #2069

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 11, 2023
Merged

docs: mark Client.get_or_fetch_user() as a coro #2069

merged 2 commits into from
May 11, 2023

Conversation

Sengolda
Copy link
Contributor

@Sengolda Sengolda commented May 11, 2023

Summary

Client.get_or_fetch_user() was not marked as a coro meaning it did not show the This function is a coroutine in the docs.

Information

  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed).
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting,
    examples, ...).

Checklist

  • I have searched the open pull requests for duplicates.
  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why.
  • I have updated the changelog to include these changes.

@Sengolda Sengolda requested a review from a team as a code owner May 11, 2023 18:38
@Lulalaby
Copy link
Member

Thank u!

@Lulalaby Lulalaby enabled auto-merge (squash) May 11, 2023 19:17
@Lulalaby Lulalaby requested review from ChickenDevs and removed request for CodeWithSwastik and VincentRPS May 11, 2023 19:18
@Lulalaby Lulalaby merged commit 327f8d9 into Pycord-Development:master May 11, 2023
@pullapprove4
Copy link

pullapprove4 bot commented Jul 27, 2023

Please add a changelog entry

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants