feat: support for more assets #434
Conversation
alecdwm
commented
Jan 11, 2023
•
alecdwm
commented
- Test that deploying the new squid won't break the existing live build (due to adding new tokens which the live build doesn't support)
- Deploy the new squid
… state query results
alecdwm
force-pushed
the
feat/support-for-more-assets
branch
from
ad2a4cb
to
95820d0
Compare
alecdwm
force-pushed
the
feat/support-for-more-assets
branch
3 times, most recently
from
1685a6f
to
3fae1b2
Compare
alecdwm
force-pushed
the
feat/support-for-more-assets
branch
from
3fae1b2
to
f6c9f39
Compare
alecdwm
force-pushed
the
feat/support-for-more-assets
branch
from
8dfec82
to
a327f27
Compare
it breaks the resolution of dependencies-of-dependencies in downstream projects e.g. for @talismn/web -> @talismn/balances-react -> @talismn/balances @talismn/balances resolves to the version with a git hash beginning with the lowest letter of the alphabet, rather than the most recently published
| metadata.__kind === "V12" || | ||
| metadata.__kind === "V13" | ||
| ) { | ||
| // we can't parse metadata < v14 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any chance you could put a link to some docs or a GH issue on this so future devs can understand why v14 is different?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good idea!
I'll link to this pr. Before v14 the client had to know the chain types ahead of time, whereas with v14 it's now possible to fetch them from the chain RPC.
|
|
||
| suppressPortableRegistryConsoleWarnings() | ||
|
|
||
| const importDynamic = new Function("modulePath", "return import(modulePath)") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure if this will be permissable in manifest v3. The guidelines refer to 'remote code', but I suspect that reviewers will just look at new Function and say no.
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/mv3-migration-checklist/#api-remote-code
I can see this is a tricky issue, are there any other potential methods?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah yikes :|
Maybe we can just write this module as plain javascript (then tsc won't convert the import into a require)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's an issue for it on the tsc github with some alternatives
microsoft/TypeScript#43329
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this one is worth trying
microsoft/TypeScript#43329 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
inclusion did not work (causes Critical dependency: the request of a dependency is an expression errors in frontend bundles), now using a different approach (import a .cjs file which is not transpiled by tsc, use dynamic import with vite-ignore and webpackIgnore: true magic comments)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
