Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[rust] Update Selenium Manager roadmap in README #11171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

bonigarcia
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR updated the roadmap (i.e., milestone planed) for the initial development of Selenium Manager.

Motivation and Context

Part of the Selenium Manager development.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing document.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Copy link
Member

@titusfortner titusfortner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also need to be able to support M1 architecture; cross-compilation?
How are we determining 32 vs 64 right now? Should that be configurable?
Eventually need to figure out if we can solve the snap issue for people.

rust/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rust/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
rust/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@bonigarcia
Copy link
Member Author

Regarding ARM (or other architectures), I think that is not priority. I tried the Selenium Manager macOS binary (generated in GH Actions) in a macOS M1 and it works. Regarding 32-64 arch, I am not sure. It would be interesting to test the current binaries (Windows, macOS, Linux) generated in GH Actions in different platforms.

@titusfortner
Copy link
Member

I think that is not priority

I'm not saying it is a priority, but it should be on a list of possible features. Maybe not part of "roadmap" per se.

@titusfortner titusfortner self-requested a review October 27, 2022 19:39
@bonigarcia bonigarcia merged commit bfba0f5 into trunk Oct 28, 2022
@bonigarcia bonigarcia deleted the se_mgr_roadmap branch October 28, 2022 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants