This repository has been archived by the owner on May 28, 2024. It is now read-only.
Clarify Python version restriction documentation #187
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jillr
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2021
Andersson007
reviewed
Oct 6, 2021
Co-authored-by: Andrew Klychkov <aklychko@redhat.com>
Andersson007
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2021
tadeboro
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2021
dmsimard
reviewed
Oct 13, 2021
acozine
reviewed
Oct 13, 2021
Co-authored-by: Alicia Cozine <879121+acozine@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Please comment on the updated PR, resp. add suggestions to it if you want to change parts of @acozine's suggestion! |
Co-authored-by: James Cassell <code@james.cassell.me>
felixfontein
commented
Oct 24, 2021
|
Thanks everyone for contributing to this! :) |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SUMMARY
This information didn't end up in the final document, even though this is partially mentioned in the checklist and we voted on it (#151 (comment)). I've tried to formulate it so it fits into the current guidelines.
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
collection requirements