Add support for developer-only command #42
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
szc602639921
pushed a commit
to szc602639921/DiscordJS-V14-Bot-Template
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
Add support for developer-only command
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed Enhancements
Rationale for Introducing the 'Developers' Option
Upon careful evaluation of the existing codebase, it has come to my attention that a considerable number of commands are geared towards catering to developers' specific needs. Validating the authenticity of developers has proven to be a complex task. In light of this, the proposed 'developers' option aims to streamline the process by enabling the handling of developer-specific commands with minimal code intervention, thereby enhancing efficiency and maintainability. This addition is anticipated to significantly expedite the execution of developer commands while upholding a high standard of code integrity.
Your feedback on these proposed enhancements would be greatly appreciated.