Update README.md

README.md

@@ -59,6 +59,13 @@ Further detail around some tests I did comparing the BULK, ie. standard data tra
 
        no writing: 1 318 000 iterations
 
+This test would therefore indicate it is certainly worthwhile to consider Isochronous datatransfers, in time critical applications.
+
+What I did notice during my testing was that Windows will initialize an Isochronous datatransfer on an 8ms interval not faster.
+Doing the math, one could conclude it is not faster than a normal Bulk transfer (which transmits 52bytes on 0.2ms). However the overhead that the Bulk transfer imposes on the processor seems to completely offset this as shown by the tests above.
+
+This implies transmitting 1023bytes every 8ms, eg. 1x1023bytes/8ms or 2x1023/12ms or 3x1023/14ms, ....
+
 
 
 Hope it can inspire you,