Wrong License text

[kt315ua]

Hi,
In our project was detected License that is not allowed. As it was discovered that aiohttp was updated and start using this lib.
So, i'm assuming that problem appeared by incorrect License text. As result of small investigation,Text of current license is wrong: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohappyeyeballs/blob/800f0f18d51f85e69083bcf45484a06dcb81f1ae/LICENSE

There is a text that is should be: https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/LICENSES/PSF-2.0.txt

As result, I'm expecting normal license definition on PyPi https://pypi.org/project/aiohappyeyeballs/ as "PSF-2.0" without 'Other/Proprietary License'

[bdraco]

The license text is correct. Its copied directly from https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/LICENSE

The problem is likely the missing classifier

[fredrikjacobson]

Hi

We're still seeing Other/Proprietary License; Python Software Foundation License from pip audit for version 2.3.4. Somewhat surprisingly since pypi list PSF-2.0

[webknjaz]

One is coming from the free-form license field, while the other is listed as a Trove classifier. Perhaps, different tools show different bits of the metadata.

[michael-nammi]

It appears there are two versions of the PSF-2.0 license. Typically, I would expect PSF-2.0 to refer to the license mentioned at SPDX PSF-2.0. However, the license text in this project seems to align more closely with SPDX Python-2.0. Could someone clarify which license is being used?
https://spdx.org/licenses/PSF-2.0.html
https://spdx.org/licenses/Python-2.0.html

[bdraco]

Most of this code comes from python itself. The intent is to license it under the same terms as python itself.

[bdraco]

Python-2.0 and License :: OSI Approved :: Python License (CNRI Python License) are probably a better fit here