Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xDTD errors in CI #2257

Closed
dkoslicki opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

xDTD errors in CI #2257

dkoslicki opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dkoslicki
Copy link
Member

While all tests passed locally for me and @kvnthomas98 , it appears that xDTD tests are throwing errors on the Jenkins CI/CD. I assume this is something back-end. Assigning to @chunyuma or @kvnthomas98 depending on who has time/bandwidth.

@chunyuma
Copy link
Collaborator

@dkoslicki, I will take a look in the next few days.

@chunyuma
Copy link
Collaborator

chunyuma commented Mar 26, 2024

Hi @edeutsch or @amykglen, for this issue, I found this message saying the update xdtd database not present locally. I'm wondering if we need to manually update xdtd model somewhere for CI/CD. It seems like this might be the reason for the errors on the CI/CD.

@amykglen
Copy link
Member

amykglen commented Mar 27, 2024

hi @chunyuma - yes, I believe the database manager still needs to be run manually on cicd.rtx.ai once upon changes to config_dbs.json. see this part of the wiki: https://github.com/RTXteam/RTX/wiki/CI-system-(via-GitHub-actions)#the-runners-workflow

Screen Shot 2024-03-27 at 1 29 49 PM
(@sundareswarpullela can correct me if I'm wrong)

@chunyuma
Copy link
Collaborator

Ah, I see. It is good to know about this. Thanks so much @amykglen. I will try seeing if it can fix this issue.

@chunyuma
Copy link
Collaborator

I close this issue because it has been fixed after updating the xdtd database on cicd.rtx.ai. Thanks @amykglen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants