Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test PR #21

Closed
Closed

Conversation

ariostas
Copy link

No description provided.

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

1 similar comment
@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

There was a problem while building and running in standalone mode. The logs can be found here.

1 similar comment
Copy link

There was a problem while building and running in standalone mode. The logs can be found here.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 26, 2024

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:


Test

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    134.3    234.3     90.3     83.4     76.4    305.3    108.5    122.2    202.8    820.6    2178.1    1738.4+/- 569.4    1155.7   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     44.9    335.8    121.5     70.0     91.2    501.4    324.1    153.9    105.4      1.9    1750.1    1203.8+/- 329.5     475.9   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    130.3    233.2     87.0     82.2     76.4    312.7    114.5    124.1    194.0    737.8    2092.3    1649.3+/- 546.4    1155.5   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     43.8    323.6    121.3     68.7     92.1    547.2    322.7    152.3    108.9      1.7    1782.3    1191.3+/- 328.7     478.6   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    135.3    229.0     91.0     83.1     84.9    307.7    109.5    132.8    200.8    769.8    2143.7    1700.8+/- 566.1    1152.4   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     43.9    323.4    123.8     70.3     91.2    552.6    323.0    155.2    108.8      2.8    1794.9    1198.4+/- 331.9     483.5   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    133.7    232.4     89.0     78.2     80.1    306.8    113.3    118.2    196.4    804.4    2152.6    1712.1+/- 518.6    1148.1   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     43.9    325.5    122.6     68.5     93.0    549.8    324.2    154.7    107.3      2.1    1791.6    1197.9+/- 324.8     480.1   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    151.6    242.8     97.2     77.3     86.9    311.2    122.7    131.5    199.3    720.6    2141.1    1678.3+/- 531.0    1157.4   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     44.7    325.3    122.6     69.7     93.3    550.2    322.2    154.4    108.3      2.5    1793.1    1198.2+/- 331.5     481.4   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    111.2    232.7     88.8     89.7     82.0    304.9    107.7    124.0    196.0    801.7    2138.7    1722.7+/- 566.1    1163.8   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     44.0    328.8    125.3     73.0     94.8    549.7    324.5    156.0    107.3      1.7    1805.0    1211.3+/- 335.7     484.4   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

1 similar comment
@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    133.3    235.2     92.3     75.3     73.4    307.4    126.7    136.5    198.0    795.3    2173.4    1732.7+/- 599.1    1156.1   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     44.4    323.5    123.2     69.4     91.4    504.9    322.4    155.5    105.2      2.5    1742.4    1193.2+/- 330.4     473.2   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    117.1    233.1     90.1     81.6     74.1    308.6    100.5    117.6    193.0    829.4    2145.0    1719.3+/- 528.3    1152.2   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     43.6    325.5    122.9     68.4     90.6    548.3    323.7    153.9    134.6      2.5    1814.1    1222.1+/- 335.2     490.0   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    175.7    229.9     90.1     77.4     83.0    306.4    105.4    131.2    197.2    755.1    2151.4    1669.3+/- 531.8    1157.6   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     45.5    323.5    124.0     72.0     93.8    552.1    324.6    156.3    110.6      2.6    1805.1    1207.5+/- 331.7     490.9   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas
Copy link
Author

/run standalone

Copy link

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

Efficiency vs pT comparison Efficiency vs eta comparison
Fake rate vs pT comparison Fake rate vs eta comparison
Duplicate rate vs pT comparison Duplicate rate vs eta comparison

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg    157.0    240.6     95.9     76.5     80.1    306.4    118.8    123.7    199.0    725.0    2122.9    1659.5+/- 549.5    1161.1   explicit_cache[s=4] (master)
   avg     44.2    325.8    123.2     71.3     93.7    548.9    322.9    155.4    110.9      2.5    1798.8    1205.7+/- 330.9     487.0   explicit_cache[s=4] (this PR)

@ariostas ariostas closed this Apr 30, 2024
@ariostas ariostas deleted the fix_timings branch May 8, 2024 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant