feat(game): game feedback submitter #969
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive feedback submission feature within the game interface. Key components include a new button for submitting feedback, various modal and form components for user input, and associated types and methods for managing feedback data. The changes span multiple files, enhancing both the user interface and the underlying data structures to support feedback collection. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 25
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (59)
app/components/pages/game/GameOver/game-over.types.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for clarity.The
GameOverEmitstype is well-defined and correctly exported. The use of an empty tuple forgameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClicksuggests this event is emitted without any payload, which is fine if that's the intended behavior.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this type and the
gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickevent. This can improve code readability and maintainability. For example:/** * Defines the emits for the GameOver component. */ type GameOverEmits = { /** * Emitted when the game feedback submitter button is clicked. * This event doesn't carry any payload. */ gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: []; }; export type { GameOverEmits };app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/game-canceled.types.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The
GameCanceledEmitstype is well-defined and follows TypeScript best practices. To further improve code clarity and maintainability, consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of the type and its event.Here's a suggested improvement:
/** * Defines the emitted events for the GameCanceled component. */ type GameCanceledEmits = { /** * Emitted when the game feedback submitter button is clicked. */ gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: []; };app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/game-feedback-submitter-rating.types.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterRatingPropstype is well-defined and follows Vue 3 conventions with themodelValueprop. However, adding JSDoc comments would improve the documentation and provide more context for developers using this type.Consider adding JSDoc comments like this:
/** * Props for the GameFeedbackSubmitterRating component. */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterRatingProps = { /** * The current rating value. Should be a number (e.g., 1-5 for a star rating). */ modelValue: number; };app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/game-feedback-submitter-review.types.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The type definition and its export are well-structured and follow TypeScript conventions. The naming is consistent with the component it represents.
Consider adding a brief comment to explain the purpose of the
modelValueproperty. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:type GameFeedbackSubmitterReviewProps = { /** The current value of the review text input */ modelValue?: string; };app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/game-feedback-submitter.types.ts (1)
1-3: Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.To improve code readability and provide better context for developers using this type, consider adding JSDoc comments. This will be especially helpful if the codebase uses automatic documentation generation tools.
Here's a suggested implementation:
+/** + * Exposes the functionality of the GameFeedbackSubmitter component. + */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterExposed = { + /** + * Displays the game feedback submitter interface. + */ showGameFeedbackSubmitter: () => void; };app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/game-over-actions.types.ts (1)
1-6: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.The changes to
GameOverActionsEmitstype look good. The new structure withgameHistoryButtonClickandgameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickevents provides a more decoupled approach, allowing for better separation of concerns between the UI events and their handlers.To improve code documentation, consider adding JSDoc comments for each event. This can help other developers understand the purpose of each event without needing to look at the implementation. Here's a suggested improvement:
type GameOverActionsEmits = { /** Emitted when the game history button is clicked */ gameHistoryButtonClick: []; /** Emitted when the game feedback submitter button is clicked */ gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: []; };app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/game-feedback-submitter-button.types.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtonEmitstype is well-defined and follows Vue 3's typed emit events pattern. The empty array[]correctly indicates that the event doesn't pass any arguments when emitted.For improved clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this type:
/** * Defines the emits for the GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component. * The gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick event is emitted without any payload. */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterButtonEmits = { gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: []; };app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error.types.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Consider adding a JSDoc comment for better documentation.The type definition and its export are well-structured and follow TypeScript best practices. The naming is clear and descriptive, making the purpose of the type evident.
For consistency and improved documentation, consider adding a JSDoc comment above the type definition. This can provide more context about its usage and any important details for developers using this type. Here's a suggested implementation:
+/** + * Props for the GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError component. + * @property {boolean} hasEncounteredError - Indicates whether an error has been encountered during feedback submission. + */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredErrorProps = { hasEncounteredError: boolean; }; export type { GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredErrorProps, };app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/game-feedback-submitter-content.types.ts (1)
3-5: LGTM: Type definition is clear and follows conventions.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterContentPropstype is well-defined and follows naming conventions for Vue component props. The use ofmodelValuesuggests this is for v-model in Vue 3, which is a good practice.Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment to explain the purpose of this type, especially mentioning its use with v-model. For example:
/** * Props for the GameFeedbackSubmitterContent component. * Used with v-model for two-way binding of the feedback data. */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterContentProps = { modelValue: CreateGameFeedbackDto; };app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/game-feedback-submitter-footer.types.ts (1)
7-9: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterEmits type is correctly defined.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterEmitstype is well-defined, following Vue 3 emits typing convention. ThecloseDialogevent is clearly named and correctly specified to take no parameters.Consider using
voidinstead of an empty array for slightly improved readability:type GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterEmits = { closeDialog: () => void; };This change is optional and doesn't affect functionality, but it might be more idiomatic in TypeScript for events without payloads.
app/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.ts (1)
15-17: LGTM with suggestion: Consider refining the static create method signature.The static
createmethod is well-implemented, usingplainToInstancefor proper object transformation and applying default options for consistency. However, the method signature can be improved.Consider changing the method signature to accept a plain object instead of an instance of the class:
public static create(data: Partial<CreateGameFeedbackDto>): CreateGameFeedbackDto { return plainToInstance(CreateGameFeedbackDto, data, DEFAULT_PLAIN_TO_INSTANCE_OPTIONS); }This change would make the method more flexible and align better with its purpose of creating class instances from plain objects.
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.factory.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM: Correct import for CreateGameFeedbackDto.The import of
CreateGameFeedbackDtois appropriate and necessary for this factory function.Consider using a more specific import path instead of the
~alias for better readability and maintainability. For example:import { CreateGameFeedbackDto } from "../../../../../composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto";This can make it easier to understand the relative location of the imported module.
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.factory.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Correct import for GameFeedback class.The import statement for the GameFeedback class is correct. However, consider using an absolute import path instead of the '~' alias for better portability and IDE support.
Consider updating the import statement to use an absolute path:
-import { GameFeedback } from "~/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class"; +import { GameFeedback } from "@/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class";
6-14: LGTM: Well-implemented factory function with a minor suggestion.The function body is well-implemented:
- Correctly uses GameFeedback.create() for type safety.
- Properly handles partial overrides with the nullish coalescing operator.
- Appropriate use of faker for generating random test data.
Minor suggestion for consistency:
Consider adding a default value for the 'review' field to maintain consistency with other fields:
- review: gameFeedback.review, + review: gameFeedback.review ?? faker.lorem.paragraph(),This change would provide a random review text when not explicitly provided, which might be useful in some test scenarios.
app/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.ts (2)
5-27: LGTM: Well-structured class with consistent use of decorators.The
GameFeedbackclass is well-organized with clear property definitions and consistent use of@Expose()decorators. This structure facilitates easy serialization and deserialization of the class instances.Consider adding a class-level JSDoc comment to provide a brief description of the
GameFeedbackclass and its purpose. This would enhance code documentation and improve developer understanding.
6-22: LGTM: Properties are well-defined with appropriate types.The class properties are comprehensive and use appropriate types, which enhances type safety. The optional 'review' property is a good design choice.
Consider adding property-level JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of each property, especially for less self-explanatory ones like
hasEncounteredError. This would improve code documentation and maintainability.tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.spec.ts (2)
4-6: Test structure is good, but consider adding more test cases.The nested describe blocks provide a clear and organized structure for the tests. However, to ensure comprehensive coverage of the
CreateGameFeedbackDtoclass, consider adding more test cases. For example:
- Test with minimum required fields.
- Test with all possible fields.
- Test with invalid input (if applicable).
- Test edge cases (e.g., maximum/minimum scores).
Also applies to: 20-21
6-19: Test case is good, but could be more robust.The test case effectively verifies the basic functionality of the
CreateGameFeedbackDto.createmethod. However, consider the following improvements:
- Verify that the
createmethod is actually transforming the input:expect(createdGameFeedbackDto).not.toBe(gameFeedbackDto);- Test with different input values to ensure the method handles various scenarios correctly.
- Consider testing the behavior when optional fields are omitted.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.spec.ts (2)
6-26: LGTM with suggestions: Comprehensive basic test case.The test case effectively verifies the basic functionality of the
GameFeedback.createmethod. The use oftoStrictEqualensures a thorough comparison of all properties.To enhance test coverage, consider adding the following test cases:
- Test with minimum required fields (if any are optional).
- Test with invalid inputs (e.g., negative score, invalid date).
- Test with edge cases (e.g., maximum score, very long review).
Would you like me to provide example implementations for these additional test cases?
1-28: LGTM with a minor suggestion: High-quality test code.The code is well-formatted, uses descriptive variable names, and follows TypeScript and Jest best practices. To further improve type safety, consider adding explicit type annotations for the
gameFeedbackandcreatedGameFeedbackvariables.Here's a suggested improvement for lines 8 and 16:
- const gameFeedback = createFakeGameFeedback({ + const gameFeedback: Partial<GameFeedback> = createFakeGameFeedback({ // ... }); - const createdGameFeedback = GameFeedback.create(gameFeedback); + const createdGameFeedback: GameFeedback = GameFeedback.create(gameFeedback);app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.vue (3)
1-19: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label for accessibility.The template structure is well-organized and follows Vue best practices. The use of PrimeVueButton, conditional rendering, and internationalization are all implemented correctly. The FontAwesomeIcon adds a nice visual touch with the 'beat-fade' animation.
Consider adding an
aria-labelattribute to the button for improved accessibility:<PrimeVueButton v-if="isButtonVisible" id="game-feedback-submitter-button" class="w-full" :label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.giveFeedback')" severity="info" + :aria-label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.giveFeedback')" @click="onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButton" >
21-38: LGTM! Consider usingtoReffor better reactivity.The script section is well-structured and follows Vue 3 Composition API best practices. The use of TypeScript, Pinia for state management, and proper event handling are all implemented correctly.
For better reactivity, consider using
toRefinstead ofstoreToRefsfor thegameproperty:-import { storeToRefs } from "pinia"; +import { toRef } from "vue"; const gameStore = useGameStore(); -const { game } = storeToRefs(gameStore); +const game = toRef(gameStore, "game"); -const isButtonVisible = computed<boolean>(() => !game.value.feedback); +const isButtonVisible = computed<boolean>(() => !game.value?.feedback);This change ensures that
gameremains reactive even if it's reassigned in the store. Also, the optional chaining (?.) inisButtonVisiblecomputation adds a layer of safety in casegameis undefined.
1-38: Great job on this component! Consider future enhancements.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent is well-structured, focused, and follows Vue 3 best practices. It effectively integrates with the game store and provides a clear, single-responsibility interface for initiating game feedback submission.For future enhancements, consider:
- Adding unit tests to ensure the component's behavior remains consistent as the application evolves.
- Implementing a loading state for the button to handle potential delays in feedback submission.
- Adding a tooltip to provide more context about the feedback process when users hover over the button.
These suggestions can further improve the component's robustness and user experience.
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game.factory.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM! Consider adding a type annotation for consistency.The addition of the
feedbackproperty is well-implemented, allowing for flexible test scenarios with optional feedback. The use of the nullish coalescing operator is a good practice.For consistency with other properties in the function, consider adding a type annotation:
feedback: game.feedback ?? null as Game['feedback'] | null,This explicitly declares the type and maintains consistency with the rest of the function.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.vue (2)
18-36: Improve accessibility for the textarea labelThe current implementation uses a
PrimeVueFloatLabelcomponent with a nestedlabelelement for the textarea. While this approach works visually, it may not provide the best accessibility experience.Consider the following improvements:
- Add an
aria-labelledbyattribute to thePrimeVueTextareacomponent, referencing the ID of the label.- Ensure that the
forattribute on the label matches theidof the textarea.Here's an example of how you could modify the code:
<PrimeVueFloatLabel variant="on"> <PrimeVueTextarea id="game-feedback-submitter-review-input" v-model="review" auto-resize cols="30" :disabled="isReviewTextareaDisabled" fluid max-length="1000" rows="5" + aria-labelledby="game-feedback-submitter-review-input-label" /> <label id="game-feedback-submitter-review-input-label" for="game-feedback-submitter-review-input" > {{ $t("components.GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.thisIsOptional") }} </label> </PrimeVueFloatLabel>These changes will improve the accessibility of the textarea by ensuring proper label association.
46-51: Enhance type safety forcreatingGameFeedbackStatusThe current implementation assumes that
creatingGameFeedbackStatusis a string with a possible value of "pending". To improve type safety and make the code more robust, consider defining an enum or union type for the possible status values.Here's a suggestion to improve type safety:
- Define a type for the game feedback status:
type GameFeedbackStatus = "idle" | "pending" | "success" | "error";
- Update the store reference and computed property:
const { creatingGameFeedbackStatus } = storeToRefs(gameStore) as { creatingGameFeedbackStatus: Ref<GameFeedbackStatus> }; const isReviewTextareaDisabled = computed<boolean>(() => creatingGameFeedbackStatus.value === "pending");This change will provide better type checking and make the code more maintainable by explicitly defining the possible status values.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.vue (1)
30-37: Solid TypeScript setup with room for documentation.The script section makes good use of TypeScript and Vue 3 features:
- Proper imports of necessary components and types.
- Use of the new
defineModelfeature for two-way binding.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the
defineModelusage, as it's a relatively new Vue 3 feature that some developers might not be familiar with.app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.vue (1)
50-52: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Consider adding a comment for future enhancements.The
onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonmethod is correctly implemented and emits the expected event. However, it might be helpful to add a comment indicating any future plans or potential logic that might be added here.For example:
function onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButton(): void { // TODO: Add any necessary pre-processing or state updates before emitting the event emit("gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick"); }This comment could serve as a reminder for future development or indicate that the current implementation is intentionally simple.
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
36-44: LGTM: New test case for Game Feedback Submitter Button.The new test case correctly verifies the emission of the
gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickevent. The structure and implementation of the test are sound.Consider adding a test to verify that the button is rendered correctly, in addition to checking its functionality. This could involve asserting the existence of the button in the DOM.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue (2)
1-35: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for improved accessibility.The template structure is well-organized and follows Vue.js best practices. The use of translations, dynamic styling, and state management is commendable.
To enhance accessibility, consider adding ARIA attributes to the toggle button. For example:
<PrimeVueToggleButton id="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-input" v-model="hasEncounteredError" class="!border-0" :class="toggleButtonClasses" :disabled="isToggleButtonDisabled" :off-label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.gameWasStable')" :on-label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.gameEncounteredError')" + aria-labelledby="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-label" >This will associate the toggle button with its label, improving screen reader support.
37-53: LGTM! Consider memoizing thetoggleButtonClassescomputed property.The script section is well-structured and follows Vue.js and TypeScript best practices. The use of Pinia for state management and computed properties for derived values is commendable.
For a minor performance optimization, consider memoizing the
toggleButtonClassescomputed property to prevent unnecessary recalculations:-const toggleButtonClasses = computed<string>(() => (hasEncounteredError.value ? "!bg-error border-error" : "!bg-success")); +const toggleButtonClasses = computed<string>(() => (hasEncounteredError.value ? "!bg-error border-error" : "!bg-success"), { lazy: true });This change will ensure that the computed property is only re-evaluated when
hasEncounteredErrorchanges, potentially improving performance in scenarios where the component re-renders frequently.app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-60: Consider refactoring button click handlers for improved reusability.While the current implementation is correct, you might want to consider refactoring the button click handlers to improve code reusability. Instead of having separate functions for each button, you could use a single function that takes the event name as a parameter.
Here's a suggested refactor:
-function onClickFromShowHistoryButton(): void { - emit("gameHistoryButtonClick"); -} - -function onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButton(): void { - emit("gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick"); -} +function onButtonClick(eventName: string): void { + emit(eventName); +}Then update the template to use this function:
-@click="onClickFromShowHistoryButton" +@click="() => onButtonClick('gameHistoryButtonClick')" -@game-feedback-submitter-button-click="onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButton" +@game-feedback-submitter-button-click="() => onButtonClick('gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick')"This approach would make it easier to add new buttons in the future without needing to create a new function for each one.
app/composables/api/game/types/game.class.ts (1)
5-5: Approve new feedback property with a suggestion for documentation.The addition of the
feedbackproperty to theGameclass is well-implemented. It's correctly typed, nullable, and decorated for proper serialization/deserialization.Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment to describe the purpose of this property and its nullable nature. For example:
/** * Feedback associated with the game. Can be null if no feedback has been submitted. */ @Type(() => GameFeedback) @Expose() public feedback: GameFeedback | null;Also applies to: 52-54
app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.vue (2)
28-28: LGTM: Added type for emitted eventsGood addition of the
GameOverEmitstype import. This improves type safety for the component's emitted events.Consider using a barrel file (index.ts) in the GameOver folder to centralize and simplify imports. This would allow you to import from
~/components/pages/game/GameOverinstead of the full path.
70-79: LGTM: Updated and added event handler functionsThe changes to the event handler functions improve the clarity and functionality of the component:
- Renaming
onShowGameHistoryFromGameOverActionstoonClickFromGameHistoryButtonbetter reflects its purpose and matches the new event listener.- The new
onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonfunction correctly emits the event for the feedback submitter.Consider adding a comment above each function to briefly describe its purpose. This can help with maintainability, especially as the component grows.
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.nuxt.spec.ts (2)
13-32: LGTM: Well-structured test setup with a minor suggestion.The test setup is comprehensive and follows best practices. The use of factory functions for test data and a mounting helper function enhances maintainability and flexibility.
Consider adding a return type annotation to the
mountGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonComponentfunction for improved type safety:async function mountGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonComponent( options: ComponentMountingOptions<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterButton> = {} ): Promise<ReturnType<typeof mount<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterButton>>> { // ... existing implementation }
34-68: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage with suggestions for improvement.The test cases provide good coverage of the component's functionality, including visibility, label translation, and event emission. The use of
nextTick()in the visibility test ensures proper reactivity handling.Consider the following suggestions to enhance the test suite:
- Add a test case for the button's disabled state, if applicable.
- Consider replacing the snapshot test with more specific assertions about the component's structure. Snapshot tests can be brittle and require frequent updates.
- Add a test case to verify the correct icon is displayed on the button, if applicable.
Example of a more specific assertion instead of a snapshot test:
it("should render the button with correct attributes", () => { const button = wrapper.findComponent<typeof Button>("#game-feedback-submitter-button"); expect(button.exists()).toBe(true); expect(button.attributes("label")).toBe("Give feedback on this game"); // Add more specific assertions about the button's properties });tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts (5)
1-9: Imports look good, consider grouping them.The imports are appropriate for testing a Vue component with TypeScript. Good job on using type imports and project aliases.
Consider grouping the imports for better readability:
- External libraries (Vue Test Utils, PrimeVue)
- Internal utilities and types
- Component and store imports
This organization can make it easier to understand the dependencies at a glance.
11-32: Well-structured test setup, consider adding more default props.The test setup is well-organized with a helper function for mounting the component and a
beforeEachhook. This promotes consistency and reduces code duplication.Consider expanding the
defaultPropsobject to include all props that the component accepts. This can help ensure that all props are tested and make it easier to add new tests in the future.
34-37: Good snapshot test, consider adding a specific element check.The snapshot test is a good practice for catching unintended changes in component rendering.
Consider adding a specific element check before the snapshot assertion. For example:
expect(wrapper.find('#game-feedback-submitter-review-input').exists()).toBe(true);This can help pinpoint issues more quickly if the test fails.
39-45: Consider using a translation key instead of hardcoded text.Testing for correct translations is important, but using hardcoded text can make the test brittle if the translations change.
Instead of checking for the exact text, consider using a translation key:
import { useI18n } from 'vue-i18n'; // Inside the test const i18n = useI18n(); expect(label.text()).toBe(i18n.t('game.feedback.review.label'));This approach is more maintainable and less likely to break if the translation text changes.
47-80: Comprehensive textarea tests, consider adding a length validation test.The textarea tests cover important functionality including model value binding, updating, and disabled state. Good job on using the Pinia store to test different states and handling asynchronous updates with
nextTick().Consider adding a test for maximum length validation if the textarea has a character limit. For example:
it("should limit the input to the maximum allowed characters", async () => { const maxLength = 500; // Adjust based on your actual limit const longText = "a".repeat(maxLength + 1); const textarea = wrapper.findComponent<typeof Textarea>("#game-feedback-submitter-review-input"); await textarea.setValue(longText); expect(textarea.element.value.length).toBe(maxLength); });This ensures that the component correctly handles input length restrictions.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game.class.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
19-49: LGTM:createtest case correctly updated to includefeedback.The changes appropriately introduce the
feedbackproperty to the game creation process and update the expected game object. This ensures that thecreatemethod of theGameclass is thoroughly tested with the new property.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
feedbackproperty in the context of theGameclass. This would enhance the test's readability and provide context for future developers. For example:// Add feedback to test the new game feedback submission feature const feedback = createFakeGameFeedback();
Line range hint
67-95: LGTM:toJSONtest case correctly updated to includefeedback.The changes appropriately introduce the
feedbackproperty to the JSON serialization process of theGameclass. The test case is well-updated to include and verify the newfeedbackproperty in the JSON output.For consistency with the
createtest case, consider moving thefeedbackproperty next to other game-related properties in theexpectedGameobject. This would improve readability and maintain a consistent structure across test cases. For example:const expectedGame: OmitToJSON<Game> = { _id: "1", phase, players: [], status: "playing", currentPlay, upcomingPlays, tick: 1, turn: 1, options, feedback, // Move this line up lastGameHistoryRecord, createdAt, updatedAt, victory: undefined, };tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
14-34: Test setup is well-structured and follows best practices.The test setup is comprehensive and follows Vue testing best practices. Great job on using a factory function for creating fake DTOs and a helper function for mounting the component. These practices will make the tests more maintainable and easier to read.
A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider extracting the
defaultCreateGameFeedbackDtoanddefaultPropsinto a separate factory or helper function. This would allow for easier reuse in other test files if needed and improve the overall organization of the test setup.function createDefaultTestProps(): GameFeedbackSubmitterContentProps { const defaultCreateGameFeedbackDto = createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDto({ score: 2, review: "This game is awesome!", }); return { modelValue: defaultCreateGameFeedbackDto, }; }Then you can use it in your tests like this:
const defaultProps = createDefaultTestProps();tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.nuxt.spec.ts (3)
18-27: LGTM: Improved test setup and mounting functionThe new constants and updated
mountGameOverActionsComponentfunction enhance the test setup by providing a consistent game state and allowing for more flexible mounting options. The changes are well-implemented and align with the expected modifications.Consider adding a type annotation for
testingPiniato improve code readability:const testingPinia: Parameters<typeof createTestingPinia>[0] = { initialState: { [StoreIds.GAME]: { game: defaultGame } } };
47-55: LGTM: Improved test isolation with beforeEach hookThe new
beforeEachhook enhances test isolation by ensuring a consistent setup for each test in the "Show Game History Button" describe block. Stubbing theButtoncomponent allows for more focused testing of theGameOverActionscomponent's behavior.Consider extracting the mounting options into a separate constant for improved readability:
const mountOptions: ComponentMountingOptions<typeof GameOverActions> = { global: { stubs: { Button: false, }, }, }; beforeEach(async () => { wrapper = await mountGameOverActionsComponent(mountOptions); });
88-92: LGTM: New test case for game feedback submitter buttonThe new test case effectively verifies the emission of the "gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick" event from the GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component. This addition improves the test coverage for the GameOverActions component.
Consider adding a test to verify that the GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component is rendered correctly:
it("should render the game feedback submitter button", () => { const gameFeedbackSubmitterButton = wrapper.findComponent<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterButton>("#game-feedback-submitter-button"); expect(gameFeedbackSubmitterButton.exists()).toBe(true); });tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.spec.ts (1)
89-105: LGTM: Well-structured test suite forcreateGameFeedback.The new test suite for
createGameFeedbackis well-implemented and follows the existing patterns in the file. It covers both the success and error scenarios effectively.For consistency with other test cases in this file, consider adding a blank line after line 90 (the describe block opening).
describe("createGameFeedback", () => { + it("should create game feedback when called.", async() => { const gameId = "game-id"; const createGameFeedbackDto = createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDto();nuxt.config.ts (1)
159-162: LGTM: Components added for game feedback functionality.The addition of "Rating" and "Textarea" components to the PrimeVue configuration aligns with the PR objectives of implementing a game feedback submitter. These components are essential for collecting user ratings and text-based feedback.
A minor suggestion would be to maintain alphabetical order in the component list for better readability and easier maintenance. Consider moving "Rating" after "ProgressSpinner" and "Textarea" after "Tag".
tests/unit/specs/stores/game/useGameStore.spec.ts (2)
46-52: LGTM: New test cases for initial status states.The new test cases for checking the initial state of various statuses, including
creatingGameFeedbackStatus, are well-structured and consistent with the existing pattern.Consider using an array of status names and a loop to make the test more concise and easier to maintain:
it("should have initial state for all statuses when created.", () => { const gameStore = useGameStore(); const statuses = [ "fetchingGameStatus", "cancelingGameStatus", "makingGamePlayStatus", "creatingGameFeedbackStatus" ]; statuses.forEach(status => { expect(gameStore[status]).toBe("idle"); }); });
166-185: LGTM: New test cases for createGameFeedback.The new test cases for
createGameFeedbackare well-structured and cover the main functionality. They verify both the correct calling of the API method and the updating of the game state.Consider adding a test case to verify the behavior when the API call fails:
it("should handle errors when creating game feedback fails", async () => { const error = new Error("API Error"); hoistedMocks.useFetchGames.createGameFeedback.mockRejectedValue(error); const gameStore = useGameStore(); const createGameFeedbackDto = createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDto(); await expect(gameStore.createGameFeedback(createGameFeedbackDto)).rejects.toThrow("API Error"); expect(gameStore.creatingGameFeedbackStatus).toBe("error"); });This additional test would ensure that error handling is properly implemented in the store.
modules/i18n/locales/en.json (1)
1650-1650: Consider adding a comment for the new game feedback sectionTo improve code readability and maintainability, consider adding a comment above the new game feedback section. This will help other developers quickly identify and understand the purpose of these new keys.
+ // Game Feedback related keys "GameFeedbackSubmitterButton": { "giveFeedback": "Give feedback on this game" },modules/i18n/locales/fr.json (1)
Line range hint
1-1678: Consider consistent capitalization for section namesWhile the translations are generally well-done and consistent, there's a minor inconsistency in the capitalization of some section names. For example, "gamePhaseStartsEvent" uses camelCase, while "GameFeedbackSubmitter" uses PascalCase. Consider adopting a consistent approach throughout the file for better maintainability.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.vue (1)
65-65: Simplify the function name for clarityThe function name
onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterFooterButtonis quite verbose and can be simplified for better readability. A more concise name likesubmitFeedbackorhandleSubmitFeedbackwould make the code cleaner and easier to understand.Consider renaming the function and updating the corresponding event handler:
-async function onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterFooterButton(): Promise<void> { +async function submitFeedback(): Promise<void> {And update the click event in your template:
<PrimeVueButton id="game-feedback-submitter-footer-submit-button" :disabled="!canFeedbackBeSubmitted" :label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.submitFeedback')" :loading="isSubmitButtonLoading" severity="primary" size="large" - @click="onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterFooterButton" + @click="submitFeedback" > </PrimeVueButton>app/pages/game/[id].vue (2)
Line range hint
78-84: Use a Specific Component Type for Better Type SafetyYou've changed the type of
gameStatusComponentToRenderfromcomputed<GameStatusComponent>tocomputed<Component>. While this works, using the genericComponenttype reduces type safety and may lead to runtime errors that TypeScript can't catch. Consider defining a specific type that encompasses all possible components for better type checking.You can define a union type for
GameStatusComponent:type GameStatusComponent = typeof GamePlaying | typeof GameOver | typeof GameCanceled;Then update the computed property:
-const gameStatusComponentToRender = computed<Component>(() => { +const gameStatusComponentToRender = computed<GameStatusComponent>(() => {
39-39: Conditionally RenderGameFeedbackSubmitterfor PerformanceCurrently,
GameFeedbackSubmitteris always rendered, even when it might not be needed. Conditionally rendering it can improve performance by avoiding unnecessary component initialization.For example, if it's only needed when the game is over:
<GameFeedbackSubmitter v-if="game.status === 'over'" ref="gameFeedbackSubmitter"/>tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
25-33: Improve formatting of 'mountGameFeedbackSubmitterComponent' function signatureThe function signature and return type are split in a way that affects readability. Consider reformatting it for clarity.
Apply this diff to reformat the function signature:
-async function mountGameFeedbackSubmitterComponent(options: ComponentMountingOptions<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitter> = {}): -Promise<ReturnType<typeof mount<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitter>>> { +async function mountGameFeedbackSubmitterComponent( + options: ComponentMountingOptions<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitter> = {} +): Promise<ReturnType<typeof mount<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitter>>> {tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
47-49: Accessing props instead of attributes for 'model-value'When checking the
modelValueprop passed to a component, it's more accurate to useprops()instead ofattributes(), asattributes()may return string values and does not guarantee type correctness.Consider updating the assertion as follows:
- expect(rating.attributes("model-value")).toBe("2"); + expect(rating.props("modelValue")).toBe(2);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (8)
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/__snapshots__/GameCanceled.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitter.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/__snapshots__/GameOverActions.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (55)
- app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.vue (2 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/game-canceled.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/game-feedback-submitter-button.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/game-feedback-submitter-rating.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/game-feedback-submitter-review.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/game-feedback-submitter-content.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/game-feedback-submitter-footer.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/game-feedback-submitter.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.vue (4 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.vue (2 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/game-over-actions.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameOver/game-over.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GamePlaying/GameEventsMonitor/GameEventsMonitorCurrentEvent/game-events-monitor-current-event.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- app/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.ts (1 hunks)
- app/composables/api/game/types/game.class.ts (2 hunks)
- app/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.ts (3 hunks)
- app/pages/game/[id].vue (4 hunks)
- app/plugins/vue-font-awesome-icon/vue-font-awesome-icon.ts (4 hunks)
- app/stores/game/game-event/useGameEventsStore.ts (1 hunks)
- app/stores/game/useGameStore.ts (4 hunks)
- modules/i18n/locales/en.json (1 hunks)
- modules/i18n/locales/fr.json (3 hunks)
- nuxt.config.ts (1 hunks)
- package.json (0 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.nuxt.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.nuxt.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.nuxt.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.class.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game.class.spec.ts (7 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/pages/game/game-page.nuxt.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/stores/game/game-event/useGameEventsStore.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/stores/game/useGameStore.spec.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.factory.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.factory.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.factory.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game.factory.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.factory.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- package.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- app/components/pages/game/GamePlaying/GameEventsMonitor/GameEventsMonitorCurrentEvent/game-events-monitor-current-event.types.ts
- app/stores/game/game-event/useGameEventsStore.ts
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.class.spec.ts
- tests/unit/specs/stores/game/game-event/useGameEventsStore.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (102)
app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/game-canceled.types.ts (1)
1-3: Clarify the purpose of the event and consider adding a payload.The
gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickevent is currently defined without a payload. Could you clarify the intended use of this event? Depending on its purpose, it might be beneficial to include relevant data in the event emission.For example, if you need to pass any game-related information when the button is clicked, you could modify the type like this:
type GameCanceledEmits = { gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: [gameId: string]; };This would allow passing a
gameIdwhen emitting the event. Please confirm if this aligns with your requirements or if you prefer keeping it payload-free.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/game-feedback-submitter-rating.types.ts (1)
5-7: LGTM! Export statement is correct and follows best practices.The export statement correctly uses the
export typesyntax for exporting theGameFeedbackSubmitterRatingPropstype. This named export allows for explicit imports in other files, which is a good practice for maintainability.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/game-feedback-submitter.types.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterExposedtype is well-named and follows a clear, single-responsibility principle. It effectively exposes the necessary functionality for showing the game feedback submitter.
5-5: LGTM! Correct usage of type-only export.The export statement correctly uses the
typekeyword for a type-only export. This is a good practice in TypeScript as it ensures type information is available during development and compilation while not introducing any runtime overhead.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/game-feedback-submitter-button.types.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM! Correct type export.The export statement is correctly implemented using the
export typesyntax, which is appropriate for type-only exports in TypeScript. This makes theGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonEmitstype available for use in other files, which is necessary for defining the component's emit type.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/game-feedback-submitter-content.types.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and follows best practices.The import statement correctly uses the
typekeyword for a type-only import, which is a TypeScript best practice. The imported type is used in the subsequent type definition, making this import necessary and relevant.
7-9: LGTM: Export statement is correct and follows best practices.The export statement correctly uses the
typekeyword for a type-only export, which is a TypeScript best practice. The named export allows for selective imports in other files, promoting modularity and clear dependencies.
1-9: Overall, the file is well-structured and follows best practices.This new type definition file is concise, focused, and adheres to TypeScript and Vue best practices. It correctly imports, defines, and exports the necessary type for the GameFeedbackSubmitterContent component. The use of type-only imports and exports is commendable.
The only suggestion is to consider adding a brief JSDoc comment to the type definition for improved documentation. Great job on maintaining clean and type-safe code!
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/game-feedback-submitter-footer.types.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and necessary.The import statement is properly typed and imports the required
CreateGameFeedbackDtotype, which is used later in the file.
3-5: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterProps type is well-defined.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterPropstype is correctly defined with a single propertycreateGameFeedbackDtoof typeCreateGameFeedbackDto. The naming convention follows TypeScript best practices.
11-14: LGTM: Export statement is correct and comprehensive.The export statement correctly exports both
GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterPropsandGameFeedbackSubmitterFooterEmitstypes. Using named exports allows for easy and specific imports in other files.
1-14: Overall, excellent type definitions for GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.This file is well-structured and follows TypeScript best practices. It correctly defines and exports the necessary types (
GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterPropsandGameFeedbackSubmitterFooterEmits) for the GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter component. The types are clear, concise, and will contribute to improved type safety and developer experience when working with this component.tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.factory.ts (3)
17-17: LGTM! Consistent implementation of the mock function.The addition of
createGameFeedback: vi.fn()to thecreateFakeUseFetchGamesfunction is consistent with the existing structure and correctly implements the new mock function. This change aligns well with the updatedMockedUseFetchGamestype.
Line range hint
1-22: Overall, the changes look good and enhance the mock functionality.The additions to both the
MockedUseFetchGamestype and thecreateFakeUseFetchGamesfunction are consistent and well-implemented. They properly extend the mocking capabilities to include the newcreateGameFeedbackfunctionality, which aligns with the PR objectives of implementing game feedback submission features.
8-8: LGTM! Verify the corresponding change in the actual composable.The addition of
createGameFeedback: Mockto theMockedUseFetchGamestype is consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. This change correctly reflects the new functionality for creating game feedback.To ensure consistency, please verify that the
createGameFeedbackmethod has been added to the actualuseFetchGamescomposable. Run the following script to check:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful!
The
createGameFeedbackmethod has been successfully added to theuseFetchGamescomposable inapp/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.ts. This addition aligns with the mock definition in the test factory and follows the existing code structure.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of createGameFeedback in useFetchGames composable # Test: Search for createGameFeedback in useFetchGames.ts file rg --type typescript 'createGameFeedback.*=' composables/api/game/useFetchGames.tsLength of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of createGameFeedback in useFetchGames composable # Test: Search for createGameFeedback in useFetchGames.ts file with correct file type rg --type ts 'createGameFeedback.*=' composables/api/game/useFetchGames.tsLength of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the useFetchGames.ts file in the repository fd 'useFetchGames.ts'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of createGameFeedback in the correct useFetchGames composable # Test: Search for createGameFeedback in app/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.ts file rg --type ts 'createGameFeedback.*=' app/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.tsLength of output: 217
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.factory.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM! Verify import consistency across the project.The import path change for
GameEventlooks good and reflects a project restructuring. This change doesn't affect the functionality of thecreateFakeGameEventfunction.To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script to check for any remaining old import paths:
✅ Verification successful
Import path consistency verified.
The change in the import path for
GameEventhas been successfully applied consistently across the project. No remaining old import paths were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths of GameEvent class # Test: Search for the old import path. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript "from ['\"]~/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event\.class['\"]" # Test: Search for the new import path. Expect: Multiple results including this file. rg --type typescript "from ['\"]~/composables/api/game/types/game-event/game-event\.class['\"]"Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths of GameEvent class # Test: Search for the old import path. Expect: No results. rg --type ts "from ['\"]~/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event\.class['\"]" # Test: Search for the new import path. Expect: Multiple results including this file. rg --type ts "from ['\"]~/composables/api/game/types/game-event/game-event\.class['\"]"Length of output: 1157
app/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and follow good practices.The imports from 'class-transformer' and the local constants file are well-chosen for the DTO's functionality. Using 'class-transformer' ensures proper object transformation, while importing constants promotes consistency across the application.
5-13: LGTM: Well-structured DTO class with appropriate property definitions.The
CreateGameFeedbackDtoclass is well-defined with clear and appropriate properties. The use of the@Expose()decorator for each property ensures proper serialization control. The decision to make thereviewproperty optional (review?: string) is a good design choice, allowing for flexibility in feedback submission.
20-20: LGTM: Class export is clear and follows best practices.The export statement for the
CreateGameFeedbackDtoclass is appropriately placed at the end of the file, making the class available for use in other parts of the application. This follows common TypeScript practices.tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.factory.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Correct import for faker library.The import of
fakerfrom "@faker-js/faker" is appropriate for generating mock data in this factory function.
5-5: LGTM: Well-defined function signature.The function signature is clear and appropriate:
- The name
createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDtoaccurately describes the function's purpose.- Using
Partial<CreateGameFeedbackDto>as the parameter type allows for flexible input.- The return type
CreateGameFeedbackDtois correctly specified.
13-13: LGTM: Correct export statement.The named export of
createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDtois appropriate and follows best practices for module exports.
1-13: Overall: Well-implemented factory function with minor improvement opportunities.This file introduces a well-structured and useful factory function for creating fake
CreateGameFeedbackDtoobjects, which will be valuable for testing purposes. The implementation is generally solid, with appropriate use of the faker library and TypeScript features.A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Consider using a more specific import path instead of the
~alias.- Add a default value for the
reviewproperty.- Ensure the
scoreis always an integer.- Add explicit typing to the return value for better type safety.
These suggestions would further enhance the robustness and consistency of the factory function. Great job overall!
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.factory.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Correct import for faker library.The import statement for the faker library is correct and appropriate for generating mock data in tests.
5-5: LGTM: Well-defined function signature.The function signature is clear, concise, and follows good practices:
- Descriptive name that indicates its purpose.
- Optional parameter using Partial for flexibility.
- Correct return type specification.
16-16: LGTM: Correct export statement.The export statement is correct and follows common practices for making the factory function available for use in other parts of the application.
1-16: Overall: Well-implemented factory function for game feedback testing.This file introduces a well-structured and useful factory function for creating fake GameFeedback instances. It correctly uses the faker library to generate random data and allows for flexible partial overrides. The implementation will be valuable for creating diverse test scenarios.
Minor suggestions were made for import path and default value consistency, but these are not critical issues. Great job on implementing this testing utility!
app/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports from 'class-transformer' and the local constants file are correctly used and contribute to the class's functionality and maintainability.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.spec.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly set up, using a factory function for test data creation and importing the DTO class to be tested. This approach promotes clean and maintainable test code.
1-21: Overall, the test file is well-structured and functional.The test file for
CreateGameFeedbackDtois well-written, using TypeScript for type safety and following good testing practices. While there's room for expanding test coverage and making minor improvements, the current implementation provides a solid foundation for testing the DTO class.To further enhance the test suite:
- Add more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.
- Consider testing error handling if applicable to the DTO class.
- Ensure that all public methods and properties of the DTO are adequately tested.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.spec.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for the test file.The import statements are well-structured, importing the necessary factory function for test data and the class under test. Using a factory function for creating test data is a good practice that promotes maintainability and reduces duplication in tests.
4-28: LGTM: Well-structured test suite.The test suite is well-organized using nested
describeblocks, which allows for easy expansion of test cases in the future. The test case follows the AAA (Arrange-Act-Assert) pattern, making it clear and easy to understand.
1-28: Overall: Well-implemented test suite with room for expansion.This test file provides a solid foundation for testing the
GameFeedbackclass. The structure is clear, and the existing test case is well-implemented. To further enhance the test suite:
- Implement additional test cases to cover edge cases and invalid inputs.
- Add explicit type annotations as suggested earlier.
- Consider adding tests for other methods of the
GameFeedbackclass, if any exist.Great job on implementing this test suite! These minor enhancements will make it even more robust.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.vue (2)
1-38: LGTM: Well-structured template with appropriate component usageThe template section is well-structured and makes good use of Vue.js syntax and PrimeVue components. The textarea attributes are set appropriately for auto-resize, max length, and responsiveness. The disabled state is correctly bound to a computed property, and localization is properly implemented for text content.
40-52: LGTM: Well-implemented script section using Composition API and TypeScriptThe script section makes good use of TypeScript and the Composition API. The
defineModelusage for thereviewprop is correct for Vue 3, and the computed property is well-defined using the correct reactive syntax. The overall implementation is clean and follows best practices.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.vue (2)
1-28: Well-structured and responsive template design.The template is well-organized and makes good use of Vue.js features:
- Responsive layout using Flexbox for different screen sizes.
- Proper use of v-model for two-way data binding with child components.
- Clear separation of concerns with dedicated components for rating, error reporting, and review.
The structure promotes maintainability and reusability. Good job!
5-26: Verify form submission handling.The component includes a form, but there's no explicit handling of form submission. Is this intentional? If so, consider adding a comment explaining why. If not, you might want to add a submit handler and emit an event to the parent component.
app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.vue (4)
25-29: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterButton integration looks good.The new
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent is well-integrated into the existing layout. The use of consistent styling classes and proper event binding demonstrates good practices in Vue component composition.
39-40: LGTM: Imports are correctly added.The new imports for the
GameCanceledEmitstype andGameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent are properly placed and follow the existing import style. Good use of TypeScript for type imports.
44-45: LGTM: Emits are properly defined with TypeScript.The use of
defineEmitswith theGameCanceledEmitstype ensures type safety for the component's emitted events. This is a good practice in Vue 3 with TypeScript.
Line range hint
25-52: Overall: Excellent addition of the game feedback feature.The integration of the
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent enhances the user experience by allowing feedback submission after game cancellation. The changes are well-implemented, following Vue 3 and TypeScript best practices. The new component is seamlessly integrated into the existing layout, and the associated logic is correctly implemented.A few points to highlight:
- Consistent styling and layout with existing components.
- Proper use of TypeScript for type safety.
- Clear and descriptive naming conventions.
- Emits are correctly defined and used.
Great job on this feature addition!
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.nuxt.spec.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM: New imports are correctly added.The new imports for
VueVmtype andGameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent are correctly placed and follow the existing import style. These additions suggest that theGameCanceledcomponent now includes a feedback submission feature.Also applies to: 8-8
Line range hint
1-44: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage and well-structured test file.The test file now provides comprehensive coverage for the
GameCanceledcomponent, including:
- Snapshot testing
- Head title and meta tags verification
- Translated text display
- New feedback submitter button functionality
The addition of the new test case for the Game Feedback Submitter Button integrates well with the existing structure, maintaining a clean and organized test file.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue (1)
1-53: Great job on implementing the GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError component!The component is well-structured, follows Vue.js best practices, and effectively utilizes TypeScript, Pinia for state management, and the Composition API. The use of translations for internationalization and dynamic styling for user feedback is commendable.
A few minor suggestions were provided to further enhance accessibility and performance, but overall, this is a solid implementation that should integrate well with the game feedback submission feature.
app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.vue (3)
24-27: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component added correctly.The new GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component is well-integrated into the template. It follows the existing naming conventions for id attributes and event handling, maintaining consistency with other components in the file.
35-35: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterButton import added correctly.The import statement for the new GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component is properly placed among other component imports and follows the project's import path conventions.
58-60: LGTM: New event handler function added correctly.The
onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonfunction is well-implemented. It follows the established naming conventions and event handling patterns used in the component.app/composables/api/game/types/game.class.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-89: Approve overall changes to the Game class.The modifications to the
Gameclass are well-implemented and align with the PR objective of adding game feedback functionality. The changes are additive and maintain backward compatibility with the existing class structure.The new
feedbackproperty enhances theGameclass by allowing associated feedback, while the updated import path forGameEventsuggests improved project organization. These changes contribute positively to the evolving structure of the game system.
3-3: Verify consistency of GameEvent import path change.The import path for
GameEventhas been updated to a more specific location. This change suggests a project structure reorganization.Please run the following script to ensure this change is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Retrying import path verification with corrected file type specifications.
Please run the following script to ensure the
GameEventimport path change is consistent across the codebase:
GameEvent import path change is consistent across the codebase.
All instances of the old import path have been successfully removed, and the new import path is used consistently throughout the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths for GameEvent # Test: Search for the old import path. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript 'from "~/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.class"' # Test: Verify the new import path is used consistently. Expect: Consistent usage across files. rg --type typescript 'from "~/composables/api/game/types/game-event/game-event.class"'Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths for GameEvent and verify the new import path usage. # Test: Search for the old import path. Expect: No results. rg --glob '*.ts' 'from "~/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.class"' # Test: Verify the new import path is used consistently. Expect: Consistent usage across files. rg --glob '*.ts' 'from "~/composables/api/game/types/game-event/game-event.class"'Length of output: 1139
app/plugins/vue-font-awesome-icon/vue-font-awesome-icon.ts (3)
10-10: LGTM: New icon imports added correctlyThe new imports for
faBug,faQuestionCircle, andfaStar as faStarRegularhave been added correctly. These additions align with the PR objectives and provide more icon options for the game feedback feature.Also applies to: 83-86
97-97: LGTM: New icons added to library correctlyThe newly imported icons (
faBug,faQuestionCircle, andfaStarRegular) have been correctly added to thelibrary.add()call. This ensures they are available for use in the application. The alphabetical order has been maintained, which is good for code organization.Also applies to: 161-161
Line range hint
1-177: Summary: Icon additions align well with PR objectivesThe changes made to this file successfully enhance the icon library by adding new icons (
faBug,faQuestionCircle, andfaStarRegular) that are relevant to the game feedback submitter feature. The modifications are consistent, follow the existing code structure, and maintain good organization. These additions will support the implementation of the game feedback functionality as intended in the PR objectives.app/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement for CreateGameFeedbackDto is correct.The import statement for
CreateGameFeedbackDtois properly placed and follows the established naming and import conventions in the file.
12-12: LGTM: New method in UseFetchGames type is well-defined.The
createGameFeedbackmethod is correctly added to theUseFetchGamestype. It maintains consistency with other methods in terms of parameter types and return type.
56-65: LGTM: Implementation of createGameFeedback is correct and consistent.The
createGameFeedbackfunction is well-implemented:
- It follows the established pattern of other methods in the file.
- Proper use of async/await and try-catch for error handling.
- Correct use of the fetchWerewolvesAssistantApi function for the API call.
- The function is correctly added to the returned object.
Also applies to: 71-71
1-1: Summary: Game feedback functionality successfully implemented.The changes to
useFetchGames.tseffectively introduce the ability to submit game feedback:
- Proper import of the necessary DTO.
- Correct type definition in the
UseFetchGamesinterface.- Well-implemented
createGameFeedbackfunction following established patterns.These changes enhance the composable's functionality while maintaining consistency with the existing codebase.
Also applies to: 12-12, 56-65, 71-71
app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.vue (3)
17-18: LGTM: Improved event handling in GameOverActionsThe changes to the event listeners provide more granular control and improve the clarity of the component's behavior. The new
@game-feedback-submitter-button-clickand@game-history-button-clickevents are well-named and correspond to their respective handler functions.
41-42: LGTM: Typed emit definitionExcellent use of the
GameOverEmitstype withdefineEmits. This ensures type safety for the component's emitted events and improves the overall robustness of the code.
Line range hint
1-89: Overall assessment: Solid improvements to GameOver componentThe changes to this component are well-implemented and contribute to the new game feedback submission feature. Key improvements include:
- More granular event handling in the template.
- Improved type safety with the addition of
GameOverEmits.- Clear and purposeful updates to event handler functions.
These changes enhance the component's functionality and maintainability. Great job on implementing these improvements!
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.nuxt.spec.ts (2)
1-11: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are well-structured, using type imports where appropriate, and include all necessary testing utilities and custom helpers. This setup provides a solid foundation for the test suite.
1-68: Overall: Well-written and comprehensive test suite.This test file for the GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component is well-structured, follows testing best practices, and provides good coverage of the component's functionality. The use of factory functions, helper methods, and appropriate assertions contributes to the maintainability and reliability of the tests.
The suggestions provided earlier for minor improvements in type safety and additional test cases will further enhance the robustness of this test suite. Great job on creating a solid foundation for ensuring the reliability of the GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component!
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
1-81: Overall excellent test coverage with room for minor enhancements.This test file for the GameFeedbackSubmitterReview component is well-structured and comprehensive. It covers key aspects of the component's functionality, including rendering, prop handling, user interaction, and state management.
Key strengths:
- Good use of TypeScript and Vue Test Utils.
- Well-organized test setup with reusable mounting function.
- Comprehensive coverage of textarea functionality.
- Appropriate use of Pinia store for testing different states.
Areas for potential improvement:
- Grouping imports for better readability.
- Expanding default props for more thorough testing.
- Using translation keys instead of hardcoded text in label tests.
- Adding a test for input length validation if applicable.
These enhancements will further improve the maintainability and robustness of the test suite. Great job on writing thorough tests for this component!
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game.class.spec.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement forcreateFakeGameFeedbackis correctly added.The new import statement is appropriately placed and follows the project's import conventions. This addition aligns well with the introduction of the feedback property in the
Gameclass.
Line range hint
1-107: Overall, the changes to theGameclass test suite are well-implemented.The modifications consistently introduce and test the new
feedbackproperty across both thecreateandtoJSONtest cases. These changes ensure that theGameclass correctly handles the new feedback submission feature in its creation and serialization processes.The updates maintain the existing code structure and testing patterns, which is commendable. The minor suggestions provided for improved readability and consistency will further enhance the quality of the test suite.
Great job on thoroughly updating the tests to accommodate the new feature!
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts (3)
1-12: Imports look good and cover all necessary dependencies.The imports are well-organized and include all the required types and utilities for testing a Vue component. Good job on importing custom utilities and factories, which will help in creating more maintainable and readable tests.
36-39: Snapshot test is correctly implemented.The snapshot test is well-implemented, checking both the existence of the wrapper and matching the snapshot. This will help catch any unexpected changes in the component's rendering.
1-76: Overall, excellent test implementation with room for minor enhancements.This test file for the GameFeedbackSubmitterContent component is well-structured, comprehensive, and follows Vue testing best practices. The tests cover important aspects of the component's functionality, including prop passing and event handling.
Key strengths:
- Well-organized imports and test setup
- Use of factory functions for creating test data
- Comprehensive coverage of component functionality
- Good use of Vue Test Utils for component interaction
Areas for potential improvement:
- Enhancing type safety for accessing component ViewModel
- Improving test isolation
- Extracting some setup logic into reusable functions
These minor enhancements will further improve the maintainability and robustness of the test suite. Great job on creating a solid foundation for testing this component!
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.nuxt.spec.ts (4)
1-9: LGTM: New imports enhance test capabilitiesThe added imports provide necessary testing utilities, types, and components for the updated test suite. They are well-organized and follow a consistent style.
40-41: LGTM: Consistent use of updated mounting functionThe test case for rendering without shallowing now uses the updated
mountGameOverActionsComponentfunction, maintaining consistency across the test suite.
85-86: LGTM: Updated emit event nameThe emitted event name has been changed from "showGameHistory" to "gameHistoryButtonClick". This new name is more descriptive and follows a consistent naming convention, improving the clarity of the component's API.
Line range hint
1-94: Overall: Excellent improvements to the GameOverActions test suiteThe changes in this file significantly enhance the test suite for the GameOverActions component. Key improvements include:
- Updated imports and test setup for better integration with Pinia and new components.
- More flexible mounting options with the updated
mountGameOverActionsComponentfunction.- Improved test isolation with the new
beforeEachhook in the "Show Game History Button" section.- Updated and new emit tests that align with the component's evolving functionality.
These changes result in a more robust and maintainable test suite that better reflects the component's behavior and API. The modifications are well-implemented and consistent with best practices for Vue component testing.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.spec.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement is correctly placed and consistent.The new import for
createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDtois appropriately placed and follows the existing import style in the file.tests/unit/specs/stores/game/useGameStore.spec.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM: New import for game feedback DTO factory.The import for
createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDtois correctly placed and follows the existing naming conventions.
18-18: LGTM: New mock function for createGameFeedback.The
createGameFeedbackmock function is correctly added to theuseFetchGamesobject in the hoisted mocks. This addition aligns with the new functionality for creating game feedback.
Line range hint
1-185: Overall: Well-integrated and comprehensive changes for game feedback functionality.The additions for game feedback functionality are well-integrated into the existing test suite. The new imports, mock functions, and test cases are consistent with the established patterns and provide thorough coverage of the new feature.
Great job on maintaining code quality and test coverage while introducing new functionality!
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.nuxt.spec.ts (3)
53-59: LGTM: Improved mock structureThe restructuring of the
mocksobject enhances clarity by explicitly nesting theshowGameHistorymock withincomponents.gameOverHistory. This change improves readability without altering functionality.
187-188: LGTM: Consistent event name updateThe event name change from "show-game-history" to "game-history-button-click" is consistent with the previous test case. The error handling logic remains intact.
192-201: LGTM: New test for game feedback submitterThe addition of this test case enhances coverage by verifying the game feedback submission feature. The test structure is consistent with other tests in the file.
To ensure the component implementation aligns with this test, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the game feedback submitter implementation in the GameOverActions component # Test: Search for the game feedback submitter button and event emission in the component file rg --type vue -A 5 'game-feedback-submitter-button-click' components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.vue # Test: Check for the presence of a method or computed property related to game feedback submission rg --type vue -A 5 'gameFeedbackSubmitter' components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.vuemodules/i18n/locales/en.json (6)
1651-1653: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterButton implementationThe implementation for the GameFeedbackSubmitterButton looks good. The key and its value are appropriately defined.
1654-1656: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitter implementationThe GameFeedbackSubmitter key and its value are correctly implemented.
1657-1661: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter implementationThe GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter section is well-structured with appropriate keys for submit action, submission confirmation, and a thank you message.
1662-1670: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterRating implementationThe GameFeedbackSubmitterRating section is comprehensive, including a question, a prompt to choose a rating, and a range of rating options from "Terrible" to "Excellent".
1671-1674: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterReview implementationThe GameFeedbackSubmitterReview section is well-implemented with a prompt for a quick review and a note about its optional nature.
1675-1679: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError implementationThe GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError section is properly implemented with a question about the game's stability and options for user response.
modules/i18n/locales/fr.json (3)
1651-1678: New game feedback sections look good!The newly added sections for the game feedback feature (GameFeedbackSubmitterButton, GameFeedbackSubmitter, GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter, GameFeedbackSubmitterRating, GameFeedbackSubmitterReview, GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError) are well-structured and provide appropriate French translations. The language used is consistent with the rest of the file and suitable for a feedback system.
Line range hint
1-1678: JSON structure is valid and well-formattedThe overall JSON structure of the file is correct. All keys are properly quoted, and there are no trailing commas. The file follows proper JSON formatting guidelines, which is crucial for parsing and using these translations in the application.
Line range hint
1-1678: Overall, excellent work on the French translationsThe French translations in this file are comprehensive and well-structured. The newly added game feedback sections are complete and consistent with the rest of the file. The JSON structure is valid and properly formatted.
A minor suggestion would be to adopt a consistent capitalization approach for section names throughout the file for improved maintainability.
Great job on keeping the translations up-to-date with the new features!
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.vue (1)
1-82: LGTM!The component is well-structured and follows best practices. The integration with Vue's Composition API, the use of reactive properties, and state management with Pinia are correctly implemented.
app/pages/game/[id].vue (1)
23-36: Verify that all components emitgame-feedback-submitter-button-clickeventYou've added an event listener
@game-feedback-submitter-button-click="onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButton"to the dynamic component<Component :is="gameStatusComponentToRender" />. Please ensure that all components that can be rendered bygameStatusComponentToRenderemit thegame-feedback-submitter-button-clickevent. Otherwise, this may cause unnecessary event listeners or potential errors if the event is emitted unexpectedly.Run the following script to verify which components emit this event:
app/stores/game/useGameStore.ts (5)
4-4: ImportCreateGameFeedbackDtocorrectly addedThe
CreateGameFeedbackDtotype is properly imported, enabling type safety for the feedback creation functionality.
17-17: DestructurecreateGameFeedbackfrom API functionsThe
createGameFeedbackFromApifunction is correctly destructured fromuseFetchGames(), making it available within the store.
28-28: InitializecreatingGameFeedbackStatusreactive referenceThe reactive reference
creatingGameFeedbackStatusis initialized with a default value of"idle", which will track the status of the feedback creation process.
96-96: ExposecreatingGameFeedbackStatusin the storeThe
creatingGameFeedbackStatusis correctly added to the returned object, making the status accessible to components that use this store.
102-102: ExposecreateGameFeedbackmethod in the storeThe
createGameFeedbackfunction is properly added to the store's return object, allowing components to initiate the feedback creation process.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.vue (1)
58-58: Verify the usage ofdefineModelmacroThe
defineModelmacro is used to define a model property. Ensure that your project setup includes the necessary configuration to support this macro, typically provided byunplugin-vue-macros.tests/unit/specs/pages/game/game-page.nuxt.spec.ts (5)
4-6: Approved: Necessary imports addedThe added import statements for
Mock,beforeEach, andRefare appropriate for the updated tests.
8-11: Approved: Additional imports enhance test utilitiesThe imports for
VueVm,mountSuspendedComponent,getError, andcreateFakeUseRouteimprove the test setup and are correctly implemented.
24-30: Ensure correct typing of mock functionsThe
Mocktype fromvitestis used to typeshowGameFeedbackSubmitter. Please verify thatMockis the appropriate type. If you encounter issues, consider importingSpyInstancefromvitestand using it for typing mock functions.
38-44: Approved: Initialization of mocks objectThe
mocksobject is correctly initialized in thebeforeEachhook, providing mock implementations for component methods.
141-163: Approved: Added test cases improve coverageThe new test cases under "Game is found" effectively cover the interaction with the
GameFeedbackSubmittercomponent and handle both success and error scenarios appropriately.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
113-113: Verify custom matcher usageThe matcher
toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWithis not a standard Jest or Vue Test Utils matcher. Ensure that this matcher is defined or imported correctly in your testing environment.If it's a custom matcher, make sure it's added via
expect.extend. Otherwise, consider using:expect(gameStore.createGameFeedback).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); expect(gameStore.createGameFeedback).toHaveBeenCalledWith(defaultCreateGameFeedbackDto);tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
78-84: Ensure 'null' value handling in rating change eventWhen emitting a change event with
{ value: null }, the expected behavior is to reset the rating. However, the assertion checks for"0"as themodel-value, which may not correctly reflect the component's handling ofnullvalues.Please verify that the component converts
nullto0as intended. If the component should handlenulldifferently, adjust the test to reflect the correct behavior.
.../factories/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.factory.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...eedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...eedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...eedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (63)
app/components/pages/game/GameOver/game-over.types.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for clarity.The
GameOverEmitstype is well-defined and correctly exported. The use of an empty tuple forgameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickaccurately represents an event without payload.Consider adding a brief comment to explain the purpose of this type, especially for other developers who might work on this code in the future. For example:
/** * Defines the emitted events for the GameOver component. */ type GameOverEmits = { /** * Emitted when the game feedback submitter button is clicked. * This event doesn't carry any payload. */ gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: []; }; export type { GameOverEmits };This addition would enhance code readability and maintainability.
app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/game-canceled.types.ts (1)
1-3: Consider usingvoidfor better type safety.While using an empty array
[]works, it's more common and type-safe to usevoidfor events that don't emit any value.Here's a suggested improvement:
type GameCanceledEmits = { - gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: []; + gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: () => void; };This change makes it explicit that the event handler doesn't expect any arguments and doesn't return anything.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/game-feedback-submitter-rating.types.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Consider adding constraints and documentation.The type definition and its export are correctly implemented. However, I have a few suggestions to enhance its usability and maintainability:
- Consider adding constraints to the
modelValueproperty to ensure valid ratings. For example:modelValue: number & { __brand: 'Rating' };Then define a type guard function in a separate utility file:
function isValidRating(value: number): value is number & { __brand: 'Rating' } { return Number.isInteger(value) && value >= 1 && value <= 5; // Adjust range as needed }
- Add documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this type:
/** * Props for the GameFeedbackSubmitterRating component. * @property modelValue - The current rating value. Should be an integer between 1 and 5 (or your preferred range). */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterRatingProps = { modelValue: number & { __brand: 'Rating' }; };
- The file name is quite long. Consider shortening it or restructuring your folders to reduce nesting.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/game-feedback-submitter-review.types.ts (1)
2-2: Consider clarifying the purpose ofmodelValue.The purpose of
modelValueis not immediately clear from its name. Consider adding a comment to explain its usage or using a more descriptive name (e.g.,reviewTextorfeedbackContent) if appropriate.app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/game-over-actions.types.ts (1)
1-3: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for consistency.The changes to
GameOverActionsEmitstype look good and align with the PR objectives. The new event emittersgameHistoryButtonClickandgameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickappropriately replace the removedshowGameHistoryevent, reflecting the updated functionality.For consistency in naming convention, consider renaming the events to use the format
onEventName. This would make them:type GameOverActionsEmits = { onGameHistoryButtonClick: []; onGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: []; };This naming convention is commonly used in Vue.js and other frameworks to clearly indicate event handlers.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/game-feedback-submitter-button.types.ts (1)
1-5: Consider adjusting the property name for consistencyThe property name
gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickis descriptive but quite long. For consistency with Vue's naming conventions and to avoid redundancy, consider shortening it to justclick. This would make the usage more concise while still maintaining clarity within the context of the component.Here's a suggested modification:
type GameFeedbackSubmitterButtonEmits = { - gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick: []; + click: []; }; export type { GameFeedbackSubmitterButtonEmits };This change would align better with Vue's event naming conventions and make the code more maintainable.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error.types.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc for better documentation.The type definition is clear, concise, and follows good naming conventions. The boolean type for
hasEncounteredErroris appropriate for representing an error state.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to explain the purpose of this type and its property. For example:
/** * Props for the GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError component. * @property {boolean} hasEncounteredError - Indicates whether an error has been encountered during feedback submission. */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredErrorProps = { hasEncounteredError: boolean; };app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/game-feedback-submitter-content.types.ts (2)
3-5: LGTM: Type definition is clear and follows conventions.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterContentPropstype is well-defined and follows TypeScript naming conventions. The use ofCreateGameFeedbackDtofor themodelValueproperty suggests this is for creating new game feedback entries.Consider adding a brief comment above the type definition to explain its purpose, e.g.:
/** * Props for the GameFeedbackSubmitterContent component. * Used with v-model to manage the state of a new game feedback entry. */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterContentProps = { modelValue: CreateGameFeedbackDto; };This would provide more context for other developers working with this type.
1-9: Overall: Well-structured and purpose-driven type definition file.This file introduces a clear and concise type definition for the game feedback submitter component. It follows TypeScript best practices in terms of naming conventions, import/export syntax, and type definitions. The code is well-organized and serves its purpose effectively.
As the game feedback feature evolves, consider the following architectural suggestions:
- If the feedback system grows more complex, consider creating a dedicated
typesfolder within theGameFeedbackSubmittercomponent folder to house all related type definitions.- Document any constraints or validations that should be applied to the
CreateGameFeedbackDtoin the component that uses this type, to ensure data integrity.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/game-feedback-submitter-footer.types.ts (1)
7-9: LGTM with a minor suggestion:GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterEmitstype is well-defined.The type correctly defines an emit event without payload, following Vue 3 composition API best practices. For improved clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the empty array.
Consider adding a comment for clarity:
type GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterEmits = { - closeDialog: []; + closeDialog: []; // Event emitted without payload };tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.factory.ts (1)
5-11: LGTM: Well-structured factory function with a minor suggestion.The
createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDtofunction is well-implemented:
- It allows partial overrides, which is flexible for various test scenarios.
- The use of
fakerfor random values enhances test data variety.- The score is correctly constrained between 1 and 5.
- The nullish coalescing operator (
??) is appropriately used for fallback values.Minor suggestion: Consider providing a default value for the
reviewproperty, similar toscoreandhasEncounteredError. This would ensure all properties have mock data when not explicitly provided.You could modify line 8 as follows:
- review: createGameFeedbackDto.review, + review: createGameFeedbackDto.review ?? faker.lorem.sentence(),This change would provide a random sentence as a default review when not specified.
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.factory.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Correct import for GameFeedback class.The import of
GameFeedbackfrom the local path is appropriate. However, consider using an absolute import path for better maintainability.Consider updating the import to use an absolute path:
-import { GameFeedback } from "~/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class"; +import { GameFeedback } from "@/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class";
6-13: LGTM: Well-implemented factory function with a minor suggestion.The function body is well-implemented, using
GameFeedback.createand the nullish coalescing operator to provide flexibility in creating fake data. However, the 'review' field is not given a default value.Consider providing a default value for the 'review' field, unless it's intentionally left undefined:
- review: gameFeedback.review, + review: gameFeedback.review ?? faker.lorem.paragraph(),app/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.ts (1)
5-22: Consider renaming the_idproperty for clarity.The
_idproperty uses an underscore prefix, which typically indicates a private or internal property in some coding conventions. However, it's marked with@Expose(), suggesting it's meant to be public. To improve clarity and consistency:
- If this is indeed a public property, consider renaming it to
idwithout the underscore.- If it's meant to be internal or private, consider using TypeScript's private modifier (
private id: string;) instead of the underscore convention.This change would enhance code readability and align with typical TypeScript practices.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.spec.ts (2)
6-19: LGTM with suggestions: Good basic test, but could be more comprehensive.The test case effectively checks the basic functionality of the
createmethod:
- Uses a factory function for input, which is good for maintainability.
- Compares the result with an expected output using
toStrictEqual.However, consider the following improvements:
- Instead of manually creating the expected DTO, consider using the factory function for both input and expected output. This would make the test more resilient to changes in the DTO structure.
- Add test cases for edge cases and invalid inputs to ensure robust error handling.
- Consider parameterized tests to cover various input scenarios more efficiently.
Here's a suggested refactor for the test case:
import { createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDto } from "@tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.factory"; import { CreateGameFeedbackDto } from "~/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto"; describe("Create Game Feedback Dto", () => { describe("create", () => { it.each([ { score: 5, review: "Great game!", hasEncounteredError: false }, { score: 1, review: "Terrible experience", hasEncounteredError: true }, { score: 3, review: "", hasEncounteredError: false }, ])("should create game feedback dto when called with %p", (input) => { const gameFeedbackDto = createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDto(input); const createdGameFeedbackDto = CreateGameFeedbackDto.create(gameFeedbackDto); expect(createdGameFeedbackDto).toBeInstanceOf(CreateGameFeedbackDto); expect(createdGameFeedbackDto).toEqual(expect.objectContaining(input)); }); it("should throw an error when called with invalid input", () => { const invalidInput = { score: 6, review: "Invalid score" }; expect(() => CreateGameFeedbackDto.create(invalidInput)).toThrow(); }); }); });This refactor introduces parameterized tests and an additional test for invalid input, providing more comprehensive coverage.
1-21: Overall: Good foundation for testing, with room for enhancement.This test file provides a solid foundation for testing the
CreateGameFeedbackDtoclass:
- Well-structured with clear
describeblocks.- Uses factory functions for creating test data.
- Covers the basic functionality of the
createmethod.To further improve the test suite:
- Implement the suggested refactoring to use parameterized tests.
- Add more test cases to cover edge cases and error scenarios.
- Consider testing any additional methods or properties of the
CreateGameFeedbackDtoclass.These enhancements will lead to more robust and comprehensive test coverage, ensuring the reliability of the
CreateGameFeedbackDtoclass as the project evolves.tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.spec.ts (1)
6-26: LGTM: Good basic test case. Consider adding more test scenarios.The test case effectively verifies the basic functionality of the
GameFeedback.createmethod. It uses appropriate test data generation and comparison methods.To improve test coverage, consider adding the following test cases:
- Test with minimum required fields (if any are optional).
- Test with invalid inputs (e.g., negative score, invalid date).
- Test with edge cases (e.g., maximum score, very long review).
Would you like me to provide examples of these additional test cases?
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.vue (3)
1-19: Consider removing the icon animation.The template structure looks good, and the use of internationalization for the button label is commendable. However, the
beat-fadeanimation on the star icon might be unnecessary and potentially distracting to users. Consider removing this animation for a cleaner, more professional look.You can remove the animation by deleting the
beat-fadeattribute:<FontAwesomeIcon - beat-fade icon="star" />
21-38: Approved with a minor suggestion for error handling.The script section is well-structured and follows Vue 3 Composition API best practices. The use of TypeScript, Pinia store, and computed properties is appropriate. However, consider adding error handling when accessing the game store to improve robustness.
You could add a simple error check:
const gameStore = useGameStore(); const { game } = storeToRefs(gameStore); const isButtonVisible = computed<boolean>(() => { if (!game.value) { console.error('Game data is not available'); return false; } return !game.value.feedback; });This ensures that the component gracefully handles cases where game data might not be available.
1-38: Approved: Well-implemented component with a suggestion for documentation.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent is well-structured and follows Vue 3 and TypeScript best practices. It effectively integrates with the Pinia store and uses internationalization. The component's purpose and functionality are clear from its implementation.To further improve the component:
Consider adding a brief comment at the top of the file describing the component's purpose and any important notes for other developers. For example:
<!-- GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.vue This component renders a button for submitting game feedback. It is conditionally displayed based on whether the current game has existing feedback. When clicked, it emits a 'gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick' event. --> <template> <!-- ... existing template ... --> </template> <script setup lang="ts"> // ... existing script ... </script>This documentation will help other developers quickly understand the component's purpose and behavior.
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game.factory.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM! Consider adding a type for thefeedbackproperty.The addition of the
feedbackproperty is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objective. It follows the existing patterns in the function and maintains consistency with other properties.For improved type safety and consistency with other properties, consider adding a type for the
feedbackproperty in theGameclass, if not already present.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.vue (2)
1-37: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label for improved accessibility.The template structure is well-organized and follows Vue.js best practices. The use of labels and proper attribute binding enhances usability and accessibility.
To further improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto the textarea:<PrimeVueTextarea id="game-feedback-submitter-review-input" v-model="review" auto-resize cols="30" :disabled="isReviewTextareaDisabled" fluid max-length="1000" rows="5" + :aria-label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.quickReview')" />
40-52: LGTM! Consider adding explicit type for store ref.The script section effectively uses the Composition API with TypeScript, and the reactive bindings are well-implemented.
To improve type safety, consider adding an explicit type for the
creatingGameFeedbackStatusref:-const { creatingGameFeedbackStatus } = storeToRefs(gameStore); +const { creatingGameFeedbackStatus } = storeToRefs(gameStore) as { + creatingGameFeedbackStatus: Ref<"idle" | "pending" | "success" | "error">; +};This change ensures that the
creatingGameFeedbackStatusref has a well-defined type, which can help prevent potential runtime errors and improve code maintainability.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.vue (3)
1-28: LGTM! Consider adding a submit button.The template structure is well-organized and uses appropriate Vue.js practices. The use of flexbox for responsive layout and v-model for data binding is commendable.
Consider adding a submit button and a method to handle form submission. This would complete the user interaction flow for submitting feedback.
Example:
<PrimeVueButton label="Submit Feedback" @click="submitFeedback" class="mt-4" />
30-37: LGTM! Consider adding a submit method.The script section is well-structured, using Vue 3 composition API with TypeScript. The use of
defineModelforcreateGameFeedbackDtois a good practice for two-way binding in Vue 3.Consider adding a method to handle form submission. This method could validate the feedback data and emit an event to the parent component or call an API directly. For example:
const emit = defineEmits(['submit']); const submitFeedback = () => { // Perform any necessary validation if (isValid(createGameFeedbackDto.value)) { emit('submit', createGameFeedbackDto.value); } };Don't forget to add the corresponding event listener in the parent component if you choose to emit an event.
1-37: Great work on the feedback component! Consider these enhancements.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterContentcomponent is well-structured and follows Vue 3 best practices. Here are some suggestions to further improve it:
- Implement form submission functionality (as mentioned in previous comments).
- Enhance accessibility by adding appropriate ARIA attributes and ensuring keyboard navigation.
- Consider adding input validation to ensure data quality.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these enhancements? I can provide code examples or open a GitHub issue to track these improvements.
app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.vue (1)
25-29: Consider i18n for the feedback button textWhile the implementation looks good, ensure that the text for the new feedback button is properly internationalized. If it's hardcoded in the
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent, consider moving it to the i18n system for consistency with other UI elements.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.nuxt.spec.ts (2)
36-44: LGTM: New test block is well-structured and comprehensive.The new test block for the "Game Feedback Submitter Button" is well-structured and follows the project's testing conventions. It correctly tests the emission of the
gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickevent.Consider adding a test to verify that the button is rendered correctly:
it("should render the game feedback submitter button", () => { const button = wrapper.findComponent<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterButton>("#game-feedback-submitter-button"); expect(button.exists()).toBe(true); });This additional test would ensure that the button is present in the component before testing its functionality.
Line range hint
1-44: Consider adding a test for the feedback submitter button's properties.The test file now provides good coverage for the
GameCanceledcomponent, including rendering, head tags, text display, and the new feedback submitter button functionality. To further enhance the test coverage, consider adding a test to verify the properties of theGameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent.Here's a suggested additional test:
it("should pass correct props to the game feedback submitter button", () => { const button = wrapper.findComponent<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterButton>("#game-feedback-submitter-button"); expect(button.props()).toEqual({ // Add expected props here, e.g.: // variant: "primary", // size: "medium", }); });This test would ensure that the
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtonreceives the correct props from theGameCanceledcomponent.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue (2)
1-35: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for improved accessibility.The template structure and layout are well-organized and appropriate for the component's purpose. The use of internationalization for text content is a good practice. The toggle button implementation is correct, with proper binding and conditional classes.
To further improve accessibility, consider adding ARIA attributes to the toggle button, such as
aria-pressedfor the current state andaria-labelfor a more descriptive label when needed.Here's a suggestion for adding ARIA attributes to the PrimeVueToggleButton:
<PrimeVueToggleButton id="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-input" v-model="hasEncounteredError" class="!border-0" :class="toggleButtonClasses" :disabled="isToggleButtonDisabled" :off-label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.gameWasStable')" :on-label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.gameEncounteredError')" + :aria-pressed="hasEncounteredError" + :aria-label="$t('components.GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.toggleButtonAriaLabel')" > <!-- ... --> </PrimeVueToggleButton>Make sure to add the corresponding translation key for the aria-label in your localization files.
37-53: LGTM! Consider memoizing the computed properties for potential performance gains.The script section is well-structured and follows Vue 3 Composition API best practices. The use of TypeScript,
defineModel, and Pinia for state management is commendable. The computed properties are used effectively for dynamic values.To potentially optimize performance, especially if this component is used in a list or frequently re-rendered, consider memoizing the computed properties using
computedwith a callback that returns a memoized function.Here's an example of how you could memoize the
toggleButtonClassescomputed property:import { computed, memoize } from 'vue' // ... other code ... const toggleButtonClasses = computed(() => memoize((value: boolean) => value ? "!bg-error border-error" : "!bg-success") )(hasEncounteredError)This approach can be applied to other computed properties if needed. However, make sure to profile your application to ensure this optimization is necessary and beneficial in your specific use case.
app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.vue (2)
24-27: LGTM! Consider aligning button order with visual hierarchy.The addition of the
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objective. The event naming convention is consistent with Vue best practices.Consider placing the feedback button before the history button to align with a typical user flow: submit feedback, then optionally view history. This order might provide a better user experience.
55-60: LGTM! Consider unifying function naming convention.The changes in event handling are well-implemented:
- The emit name change for the history button improves naming consistency.
- The new function for the feedback submitter button is correctly implemented.
For better consistency, consider renaming
onClickFromShowHistoryButtontoonClickFromGameHistoryButton. This would align it with the naming pattern used inonClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButton.app/composables/api/game/types/game.class.ts (1)
52-54: LGTM: Newfeedbackproperty added toGameclassThe new
feedbackproperty is well-implemented with appropriate type, decorators, and placement within the class. It allows for optional game feedback, which aligns with the PR objectives.For consistency with other nullable properties in the class (e.g.,
currentPlay), consider initializingfeedbacktonull:@Type(() => GameFeedback) @Expose() public feedback: GameFeedback | null = null;This minor change would ensure that new
Gameinstances have a consistent initial state for thefeedbackproperty.app/plugins/vue-font-awesome-icon/vue-font-awesome-icon.ts (1)
83-86: LGTM: New regular icon import and restructured imports.The addition of
faStarRegularand the restructuring of imports are well-done. This change provides more icon options for the feedback feature and correctly organizes imports by package.For consistency, consider using the same import style for both icons:
import { faQuestionCircle, faStar as faStarRegular, } from "@fortawesome/free-regular-svg-icons";app/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.ts (1)
56-65: LGTM: Implementation of createGameFeedback functionThe
createGameFeedbackfunction is well-implemented and consistent with other methods in the file. It correctly uses thefetchWerewolvesAssistantApimethod, constructs the endpoint properly, and handles errors by returning null.Consider adding error logging in the catch block for debugging purposes. For example:
} catch (error) { + console.error('Error creating game feedback:', error); return null; }app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.vue (2)
70-79: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Methods updated and added correctlyThe changes to the methods are well-implemented:
onShowGameHistoryFromGameOverActionshas been renamed toonClickFromGameHistoryButton, which is more descriptive and consistent with the new event naming.- The new
onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonmethod has been added to handle the feedback submission event.Both methods follow a consistent naming convention and align with the changes made in the template section.
Consider adding a comment above the
onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonmethod to briefly explain its purpose, similar to how you might document an API endpoint. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:/** * Emits the gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick event when the feedback submitter button is clicked. * This event can be used by parent components to show a feedback submission form or modal. */ function onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButton(): void { emit("gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick"); }
Line range hint
1-89: Overall assessment: Well-implemented feature additionThe changes in this file successfully implement the game feedback submitter feature as described in the PR objectives. The modifications follow Vue.js and TypeScript best practices, including proper event handling, type safety, and consistent naming conventions. The code is clean, readable, and maintains the existing structure of the component while adding new functionality.
To further improve the component's architecture and maintainability, consider the following suggestions for future iterations:
If the feedback submission logic becomes more complex, consider extracting it into a separate composable function (e.g.,
useFeedbackSubmission) to keep the component focused on presentation logic.As the number of actions in
GameOverActionsgrows, you might want to implement a more scalable approach for handling different action types, such as using a strategy pattern or a map of action types to handler functions.These suggestions are not critical for the current implementation but could be beneficial for long-term maintainability as the feature evolves.
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
55-59: LGTM: Button label test is implemented correctly.The test effectively verifies that the button displays the correct label. This is crucial for ensuring a good user experience.
Consider adding a test to verify that the label is correctly translated if you're using a translation library. This could involve mocking the translation function and ensuring it's called with the correct key.
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts (4)
11-32: LGTM: Well-structured test setup with room for minor improvement.The test setup is well-organized, using appropriate describe blocks, default props, and a flexible mounting function. The
beforeEachhook ensures a clean state for each test.Consider adding a type annotation for the
wrappervariable to improve code readability:let wrapper: ReturnType<typeof mount<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterReview>>;
34-37: LGTM: Snapshot test is implemented correctly.The snapshot test effectively checks for the component's existence and its rendered HTML structure. This will help detect any unintended changes in the component's output.
Consider adding an assertion to check if the component is a Vue instance for an extra layer of validation:
expect(wrapper.vm).toBeTruthy();
39-45: LGTM: Label translation test is implemented, but could be more robust.The test correctly checks the label's text content against the expected translation.
To make the test more resilient to translation changes, consider using a translation key instead of a hardcoded string:
import { useI18n } from "vue-i18n"; // Inside the test const i18n = useI18n(); expect(label.text()).toBe(i18n.t("game.feedback.review.label"));This approach ensures that the test remains valid even if the translation text changes, as long as the translation key remains the same.
47-80: LGTM: Comprehensive textarea tests with room for minor improvement.The tests cover essential aspects of the textarea functionality, including model value handling and disabling behavior based on the game feedback creation status. The use of
nextTickfor handling asynchronous updates is correct.For consistency, consider using
toBeTruthy()andtoBeFalsy()instead of comparing with string values for boolean attributes:// Replace expect(textarea.attributes("disabled")).toBe("true"); // With expect(textarea.attributes("disabled")).toBeTruthy(); // Replace expect(textarea.attributes("disabled")).toBe("false"); // With expect(textarea.attributes("disabled")).toBeFalsy();This change makes the assertions more idiomatic and less prone to potential string representation changes.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game.class.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-107: Overall changes look good:feedbackproperty successfully integrated intoGameclass tests.The modifications consistently add the
feedbackproperty to both the "create" and "toJSON" test cases for theGameclass. These changes are well-integrated, following existing patterns and conventions in the file. The additions appear to be part of a larger feature implementation for game feedback, and they enhance the test coverage for this new aspect of theGameclass.Consider adding specific test cases for the
feedbackproperty to ensure its correct handling in various scenarios, such as games with and without feedback.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts (3)
14-30: LGTM: Well-structured test setup with a minor suggestion.The test setup is well-organized, with default props and a helper function for mounting the component. This approach promotes code reuse and makes it easy to customize test scenarios.
Consider adding a type annotation for the
wrappervariable on line 22 to improve code readability:let wrapper: ReturnType<typeof mount<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterContent>>;
41-57: LGTM: Comprehensive tests for Rating component with a suggestion.The tests for the Rating component cover both the initial prop passing and the update mechanism, which is great. They ensure that the component behaves correctly in terms of data flow.
Consider adding a test case to verify the behavior when an invalid score is provided (e.g., out of range). This would enhance the robustness of your test suite. For example:
it("should not update score when an invalid value is provided", async () => { const rating = wrapper.findComponent<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterRating>("#game-feedback-submitter-rating"); const invalidScore = 6; // Assuming valid scores are 1-5 (rating.vm as VueVm).$emit("update:modelValue", invalidScore); await nextTick(); expect((wrapper.vm as unknown as { createGameFeedbackDto: Ref<CreateGameFeedbackDto> }).createGameFeedbackDto.value.score).not.toBe(invalidScore); });
59-75: LGTM: Well-structured tests for Review component with a suggestion.The tests for the Review component are well-implemented and mirror the structure of the Rating tests, which is great for consistency. They cover both the initial prop passing and the update mechanism.
Consider adding a test case to verify the behavior when an empty review is provided. This would help ensure that the component handles edge cases correctly. For example:
it("should allow empty reviews", async () => { const review = wrapper.findComponent<typeof GameFeedbackSubmitterReview>("#game-feedback-submitter-review"); const emptyReview = ""; (review.vm as VueVm).$emit("update:modelValue", emptyReview); await nextTick(); expect((wrapper.vm as unknown as { createGameFeedbackDto: Ref<CreateGameFeedbackDto> }).createGameFeedbackDto.value.review).toBe(emptyReview); });tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.nuxt.spec.ts (2)
22-27: LGTM: Enhanced flexibility in component mountingThe updated
mountGameOverActionsComponentfunction now allows for more flexible testing scenarios by accepting custom mounting options. The integration ofcreateTestingPiniaensures consistent Pinia store setup across tests.Consider adding a default value for the
pluginsoption to make it easier to override in specific tests:return mountSuspendedComponent(GameOverActions, { plugins: [createTestingPinia(testingPinia)], ...options, plugins: [...(options.plugins || []), createTestingPinia(testingPinia)], });This change would allow tests to add additional plugins without overwriting the Pinia setup.
88-92: LGTM: Added test for game feedback submitter buttonThe new test case for the game feedback submitter button improves the component's test coverage and ensures the new functionality is working as expected.
Consider adding an additional assertion to verify the event payload, if any:
expect(wrapper.emitted("gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick")).toBeTruthy(); expect(wrapper.emitted("gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick")?.[0]).toEqual([/* expected payload */]);This would provide a more comprehensive test of the event emission.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.spec.ts (1)
90-105: LGTM: Well-structured test suite with good coverage.The test suite for
createGameFeedbackis well-implemented, covering both successful and error scenarios. It follows good testing practices such as using fake data and proper assertions.Minor suggestions for improvement:
- In the error case, consider using a more specific error (e.g.,
new Error("API Error")) instead of a generic one. This can help in identifying the nature of the error in the test output.- Consider adding a test case for invalid input, such as an empty
gameId, to ensure proper error handling for such scenarios.Example for suggestion 1:
vi.spyOn(mocks.composables.useWerewolvesAssistantApi, "fetchWerewolvesAssistantApi").mockRejectedValue(new Error("API Error"));tests/unit/specs/stores/game/useGameStore.spec.ts (1)
166-185: LGTM: Comprehensive tests added for createGameFeedback.The new describe block for
createGameFeedbackis well-structured and follows the existing testing patterns. The two tests effectively cover:
- Correct invocation of the mock function with expected parameters.
- Proper updating of the game state after feedback creation.
These tests ensure the basic functionality of the new feature.
Consider adding a test to verify the behavior when the API call fails (e.g., network error or server error). This would ensure proper error handling in the store method.
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
192-201: LGTM: New test suite added for Game Feedback Submitter.The addition of this test suite for the Game Feedback Submitter feature is a good step towards ensuring the new functionality is properly tested. The test structure is consistent with other tests in the file, and it covers the basic functionality of emitting the correct event.
Consider adding more test cases to this suite to cover different scenarios or edge cases related to the feedback submission feature. For example, you might want to test:
- The state of the feedback submitter before and after the button click.
- Any validation or error handling related to feedback submission.
- Interaction with other components or stores during the feedback submission process.
Would you like me to suggest some additional test cases for the Game Feedback Submitter feature?
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.vue (2)
29-35: Align button sizes for a consistent user interfaceThe "Submit Feedback" button is set to
size="large", while the "Close" button issize="small". This size discrepancy may affect the visual balance of the footer.Consider using the same button size for both actions to enhance the aesthetic consistency.
Apply this diff to adjust the "Close" button size:
<PrimeVueButton id="game-feedback-submitter-footer-close-button" :disabled="isSubmitButtonLoading" :label="$t('shared.actions.close')" severity="secondary" - size="small" + size="large" @click="closeDialog" />
9-9: Review the necessity of the hidden spacer<div>The
<div class="hidden md:block md:w-1/12"/>element is hidden on all screen sizes except medium and larger. If it's intended for layout spacing, ensure it's necessary for the design.If this element doesn't affect the layout significantly, consider removing it to simplify the template.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.vue (4)
77-79: Consider resettingcreateGameFeedbackDtowhen closing the dialog to clear any unsaved data.Currently, the
close()function only setsisVisibletofalse. ResettingcreateGameFeedbackDtoupon closing ensures that any unsaved feedback data is cleared when the dialog is closed, providing a clean state when the dialog is reopened.Apply this diff to implement the change:
function close(): void { isVisible.value = false; + resetCreateGameFeedbackDto(); }
59-62: Redundant use ofas constwithReadonly<CreateGameFeedbackDto>.Since
defaultCreateGameFeedbackDtois already typed asReadonly<CreateGameFeedbackDto>, theas constassertion is unnecessary and can be removed for cleaner code.Apply this diff to remove the redundant
as const:const defaultCreateGameFeedbackDto: Readonly<CreateGameFeedbackDto> = { score: 0, hasEncounteredError: false, -} as const; +};
66-66: Remove unnecessary explicit type annotation for the computed property.The type of
canDialogBeDismissedcan be inferred by TypeScript, so the explicit<boolean>type annotation is unnecessary. Removing it simplifies the code.Apply this diff to remove the redundant type annotation:
-const canDialogBeDismissed = computed<boolean>(() => creatingGameFeedbackStatus.value !== "pending"); +const canDialogBeDismissed = computed(() => creatingGameFeedbackStatus.value !== "pending");
45-45: Add a component name for better debugging and devtools support.Naming the component can aid in debugging and provide better visibility in Vue Devtools.
Apply this diff to add a component name:
<script setup lang="ts"> + defineOptions({ + name: 'GameFeedbackSubmitter', + });app/pages/game/[id].vue (1)
88-93: Consider renamingonClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonfor clarityThe function name
onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonis quite verbose. Consider renaming it toonGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickorhandleGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickfor better readability and consistency with naming conventions.tests/unit/specs/pages/game/game-page.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
27-27: Specify generic types forMockThe
Mocktype fromvitestis a generic type and can be parameterized to improve type safety.Consider specifying the generic types for
Mock:showGameFeedbackSubmitter: Mock, +// Specify the arguments and return type if known +// For example: +// showGameFeedbackSubmitter: Mock<[], void>,tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
135-136: Use localization utilities for translated text in assertionsThe expected title "Game feedback" might change based on localization. To make the test resilient to localization changes, consider using localization utilities to obtain the translated text.
Example:
- expect(dialogHeader.props("title")).toBe("Game feedback"); + const { t } = useI18n(); + expect(dialogHeader.props("title")).toBe(t("game.feedback.title"));tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts (2)
48-59: Maintain Snapshot IntegritySnapshot tests are valuable for detecting unexpected changes. Ensure that the snapshots are reviewed and committed intentionally. Regularly update them when intentional changes are made to the component's output.
126-131: Event Emission Should Be Explicitly AssertedWhile you check that
closeDialogis emitted, consider asserting the number of times it's emitted and any payloads to ensure the event emission is as expected.Update your assertion:
expect(wrapper.emitted("closeDialog")).toHaveLength(1);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (8)
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/__snapshots__/GameCanceled.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitter.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/__snapshots__/GameOverActions.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (55)
- app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.vue (2 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/game-canceled.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/game-feedback-submitter-button.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/game-feedback-submitter-rating.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/game-feedback-submitter-review.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/game-feedback-submitter-content.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/game-feedback-submitter-footer.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/game-feedback-submitter.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.vue (4 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.vue (2 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/game-over-actions.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameOver/game-over.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GamePlaying/GameEventsMonitor/GameEventsMonitorCurrentEvent/game-events-monitor-current-event.types.ts (1 hunks)
- app/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- app/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.ts (1 hunks)
- app/composables/api/game/types/game.class.ts (2 hunks)
- app/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.ts (3 hunks)
- app/pages/game/[id].vue (4 hunks)
- app/plugins/vue-font-awesome-icon/vue-font-awesome-icon.ts (4 hunks)
- app/stores/game/game-event/useGameEventsStore.ts (1 hunks)
- app/stores/game/useGameStore.ts (4 hunks)
- modules/i18n/locales/en.json (1 hunks)
- modules/i18n/locales/fr.json (3 hunks)
- nuxt.config.ts (1 hunks)
- package.json (0 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.nuxt.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.nuxt.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.nuxt.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.class.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game.class.spec.ts (7 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/pages/game/game-page.nuxt.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/stores/game/game-event/useGameEventsStore.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/stores/game/useGameStore.spec.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.factory.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.factory.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.factory.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game.factory.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.factory.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- package.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- app/components/pages/game/GamePlaying/GameEventsMonitor/GameEventsMonitorCurrentEvent/game-events-monitor-current-event.types.ts
- app/stores/game/game-event/useGameEventsStore.ts
- tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.class.spec.ts
- tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.factory.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Unit Tests 🧪
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts
[failure] 38-38: tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts > Game Feedback Submitter Content Component > should match snapshot when rendered.
Error: SnapshotGame Feedback Submitter Content Component > should match snapshot when rendered. 1mismatched
- Expected
Received
"
<game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub modelvalue="true" id="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error" class="w-auto"></game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub>
<game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub modelvalue="false" id="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error" class="w-auto"></game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub> </div> <divider-stub></divider-stub> <game-feedback-submitter-review-stub modelvalue="This game is awesome!" id="game-feedback-submitter-review"></game-feedback-submitter-review-stub>❯ tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts:38:28
🔇 Additional comments (122)
app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/game-canceled.types.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.The
GameCanceledEmitstype is correctly defined and exported. It follows TypeScript best practices and Vue.js naming conventions. The event name is descriptive and follows camelCase convention.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/game-feedback-submitter-review.types.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Type definition and export look good.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterReviewPropstype is well-structured and correctly exported. The use of an optional property allows for flexibility in component usage.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/game-feedback-submitter.types.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Clear and concise type definition.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterExposedtype is well-defined and follows TypeScript best practices. The naming is clear and descriptive, and theshowGameFeedbackSubmittermethod is appropriately typed as a function that takes no parameters and returns void.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/game-feedback-submitter-button.types.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM: Well-defined type for button click eventThe
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtonEmitstype is correctly defined to represent an event emitter for the game feedback submitter button. The empty array[]as the type forgameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickproperly indicates that this event doesn't pass any parameters when emitted.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error.types.ts (2)
5-7: LGTM! Export statement is correct.The export statement correctly uses the
export typesyntax, allowing the type to be imported and used in other files. This promotes modularity and reusability of the type definition.
1-7: Overall, the type definition and its export look good.The file is well-structured, concise, and follows TypeScript best practices. The type definition is clear and its export allows for proper modular usage. The only suggestion is to consider adding JSDoc for improved documentation.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/game-feedback-submitter-content.types.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and follows best practices.The import statement correctly imports the
CreateGameFeedbackDtotype using a relative path. The naming convention follows the TypeScript best practice of using PascalCase for types.
7-9: LGTM: Export statement is correct and follows best practices.The export statement correctly exports the
GameFeedbackSubmitterContentPropstype. Using a named export is a good practice as it allows for better tree-shaking and more explicit imports in other parts of the application.app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/game-feedback-submitter-footer.types.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is well-structured.The import statement correctly uses the
typekeyword for a type-only import, which is a best practice in TypeScript. This ensures that the import is removed during compilation, potentially reducing bundle size.
3-5: LGTM:GameFeedbackSubmitterFooterPropstype is well-defined.The type definition is clear, concise, and follows TypeScript best practices. Using the imported
CreateGameFeedbackDtotype ensures consistency across the application.
11-14: LGTM: Export statement is well-structured.The export statement correctly uses the
typekeyword for type-only exports, which is a best practice in TypeScript. This ensures that the exports are removed during compilation, potentially reducing bundle size.
1-14: Overall: Well-structured type definitions for GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.This file provides clear and concise type definitions for the GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter component. It follows TypeScript and Vue 3 best practices, ensuring type safety and consistency in the application. The use of type-only imports and exports is commendable, as it can lead to more efficient bundling.
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.factory.ts (3)
8-8: LGTM: New mock function for game feedback added.The addition of
createGameFeedback: Mock;to theMockedUseFetchGamestype is consistent with the existing structure and suggests the introduction of a new API function for creating game feedback in the main codebase.
17-17: LGTM: Factory function updated to include new mock.The addition of
createGameFeedback: vi.fn(),to thecreateFakeUseFetchGamesfunction is consistent with the type definition update and maintains the pattern established for other mock functions.
8-8: Verify test coverage for the new game feedback feature.The additions to both the
MockedUseFetchGamestype and thecreateFakeUseFetchGamesfunction are consistent and well-integrated. To ensure comprehensive test coverage:
- Update existing tests using this factory to include scenarios for the new
createGameFeedbackfunction.- Verify if similar updates are needed in other related test files to maintain consistency across the test suite.
Run the following script to check for other files that might need similar updates:
Also applies to: 17-17
✅ Verification successful
---
Test coverage for the new game feedback feature is verified.
All relevant test files have been identified and updated to include the
createGameFeedbackfunction. No additional updates are required.
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.factory.tstests/unit/specs/stores/game/useGameStore.spec.ts🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find other test files that might need updating for the new game feedback feature. # Test: Search for files with similar patterns to this factory rg --type typescript -l 'Mock.*UseFetchGames|createFakeUseFetchGames' tests/Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find other test files that might need updating for the new game feedback feature. # Test: Search for TypeScript test files with patterns related to UseFetchGames rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -l 'Mock.*UseFetchGames|createFakeUseFetchGames' tests/Length of output: 328
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the identified test files use `createGameFeedback` and need updates. # Files identified from the previous search files=( "tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.factory.ts" "tests/unit/specs/stores/game/useGameStore.spec.ts" "tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game-lobby/GameLobbyFooter/GameLobbyStartGameButton/GameLobbyStartGameButton.nuxt.spec.ts" ) # Search for `createGameFeedback` in each file for file in "${files[@]}"; do echo "Checking $file for 'createGameFeedback'..." rg 'createGameFeedback' "$file" doneLength of output: 2036
app/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports from 'class-transformer' and the local constants file are relevant to the class functionality. Using a constant for plain-to-instance options promotes consistency across the application.
5-18: LGTM: Class structure is well-defined and follows best practices.The
CreateGameFeedbackDtoclass is structured cleanly with clear property definitions and appropriate use of the@Expose()decorator. This ensures proper serialization and deserialization of the DTO.tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.factory.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are suitable for the file's purpose. The use of
fakerfor generating mock data and the import ofCreateGameFeedbackDtoare both appropriate.
13-13: LGTM: Proper export statement.The named export of the function is correct and follows best practices. This approach enhances maintainability and allows for easy import of specific functions in other parts of the codebase.
1-13: Overall: Well-implemented factory function for test data generation.This file introduces a well-structured factory function for creating mock
CreateGameFeedbackDtoobjects. It effectively uses thefakerlibrary to generate random data, allowing for diverse test scenarios. The function is flexible, allowing partial overrides of generated data.The only minor suggestion is to consider providing a default value for the
reviewproperty to ensure all properties have mock data when not explicitly provided.Great job on implementing this utility function for testing!
tests/unit/utils/factories/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.factory.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Correct import for faker library.The import of
fakerfrom "@faker-js/faker" is appropriate for generating mock data in this test utility.
5-5: LGTM: Well-defined function signature.The function signature is clear and appropriate for a factory function. The use of
Partial<GameFeedback>as the parameter type allows for flexible input, which is beneficial in testing scenarios.
16-16: LGTM: Appropriate export statement.The named export of the
createFakeGameFeedbackfunction is correct and follows best practices for module exports.
1-16: Overall: Well-implemented test utility for creating fake game feedback.This file introduces a robust factory function for creating fake
GameFeedbackinstances, which will be valuable for testing purposes. The implementation is clean, flexible, and follows good practices for test utilities.Minor suggestions were made regarding:
- Using an absolute import path for better maintainability.
- Providing a default value for the 'review' field.
These suggestions are optional and do not impact the overall functionality of the code.
app/composables/api/game/types/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports are relevant to the class implementation, utilizing the
class-transformerlibrary and local constants. This approach promotes code reusability and maintainability.
29-29: LGTM: Export statement is correct and follows best practices.The named export of the
GameFeedbackclass is appropriate and aligns with TypeScript best practices. This approach allows for clear and explicit imports in other parts of the application.
1-29: Overall, theGameFeedbackclass is well-implemented with room for minor improvements.The class structure is sound, with appropriate use of decorators and a static creation method. The suggested improvements focus on:
- Clarifying the naming convention for the
_idproperty.- Enhancing the type safety and flexibility of the
createmethod.These changes would further improve the code's clarity and robustness. Great job on implementing this new feature!
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.spec.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and follow good testing practices.The import statements are well-structured:
- Importing a factory function for creating fake DTOs, which is a good practice for testing.
- Importing the actual DTO class that is being tested.
This setup provides a clean separation between test utilities and the code under test.
4-5: LGTM: Well-structured test suite.The test suite structure is clear and follows best practices:
- Outer
describeblock defines the entity being tested (CreateGameFeedbackDto).- Inner
describeblock specifies the method being tested (create).This structure allows for easy expansion if more methods need to be tested in the future.
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game-feedback/game-feedback.class.spec.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for the test file.The import statements are well-structured, importing the necessary factory function for creating test data and the class under test. This approach promotes clean and maintainable test code.
4-5: LGTM: Well-structured test suite.The test suite is organized using nested
describeblocks, which provides clear context and improves readability. This structure allows for easy expansion of tests for other methods of theGameFeedbackclass in the future.
1-28: Consider adding tests for other methods of the GameFeedback class.The current test file provides good coverage for the
createmethod of theGameFeedbackclass. However, to ensure comprehensive test coverage, it's important to include tests for all public methods of the class.To identify other methods that might need testing, let's examine the
GameFeedbackclass implementation:Based on the results of this search, we can determine if there are other methods that require test coverage.
app/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.vue (4)
25-29: LGTM: New feedback button integrated wellThe
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtonis well-integrated into the existing layout. It follows the same styling and responsive design patterns as the other buttons, maintaining consistency in the UI.
39-40: LGTM: Imports added correctlyThe new imports for
GameCanceledEmitstype andGameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent are correctly added and follow the existing import style.
44-45: LGTM: Emits defined correctly using TypeScriptThe
defineEmitsfunction is correctly used with theGameCanceledEmitstype, following Vue 3 Composition API best practices for typed emits.
50-52: LGTM: Event handler function implemented correctlyThe
onClickFromGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonfunction is well-implemented. It correctly emits thegameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClickevent and uses proper TypeScript typing.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameCanceled/GameCanceled.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM: New imports are correctly added.The new imports for
VueVmtype andGameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent are correctly typed and follow the project's import style. These imports are necessary for the new test block.Also applies to: 8-8
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue (1)
1-53: Great job on implementing the GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError component!The component is well-structured, follows Vue 3 best practices, and effectively uses the Composition API with TypeScript. The use of internationalization and Pinia for state management is commendable. The template and script sections work together cohesively to provide a clear and functional user interface for submitting feedback about encountered errors.
Minor suggestions for improvement include:
- Enhancing accessibility by adding ARIA attributes to the toggle button.
- Considering memoization of computed properties for potential performance optimization in high-frequency rendering scenarios.
Overall, this is a solid implementation that adheres to modern Vue.js development standards.
app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.vue (2)
35-35: LGTM! Import statement is correct.The import statement for the
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtoncomponent is correctly added and follows the project's import conventions.
Line range hint
1-60: Overall, excellent implementation of the game feedback submitter feature.The changes in this file successfully introduce the game feedback submitter feature while maintaining code quality and consistency. The new component is well-integrated, and the event handling is properly implemented. The minor suggestions provided are for further enhancing consistency and user experience.
Great job on this implementation!
app/composables/api/game/types/game.class.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import path update forGameEventThe updated import path for
GameEventreflects a change in the directory structure, which is likely part of a larger refactoring effort to better organize types. This change improves the overall structure of the project.
5-5: LGTM: New import forGameFeedbackThe new import for
GameFeedbackis correctly added and follows the established import pattern in the file. This import supports the newfeedbackproperty in theGameclass.
Line range hint
1-94: Summary: Game feedback feature well-integrated intoGameclassThe changes in this file successfully integrate the game feedback feature into the
Gameclass. The modifications include:
- Updated import path for
GameEvent, improving the project structure.- New import for
GameFeedback, supporting the new feature.- Addition of a
feedbackproperty to theGameclass, allowing for optional game feedback.These changes are well-implemented, consistent with the existing code structure, and align with the PR objectives. The new feature is properly integrated, maintaining the class's overall design and serialization approach.
app/plugins/vue-font-awesome-icon/vue-font-awesome-icon.ts (3)
10-10: LGTM: New icon import for feedback feature.The addition of
faBugicon is consistent with the PR objectives for implementing a feedback submission feature. It's correctly imported from the solid icons package.
97-97: LGTM: New icons added to the library.The newly imported icons
faBugandfaStarRegularare correctly added to the library. Their placement maintains the existing alphabetical order, which is good for readability and maintenance.Also applies to: 161-161
Line range hint
1-176: Overall assessment: Well-implemented icon additions for the feedback feature.The changes to this file are well-executed and align with the PR objectives. The new icons (
faBugandfaStarRegular) have been correctly imported and added to the library, enhancing the available icon set for the feedback submission feature. The code maintains good organization and follows existing patterns.app/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement for CreateGameFeedbackDtoThe import statement for
CreateGameFeedbackDtois correctly added and follows the existing import pattern in the file.
12-12: LGTM: Addition of createGameFeedback to UseFetchGames typeThe
createGameFeedbackmethod is correctly added to theUseFetchGamestype. Its signature and return type are consistent with other methods in the type, maintaining a uniform interface.
71-71: LGTM: Exposing createGameFeedback in useFetchGames return objectThe
createGameFeedbackfunction is correctly added to the object returned byuseFetchGames, making it available for use alongside other methods. This addition is consistent with the existing pattern in the file.
Line range hint
1-71: Overall assessment: Well-implemented feature additionThe changes to add the
createGameFeedbackfunctionality are well-implemented and consistent with the existing code structure. The new method is properly integrated into theUseFetchGamestype and theuseFetchGamesfunction. The implementation follows established patterns for error handling and API interaction.A minor suggestion was made to add error logging in the catch block, which could aid in debugging if issues arise in the future.
Great job on maintaining consistency and expanding the functionality of the
useFetchGamescomposable!app/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.vue (3)
17-18: LGTM: Event listeners updated correctlyThe new event listeners
@game-feedback-submitter-button-clickand@game-history-button-clickhave been added to theGameOverActionscomponent, replacing the previous@show-game-historyevent. This change aligns with the PR objectives and enhances the component's functionality by separating concerns for feedback submission and game history display.
28-28: LGTM: Type import added for improved type safetyThe addition of the
GameOverEmitstype import enhances type safety for the component's emitted events. This is a good practice in TypeScript and Vue.js, as it helps catch potential errors at compile-time and improves code maintainability.
41-41: LGTM: Emit definition added with proper typingThe
defineEmits<GameOverEmits>()statement correctly defines the component's emitted events using the imported type. This ensures type safety for event emissions and aligns with Vue 3 Composition API best practices.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton/GameFeedbackSubmitterButton.nuxt.spec.ts (7)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports cover all necessary testing utilities for a Vue component test using Pinia for state management.
6-11: Well-structured imports with good testing practices.The imports are well-organized and include necessary factory functions, helpers, and the component under test. The use of factory functions (
createFakeGameFeedbackandcreateFakeGame) is a great practice for creating consistent test data.
13-32: Excellent test setup with reusable mounting function.The test suite is well-structured with a clear setup:
- The
mountGameFeedbackSubmitterButtonComponenthelper function enhances code reusability and readability.- The
beforeEachhook ensures a clean state for each test by mounting the component and initializing the game store.- The use of
createTestingPiniawith initial state ensures isolated and consistent store state for each test.This setup follows testing best practices and will make the tests more maintainable.
34-37: LGTM: Snapshot test is properly implemented.The snapshot test correctly verifies both the component's existence and its rendered output. This will help catch unintended UI changes during development.
39-53: Well-structured visibility tests covering both scenarios.These tests effectively verify the button's visibility logic:
- The button is visible when the game has no feedback.
- The button is hidden when the game has feedback.
The second test correctly updates the game store and uses
nextTick()to ensure the component has updated before asserting. This demonstrates a good understanding of Vue's reactivity system.
61-67: LGTM: Click event test is well-implemented.This test effectively verifies that:
- The button can be clicked.
- The correct event (
gameFeedbackSubmitterButtonClick) is emitted upon clicking.This ensures that the component's interactivity is working as expected.
1-68: Excellent test coverage and structure for GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component.This test file demonstrates high-quality unit testing practices:
- Comprehensive setup with reusable mounting function and proper store initialization.
- Good use of factory functions for creating test data.
- Thorough coverage of component behavior, including rendering, visibility logic, label verification, and event emission.
- Clear and descriptive test cases that align well with component functionality.
The test suite provides a solid foundation for ensuring the reliability of the GameFeedbackSubmitterButton component. Great job on implementing these tests!
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts (2)
1-10: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are appropriate.The import statements and type definitions are well-structured and include all necessary dependencies for the test suite. They cover Vue Test Utils, custom helpers, component types, and the store, which are essential for comprehensive testing.
1-81: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive test suite.This test file for the GameFeedbackSubmitterReview component is well-organized and covers essential functionality. It includes proper setup, snapshot testing, label verification, and thorough textarea behavior testing. The use of Vue Test Utils and custom helpers demonstrates good testing practices.
While the current implementation is solid, the suggested minor improvements throughout the review can further enhance the test suite's robustness and readability. These include adding type annotations, using translation keys, and employing more idiomatic assertions for boolean attributes.
Great job on creating a comprehensive test suite for this component!
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/game.class.spec.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement forcreateFakeGameFeedbackadded correctly.The new import statement for
createFakeGameFeedbackis appropriately placed and follows the project's conventions for importing test utilities.
19-19: LGTM:feedbackproperty correctly integrated into the "create" test case.The
feedbackproperty has been consistently added to both the input and expected output of theGame.createmethod. The use ofcreateFakeGameFeedback()aligns well with the existing pattern for other game properties, maintaining the structure and readability of the test case.Also applies to: 33-33, 49-49
67-67: LGTM:feedbackproperty correctly integrated into the "toJSON" test case.The
feedbackproperty has been consistently added to both thegameobject and the expected JSON output. These changes maintain the structure and readability of the test case while ensuring consistency with the modifications made in the "create" test case.Also applies to: 81-81, 95-95
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts (3)
1-12: LGTM: Imports and type declarations are appropriate.The imports and type declarations are well-organized and include all necessary dependencies for testing a Vue component. This setup provides a solid foundation for the test suite.
1-76: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive test suite with minor improvements needed.This test file for the GameFeedbackSubmitterContent component is well-organized and covers the main functionality of both the Rating and Review subcomponents. The use of helper functions and consistent test structure contributes to the maintainability of the test suite.
Main action items:
- Address the snapshot mismatch issue (lines 32-39).
- Consider implementing the suggested additional test cases for edge cases in both Rating and Review components.
- Add the type annotation for the
wrappervariable as suggested.These improvements will further enhance the robustness and readability of your test suite.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Unit Tests 🧪
[failure] 38-38: tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts > Game Feedback Submitter Content Component > should match snapshot when rendered.
Error: SnapshotGame Feedback Submitter Content Component > should match snapshot when rendered. 1mismatched
- Expected
Received
"
<game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub modelvalue="true" id="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error" class="w-auto"></game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub>
<game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub modelvalue="false" id="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error" class="w-auto"></game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub> </div> <divider-stub></divider-stub> <game-feedback-submitter-review-stub modelvalue="This game is awesome!" id="game-feedback-submitter-review"></game-feedback-submitter-review-stub>❯ tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts:38:28
32-39:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate snapshot to reflect recent changes.
The snapshot test is failing due to a mismatch in the
modelvalueprop of thegame-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub. The expected value istrue, but the actual value isfalse.This mismatch could be due to recent changes in the component's default props or behavior. To resolve this:
- Review the changes made to the
GameFeedbackSubmitterContentcomponent to ensure the new behavior is correct.- If the new behavior is intended, update the snapshot by running the test suite with the snapshot update flag:
npm test -- -u
- If the new behavior is unintended, investigate why the
modelvalueprop is nowfalseinstead oftrue.After addressing this issue, please run the following command to ensure all tests pass:
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Unit Tests 🧪
[failure] 38-38: tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts > Game Feedback Submitter Content Component > should match snapshot when rendered.
Error: SnapshotGame Feedback Submitter Content Component > should match snapshot when rendered. 1mismatched
- Expected
Received
"
<game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub modelvalue="true" id="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error" class="w-auto"></game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub>
<game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub modelvalue="false" id="game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error" class="w-auto"></game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error-stub> </div> <divider-stub></divider-stub> <game-feedback-submitter-review-stub modelvalue="This game is awesome!" id="game-feedback-submitter-review"></game-feedback-submitter-review-stub>❯ tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts:38:28
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOverActions/GameOverActions.nuxt.spec.ts (3)
1-20: LGTM: Improved test setup and type safetyThe new imports and constants enhance the testing capabilities and improve consistency in the test setup. The use of
createTestingPiniaand typed imports contributes to better type safety and more robust tests.
Line range hint
1-94: LGTM: Comprehensive improvements to GameOverActions test suiteThe changes to this test file significantly enhance the structure, flexibility, and coverage of the GameOverActions component tests. Key improvements include:
- Better type safety with new imports and type annotations.
- More flexible component mounting with the updated
mountGameOverActionsComponentfunction.- Consistent Pinia store setup across tests using
createTestingPinia.- Updated event naming for better clarity.
- New test coverage for the game feedback submitter functionality.
These changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable test suite, which will help ensure the reliability of the GameOverActions component as the application evolves.
40-55: LGTM: Updated mounting method and event nameThe changes to use the updated
mountGameOverActionsComponentfunction in the test cases are consistent and improve the overall test structure.The event name change from "showGameHistory" to "gameHistoryButtonClick" is noted.
Please verify that this event name change has been propagated to all relevant parts of the application that listen for this event. Run the following script to check for any remaining occurrences of the old event name:
Also applies to: 85-86
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Event name successfully updated
All occurrences of the old event name "showGameHistory" have been successfully updated to "gameHistoryButtonClick".
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining occurrences of the old event name rg '"showGameHistory"' --type vue --type typescriptLength of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining occurrences of the old event name in .vue and .ts/.tsx files rg '"showGameHistory"' --glob '*.vue' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 68
tests/unit/specs/composables/api/game/useFetchGames.spec.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement is correctly placed and follows project conventions.The import of
createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDtois appropriately added and uses the@testsalias, which is good for maintaining consistent imports across the project.nuxt.config.ts (2)
159-162: LGTM! The added components align with the PR objective.The addition of "Rating" and "Textarea" components to the PrimeVue configuration is consistent with implementing a game feedback submitter feature. These components will likely be used for collecting numerical ratings and textual feedback respectively. The alphabetical ordering is maintained, which is good for readability and consistency.
Line range hint
1-280: Overall, the changes to nuxt.config.ts are minimal and focused.The additions to the PrimeVue configuration are the only changes in this file. They are well-aligned with the PR objective of implementing a game feedback submitter feature. The rest of the configuration remains unchanged, which helps maintain the stability of the existing setup.
tests/unit/specs/stores/game/useGameStore.spec.ts (4)
3-3: LGTM: New import for game feedback DTO factory.The import statement for
createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDtois correctly added and follows the existing import style. This factory function will be useful for creating test data in the newcreateGameFeedbacktests.
18-18: LGTM: Mock function added for createGameFeedback.The
createGameFeedbackmock function is correctly added to theuseFetchGamesmock object. This addition is consistent with the existing mock structure and will allow proper testing of the new feedback creation functionality.
39-44: LGTM: Improved test description clarity.The test description has been updated to be more specific about what initial state is being checked. This change improves the clarity of the test's purpose without altering its logic.
46-52: LGTM: Comprehensive initial status state test added.This new test is a valuable addition that improves the test coverage. It explicitly checks the initial states of all status properties, including the new
creatingGameFeedbackStatus. This ensures that all statuses start in the expected "idle" state.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameOver/GameOver.nuxt.spec.ts (3)
53-59: LGTM: Mock setup updated to reflect component changes.The changes to the mock setup, particularly the addition of
showGameHistory, align well with the updates to the component's event handling mentioned in the AI summary. This ensures that the tests accurately reflect the current component behavior.
178-178: LGTM: Event name updated for clarity.The change from
"show-game-history"to"game-history-button-click"improves the clarity of the event's purpose. This update is consistent with the changes mentioned in the AI summary and follows a more descriptive naming convention.
187-187: LGTM: Error handling test updated consistently.The event name in the error handling test has been correctly updated to
"game-history-button-click", maintaining consistency with the earlier change. This ensures that the error handling test remains valid and aligned with the component's current behavior.tests/unit/specs/stores/game/game-event/useGameEventsStore.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-290: LGTM! No further changes required.The change in the import path for the
GameEventtype doesn't affect the rest of the file. All tests and their assertions remain valid and should work as expected.
7-7: LGTM! Verify consistent usage across the codebase.The import path change for the
GameEventtype reflects an improvement in code organization. This change doesn't affect the functionality of the tests.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script to check for any remaining old import paths:
✅ Verification successful
Verified! Import paths for
GameEventhave been consistently updated across the codebase with no old paths remaining.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths for GameEvent # Test: Search for the old import path. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript 'from "~/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.class"' # Test: Search for the new import path. Expect: Multiple results including this file. rg --type typescript 'from "~/composables/api/game/types/game-event/game-event.class"'Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths for GameEvent # Test: Search for the old import path using correct file type identifiers. Expect: No results. rg --type ts 'from "~/composables/api/game/game-event/game-event.class"' # Test: Search for the new import path using correct file type identifiers. Expect: Multiple results including this file. rg --type ts 'from "~/composables/api/game/types/game-event/game-event.class"'Length of output: 1131
modules/i18n/locales/en.json (7)
1651-1653: LGTM: Clear and concise feedback button text.The new
GameFeedbackSubmitterButtonsection is well-implemented with a clear and concise text for the feedback button.
1654-1656: LGTM: Appropriate feedback modal title.The
GameFeedbackSubmittersection provides a suitable title for the feedback modal.
1657-1661: LGTM: Well-structured feedback submission flow.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterFootersection provides clear and appropriate texts for the feedback submission process, including submit button, confirmation, and thank you message.
1662-1670: LGTM: Comprehensive rating options and clear instructions.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterRatingsection provides a well-structured set of rating options with clear instructions for the user.
1671-1674: LGTM: Clear and encouraging review prompt.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterReviewsection effectively encourages users to provide a review while clearly stating its optional nature. The explanation of how it helps improve the assistant is a nice touch.
1675-1678: LGTM: Clear error reporting options.The
GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredErrorsection provides clear options for users to report on the game's stability or any errors encountered. This is valuable for improving the assistant's performance.
1651-1678: LGTM: Well-implemented game feedback feature localization.The new additions to the localization file for the game feedback feature are comprehensive and well-structured. They cover all aspects of the feedback process, including:
- A feedback button
- A modal title
- Submission flow texts
- Rating options
- Review prompts
- Error reporting
The text is clear, user-friendly, and encourages user participation while being respectful of their time. This implementation should provide a smooth experience for users giving feedback on their games.
modules/i18n/locales/fr.json (10)
1651-1653: LGTM: New GameFeedbackSubmitterButton section added correctlyThe new section for the GameFeedbackSubmitterButton is properly added and follows the existing structure and naming conventions.
1654-1656: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitter section added correctlyThe GameFeedbackSubmitter section is correctly added and maintains consistency with other sections.
1657-1661: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter section is well-structuredThe GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter section is properly added with appropriate translations for submit, submitted, and thank you messages.
1662-1670: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterRating section is comprehensiveThe GameFeedbackSubmitterRating section includes all necessary translations for rating options and instructions. The structure is consistent with other sections.
1671-1674: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterReview section added correctlyThe GameFeedbackSubmitterReview section is properly structured and includes appropriate translations for the review prompt and optional nature of the feedback.
1675-1679: LGTM: GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError section is well-formedThe GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError section is correctly added and includes translations for error-related questions and responses.
Line range hint
1517-1524: LGTM: GamePlaygroundFooterCountdown section updated correctlyThe GamePlaygroundFooterCountdown section has been updated with new translations for remaining time and time-over messages. The structure and naming conventions are consistent with the rest of the file.
1643-1648: LGTM: GameLobbyGroupOrganizerGroupNameInput section added correctlyThe GameLobbyGroupOrganizerGroupNameInput section has been properly added with translations for submitting, editing, and naming groups. The structure is consistent with other sections.
1649-1651: LGTM: GameTeamSidePlayerGroup section added correctlyThe GameTeamSidePlayerGroup section has been added with a translation for displaying a player's group. The structure is consistent with other sections.
Line range hint
1-1679: Overall LGTM: File structure and content are well-maintainedThe entire file has been reviewed, and all additions and modifications are consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. The new sections for game feedback and group organization have been seamlessly integrated, and the translations appear to be appropriate and complete.
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.vue (2)
17-17: Verify the event used for dialog visibility update.Using
@update:visible="close"relies on thePrimeVueDialogemitting theupdate:visibleevent. Ensure that this event is correctly emitted to avoid unexpected behavior.If the event is different, consider adjusting it accordingly. For example, if
PrimeVueDialogemits ahideevent upon closing, you might use:- @update:visible="close" + @hide="close"
28-42: Confirm that child components are properly imported and registered.Ensure that
GameFeedbackSubmitterContentandGameFeedbackSubmitterFooterare correctly imported and that their props and events align with their usage in this component.This helps prevent runtime errors due to mismatches in component interfaces.
app/pages/game/[id].vue (2)
Line range hint
78-83: LGTM: Correct usage ofcomputed<Component>The refactoring of
gameStatusComponentToRendertocomputed<Component>is appropriate and improves type safety.
35-35: Verify thatgame-feedback-submitter-button-clickevent is emitted by all game status componentsThe
@game-feedback-submitter-button-clickevent listener is added to the dynamic component rendered bygameStatusComponentToRender. Please verify that all possible components (GamePlaying,GameOver,GameCanceled) emit thegame-feedback-submitter-button-clickevent to ensure the listener functions as expected.Run the following script to verify the event emissions:
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.vue (1)
1-118: Well-implementedGameFeedbackSubmitterRatingcomponentThe component is well-structured and effectively uses the Composition API with TypeScript. The computed properties for
ratingOnIconColorandratingDescriptionAndSeverityare logically constructed, and the reactivescoremodel is appropriately managed. The integration with internationalization (useI18n) and state management (Piniastore) is also correctly handled.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitter.nuxt.spec.ts (5)
62-65: Consistent use of 'props' for component property assertionsAs mentioned earlier, use
dialog.props("closable")instead ofdialog.attributes("closable")when asserting theclosableprop.Apply this diff to fix the assertion:
- expect(dialog.attributes("closable")).toBe("false"); + expect(dialog.props("closable")).toBe(false);
74-77: Consistent use of 'props' and camelCase prop namesAs previously noted, use
dialog.props("closeOnEscape")instead ofdialog.attributes("close-on-escape")when asserting thecloseOnEscapeprop.Apply this diff to fix the assertion:
- expect(dialog.attributes("close-on-escape")).toBe("false"); + expect(dialog.props("closeOnEscape")).toBe(false);
92-95: Consistent prop access for 'dismissableMask'Use
dialog.props("dismissableMask")instead ofdialog.attributes("dismissable-mask")to assert thedismissableMaskprop value.Apply this diff to fix the assertion:
- expect(dialog.attributes("dismissable-mask")).toBe("false"); + expect(dialog.props("dismissableMask")).toBe(false);
139-146: Ensure proper cleanup after dialog interactionsAfter simulating the close button click, verify that other related states are reset or cleaned up to prevent test interference.
Review the store state and any event listeners to ensure they are properly reset.
110-111: Ensure the component is fully rendered before invoking methodsWhen calling
showGameFeedbackSubmitter(), ensure that the component is fully mounted and all asynchronous operations are completed.Run the following script to check if there are any pending asynchronous operations:
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts (7)
14-17: Unused Mock Function DetectedThe mock function
addSuccessToastis defined but not directly used in the tests. Ensure that this mock is necessary. If it's intended to verify toast notifications, make sure to include assertions for its usage.Check if
addSuccessToastis called within your tests. If it's not being used, consider removing it to clean up the test suite:- usePrimeVueToasts: { - addSuccessToast: vi.fn(), - }, + // Removed unused mock function addSuccessToast
19-21: Proper Mocking ofusePrimeVueToastsComposableGood job mocking the
usePrimeVueToastscomposable to simulate toast notifications. This ensures your tests remain isolated and do not depend on the actual implementation of the toast system.
24-29: Consistent Use of Test Data FactoriesUsing
createFakeCreateGameFeedbackDtoto generate default test data enhances test reliability and readability. It ensures that your tests are based on consistent and controlled data.
61-65: Verify Translation KeysThe test checks the label of the submit button as "Submit feedback". Ensure that this label is correctly translated using your localization system and that the key exists in your translation files.
Confirm that the translation key exists and is correctly mapped:
expect(submitButton.attributes("label")).toBe(t("components.GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.submitFeedback"));
108-114: Mock Store Actions for ClarityWhen testing the submission of feedback, ensure that the
createGameFeedbackaction in the store is properly mocked to prevent actual API calls during testing.Confirm that
createGameFeedbackis a mock function:const gameStore = useGameStore(); gameStore.createGameFeedback = vi.fn();This allows you to assert its invocation without side effects.
148-155: Consistent Testing for Disabled StateYou've tested the disabled state for the submit button when
creatingGameFeedbackStatusis"pending". Ensure similar logic applies to the close button for consistent user experience.
136-139: Verify Close Button TranslationSimilar to the submit button, ensure that the close button's label uses the correct translation key and that it exists in your localization files.
Check that the label is translated properly:
expect(closeButton.attributes("label")).toBe(t("common.close"));Ensure the key
common.closeexists in your translation resources.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
20-26: Helper Function Enhances Test MaintainabilityThe
mountGameFeedbackSubmitterRatingComponentfunction effectively encapsulates the component mounting logic, improving code reuse and test maintainability.app/stores/game/useGameStore.ts (4)
4-4: ImportingCreateGameFeedbackDtoThe import statement for
CreateGameFeedbackDtois correct and aligns with the project's import structure.
17-17: DestructuringcreateGameFeedbackfrom API hooksThe
createGameFeedbackFromApifunction is correctly destructured fromuseFetchGames, maintaining consistency with existing API functions.
28-28: InitializingcreatingGameFeedbackStatusThe status variable
creatingGameFeedbackStatusis properly initialized with a default value of"idle", consistent with other status variables in the store.
96-96: ExposingcreatingGameFeedbackStatusandcreateGameFeedbackAdding
creatingGameFeedbackStatusandcreateGameFeedbackto the returned object makes them accessible to components that utilize this store, which is appropriate and follows the existing pattern.Also applies to: 102-102
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/game-feedback-submitter.types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/composables/api/game/dto/create-game-feedback/create-game-feedback.dto.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.vue
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...eedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...eedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error.types.ts (1)
1-3: Consider improving property naming and adding documentation.While the type definition is functionally correct, consider the following improvements:
- The
modelValueproperty name is generic. A more descriptive name likehasEncounteredErrororisErrorEncounteredwould better convey its purpose.- Adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this type and its property would enhance code readability and maintainability.
Here's a suggested improvement:
/** * Props for the GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError component. * Used to indicate whether an error was encountered during feedback submission. */ type GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredErrorProps = { hasEncounteredError: boolean; };tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.nuxt.spec.ts (4)
31-34: LGTM: Snapshot test is implementedThe snapshot test is a good practice for catching unexpected changes in component rendering.
Consider adding another snapshot test with different prop values to ensure the component renders correctly with various inputs.
36-42: LGTM: Label translation test is implementedThe test for label translation is well-implemented and crucial for ensuring proper internationalization.
Consider parameterizing the expected translation string to make it easier to update if the translation changes in the future. For example:
const expectedTranslation = "Was everything all right during the game?"; expect(label.text()).toBe(expectedTranslation);
44-98: LGTM: Toggle Button tests are comprehensiveThe Toggle Button tests cover a wide range of functionality, including model value handling, disabled state, CSS classes, and label translation. The use of the game store for testing the disabled state is particularly good.
Consider adding a test for the "on" label of the Toggle Button to ensure complete coverage of the component's text elements.
100-133: LGTM: Icon tests are well-implementedThe icon tests effectively cover both states of the icon rendering based on the model value. The use of a custom mounting configuration to avoid stubbing the ToggleButton component is a good approach.
The
beforeEachblock in the "Icon" describe section (lines 101-110) might be unnecessary as it's overwritten in the second test. Consider removing it and moving the custom mounting configuration directly into each test for clarity.tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts (1)
45-49: Correct the duplicated word "create" in test descriptionsThe test descriptions in lines 45 and 78 have a duplicated word "create create". They should read:
- Line 45:
"should pass game feedback score to rating dto when rendered."- Line 78:
"should pass game feedback review to review dto when rendered."Also applies to: 78-82
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error.types.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts
- tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter/GameFeedbackSubmitterFooter.nuxt.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/game-feedback-submitter-encountered-error.types.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Type definition and export look good.The structure of the type definition and its export are correct and follow TypeScript best practices. The type is properly defined and exported, making it available for use in other parts of the application.
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.nuxt.spec.ts (2)
1-29: LGTM: Imports and setup are well-structuredThe imports, helper function, and default props are well-organized and provide a solid foundation for the test suite. This setup enhances code reusability and readability.
1-134: Overall: Excellent test coverage and structureThis test suite for the GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError component is well-structured, comprehensive, and follows good testing practices. It covers rendering, props, events, conditional rendering, and internationalization aspects of the component.
Key strengths:
- Good use of helper functions and default props for improved readability and maintainability.
- Comprehensive coverage of the Toggle Button functionality.
- Proper testing of internationalization.
- Effective use of the game store for testing component states.
The minor suggestions provided earlier can further enhance the already solid test suite. Great job on implementing thorough unit tests for this component!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.vue (1)
116-118: Improve null handling inonChangeFromRatingfunctionThe current implementation sets the score to 0 when the event value is null. Consider if this is the desired behavior or if it would be better to maintain the previous score or use a different default value.
You could improve the function like this:
function onChangeFromRating(event: { value: number | null }): void { score.value = event.value ?? score.value; // Keeps the previous score if the new value is null }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
tests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/specs/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/__snapshots__/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.nuxt.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.vue (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError/GameFeedbackSubmitterEncounteredError.vue
- app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview/GameFeedbackSubmitterReview.vue
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/components/pages/game/GameFeedbackSubmitter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.vue (3)
1-50: LGTM: Well-structured template with good use of componentsThe template structure is well-organized and makes good use of PrimeVue components. The transition effect for the rating description badge is a nice touch for improved user experience.
53-119: LGTM: Well-structured script using Composition API and TypeScriptThe script section makes good use of Vue 3 Composition API and TypeScript. The computed properties are well-structured and provide good reactivity. The overall organization of the code is clean and follows best practices.
64-64:⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing import for
useI18nThe
useI18nfunction is used but not imported, which will lead to a runtime error.Add the import statement at the top of your script section:
+import { useI18n } from 'vue-i18n';Likely invalid or redundant comment.
...ter/GameFeedbackSubmitterContent/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating/GameFeedbackSubmitterRating.vue
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
.run/Game Feedback.run.xml (3)
3-4: LGTM: File path and name filter options.The file path is correctly set to the acceptance tests directory. The empty name filter allows all tests in this directory to be considered, which is fine for a general "Game Feedback" configuration.
Consider adding a name filter if you want to target specific test files related to game feedback. This could help in running a more focused subset of tests.
5-5: LGTM: Cucumber.js arguments are well-configured.The Cucumber.js arguments are appropriately set:
- A configuration file is specified, ensuring consistent settings.
- The tag filter
@game-feedbackcorrectly targets game feedback-related tests.Consider increasing the parallel execution setting (currently set to 1) if your tests are designed to run concurrently. This could potentially speed up the test execution, especially as the number of tests grows. For example:
- <option name="cucumberJsArguments" value="--config config/cucumber/cucumber.json --parallel 1 --tags @game-feedback" /> + <option name="cucumberJsArguments" value="--config config/cucumber/cucumber.json --parallel 4 --tags @game-feedback" />Adjust the number based on your system's capabilities and the nature of your tests.
7-9: LGTM: Environment variable for TypeScript and ESM support.The NODE_OPTIONS environment variable is correctly set to enable TypeScript and ECMAScript modules support in Node.js. This is appropriate for modern JavaScript/TypeScript projects.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this environment variable setting. For example:
<envs> <!-- Enable TypeScript and ECMAScript modules support --> <env name="NODE_OPTIONS" value="--import tsx/esm" /> </envs>This can help other developers understand the configuration more easily.
tests/acceptance/features/playwright/helpers/inputs/playwright-inputs.when-steps-helpers.ts (2)
3-7: LGTM: Well-implemented helper function with a minor suggestion.The
fillInputWithLabelfunction is well-structured and follows Playwright's best practices. It properly waits for the element to be visible before interacting with it, which helps prevent flaky tests. TheisExactparameter provides good flexibility for label matching.Consider adding error handling to provide more informative error messages if the input is not found or if the fill operation fails. For example:
async function fillInputWithLabel(world: CustomWorld, label: string, text: string, isExact = false): Promise<void> { try { const input = world.page.getByLabel(label, { exact: isExact }); await input.waitFor({ state: "visible", timeout: 5000 }); await input.fill(text); } catch (error) { throw new Error(`Failed to fill input with label "${label}": ${error.message}`); } }This will provide more context in case of failures during test execution.
9-13: LGTM: Well-implemented helper function with a suggestion for consistency.The
fillInputWithLocatorfunction is well-structured and follows the same best practices asfillInputWithLabel. It provides a useful alternative for locating input elements when labels are not available or reliable.For consistency with the
fillInputWithLabelfunction, consider adding similar error handling:async function fillInputWithLocator(world: CustomWorld, locator: string, text: string): Promise<void> { try { const input = world.page.locator(locator); await input.waitFor({ state: "visible", timeout: 5000 }); await input.fill(text); } catch (error) { throw new Error(`Failed to fill input with locator "${locator}": ${error.message}`); } }This will ensure both functions have consistent error handling and provide informative error messages.
tests/acceptance/features/playwright/step-definitions/inputs/playwright-inputs.when-steps.ts (2)
12-12: LGTM: Good refactoring, consider destructuringThe use of a helper function simplifies the step definition and improves maintainability. Good job!
Consider destructuring
thisto pass only the necessary properties to the helper function. This can make the code more explicit about what parts of the context are being used. For example:const { page } = this; await fillInputWithLabel({ page }, label, text, isExact);This assumes that
pageis the only property used fromthisin the helper function. Adjust as necessary based on the actual implementation offillInputWithLabel.
16-16: LGTM: Consistent refactoringThe use of a helper function here is consistent with the previous step definition. This improves code consistency and maintainability.
As suggested for the previous step, consider destructuring
thisto pass only the necessary properties:const { page } = this; await fillInputWithLocator({ page }, locator, text);This assumes that
pageis the only property used fromthisin the helper function. Adjust based on the actual implementation offillInputWithLocator.tests/acceptance/features/game/step-definitions/game-feedback/game-feedback.when-steps.ts (3)
7-10: LGTM with suggestion: Consider simplifying the locator strategy.The step definition correctly handles setting the rating score. However, the locator strategy might be fragile due to its complexity.
Consider simplifying the locator strategy by adding data attributes to the SVG elements in the component. This would make the test more robust and easier to maintain. For example:
await this.page.locator(`[data-testid="rating-star-${ratingIndex}"]`).click();This assumes you add
data-testidattributes to your SVG elements in the component.
12-14: LGTM with suggestion: Clarify the purpose of this step.The step definition correctly uses the
clickOnLabelhelper function to interact with the error reporting element.Consider renaming the step to better reflect its purpose:
When(/^the user toggles the error encountered option in game feedback submitter$/u, async function(this: CustomWorld): Promise<void> { await clickOnLabel(this, "Was everything all right during the game?"); });This makes it clearer that the action is toggling an option rather than just setting it.
16-19: LGTM with suggestions: Consider improving robustness and clarity.The step definition correctly uses the
fillInputWithLabelhelper function to set the review text.
- Consider using a data attribute instead of the full label text to make the test more robust:
const inputSelector = '[data-testid="game-feedback-review"]'; await fillInputWithLabel(this, inputSelector, text, true);
- Extract the label text to a constant for better maintainability:
const REVIEW_LABEL = "This is optional but will help us a lot to improve the Werewolves Assistant"; await fillInputWithLabel(this, REVIEW_LABEL, text, true);
- Add a comment explaining the purpose of the
trueparameter:// The true parameter indicates this is a textarea rather than a simple input await fillInputWithLabel(this, label, text, true);These changes would improve the robustness and clarity of the test.
tests/acceptance/features/playwright/helpers/roles/playwright-roles.when-steps-helpers.ts (1)
17-21: LGTM! Consider adding a type annotation for consistency.The new
clickOnLabelfunction is well-implemented and follows the existing patterns in the file. It correctly uses Playwright's API and handles asynchronous operations.For consistency with the
clickOnRoleWithTextfunction, consider adding a return type annotation:-async function clickOnLabel(world: CustomWorld, label: string, isExact = false): Promise<void> { +async function clickOnLabel(world: CustomWorld, label: string, isExact = false): Promise<void> {This change would make the function signature more explicit and consistent with the other functions in the file.
tests/acceptance/features/game/features/misc/game-canceled.feature (1)
13-13: LGTM! Consider adding a scenario for feedback submission.The addition of this step enhances the test coverage by verifying the presence of the feedback button after game cancellation. It aligns well with the scenario's purpose and doesn't impact other tests.
To further improve test coverage, consider adding a new scenario that tests the actual submission of feedback after game cancellation. This would ensure that the entire feedback flow is properly tested.
tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-feedback/game-feedback.feature (1)
27-27: Consider improving the toast message grammarThe toast message "Thanks for your help to improve the Werewolves Assistant" appears in multiple places and can be grammatically improved for clarity.
Suggested change:
- Then the toast with text "Thanks for your help to improve the Werewolves Assistant" should be visible + Then the toast with text "Thanks for your help in improving the Werewolves Assistant" should be visibleAlso applies to: 55-55
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (21)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamltests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game canceled.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game feedback.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by Angel.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by Lovers and Cupid.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by Lovers.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by Pied Piper.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by Prejudiced Manipulator.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by Villagers.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by Werewolves.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by White Werewolf.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/darwin/Game won by nobody.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game canceled.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game won by Angel.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game won by Lovers.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game won by Pied Piper.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game won by Prejudiced Manipulator.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game won by Villagers.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game won by Werewolves.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game won by White Werewolf.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/acceptance/screenshots/linux/Game won by nobody.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- .run/Game Feedback.run.xml (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-feedback/game-feedback.feature (1 hunks)
- tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-over/game-victory/game-victory.feature (8 hunks)
- tests/acceptance/features/game/features/misc/game-canceled.feature (1 hunks)
- tests/acceptance/features/game/step-definitions/game-feedback/game-feedback.when-steps.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/acceptance/features/playwright/helpers/inputs/playwright-inputs.when-steps-helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/acceptance/features/playwright/helpers/roles/playwright-roles.when-steps-helpers.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/acceptance/features/playwright/step-definitions/inputs/playwright-inputs.when-steps.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (22)
.run/Game Feedback.run.xml (4)
1-2: LGTM: Component and configuration declaration.The component and configuration declaration are correctly structured for a Cucumber.js run configuration in JetBrains IDEs. The configuration is appropriately named "Game Feedback" and categorized under the "Tags" folder.
6-6: LGTM: Working directory is correctly set.The working directory is appropriately set to the project root (
$PROJECT_DIR$). This ensures that relative paths in tests and configuration files are resolved correctly.
10-10: LGTM: Method version is up-to-date.The method version is correctly set to 2, which is appropriate for current JetBrains IDEs configuration formats.
1-12: Overall, the Game Feedback run configuration is well-structured and appropriate.This configuration file sets up a solid foundation for running game feedback-related Cucumber.js tests. It correctly specifies the test directory, uses appropriate tags for filtering, and sets up the necessary environment for TypeScript and ESM support.
The minor suggestions provided (considering a name filter, adjusting parallel execution, and adding a comment for the environment variable) are optional improvements that could enhance the configuration's efficiency and clarity.
Great job on setting up this run configuration!
tests/acceptance/features/playwright/helpers/inputs/playwright-inputs.when-steps-helpers.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of
CustomWorldtype is properly done and follows TypeScript best practices.
15-18: LGTM: Export statement is correct.The export statement properly exposes both helper functions, allowing them to be imported and used in other test files. This follows TypeScript best practices for module exports.
1-18: Overall, excellent addition to the test helpers.This file introduces two well-implemented helper functions for Playwright tests. They follow best practices, are properly typed, and will likely improve the readability and maintainability of the test suite. The minor suggestions for error handling, if implemented, will further enhance the robustness of these helpers.
Great job on this addition!
tests/acceptance/features/playwright/step-definitions/inputs/playwright-inputs.when-steps.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Good separation of concernsThe import of helper functions from a separate file is a good practice. It improves code organization and maintainability.
Line range hint
1-17: Overall: Good refactoring, verify helper functionsThe changes in this file consistently improve code organization by moving implementation details to helper functions. This is a good practice that enhances maintainability and readability of the step definitions.
To ensure the correctness of the refactoring, let's verify the implementation of the new helper functions:
This script will help us confirm that the helper functions are correctly implemented and contain the logic that was previously in the step definitions.
tests/acceptance/features/game/step-definitions/game-feedback/game-feedback.when-steps.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and appropriate.The import statements are logically grouped and use absolute imports consistently. They provide all the necessary functions and types for the implemented step definitions.
1-19: Overall: Well-implemented step definitions with room for minor improvements.The file successfully implements the necessary step definitions for game feedback submission in acceptance tests. The code is generally well-structured and uses appropriate helper functions.
To further improve the code:
- Consider using data attributes for more robust element selection.
- Clarify step definition names and add comments where necessary.
- Extract long strings to constants for better maintainability.
These changes would enhance the robustness and readability of the acceptance tests.
tests/acceptance/features/playwright/helpers/roles/playwright-roles.when-steps-helpers.ts (2)
31-31: LGTM! Export statement updated correctly.The
clickOnLabelfunction has been properly added to the export statement, making it available for use in other files. This change is consistent with the existing code structure and follows best practices for module exports.
Line range hint
17-31: Overall, the changes look good and enhance the test helper functionality.The addition of the
clickOnLabelfunction provides a useful method for interacting with labeled inputs in Playwright tests. The implementation is consistent with existing patterns in the file and follows best practices. The function is correctly exported, making it available for use in other test files.These changes improve the flexibility of the test helpers without introducing any breaking changes or unintended side effects to the existing code.
tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-over/game-victory/game-victory.feature (9)
44-44: LGTM: Feedback button added correctly for 'Game won by nobody' scenario.The new step to check for the "Give feedback on this game" button visibility is correctly placed and consistent with the expected changes.
71-71: LGTM: Feedback button added correctly for 'Game won by Villagers' scenario.The new step to check for the "Give feedback on this game" button visibility is correctly placed and consistent with the expected changes.
104-104: LGTM: Feedback button added correctly for 'Game won by Werewolves' scenario.The new step to check for the "Give feedback on this game" button visibility is correctly placed and consistent with the expected changes.
143-143: LGTM: Feedback button added correctly for 'Game won by Lovers' scenario.The new step to check for the "Give feedback on this game" button visibility is correctly placed and consistent with the expected changes.
168-168: LGTM: Feedback button added correctly for 'Game won by Angel' scenario.The new step to check for the "Give feedback on this game" button visibility is correctly placed and consistent with the expected changes.
202-202: LGTM: Feedback button added correctly for 'Game won by Pied Piper' scenario.The new step to check for the "Give feedback on this game" button visibility is correctly placed and consistent with the expected changes.
233-233: LGTM: Feedback button added correctly for 'Game won by White Werewolf' scenario.The new step to check for the "Give feedback on this game" button visibility is correctly placed and consistent with the expected changes.
267-267: LGTM: Feedback button added correctly for 'Game won by Prejudiced Manipulator' scenario.The new step to check for the "Give feedback on this game" button visibility is correctly placed and consistent with the expected changes.
Line range hint
1-269: Overall: Excellent implementation of feedback button visibility checks across all game victory scenarios.The changes in this file consistently add a new step to check for the visibility of the "Give feedback on this game" button across all game victory scenarios. This enhancement improves the test coverage for the new feedback feature and ensures it's properly displayed in all possible game-over states.
Key points:
- The new step is consistently placed after checking for the "Create another game" button visibility.
- All scenarios (8 in total) have been updated, covering various game victory conditions.
- The changes align perfectly with the AI-generated summary of the pull request.
These updates will help ensure that the feedback feature is properly implemented and visible to users in all game-over scenarios, enhancing the overall user experience and data collection capabilities of the game.
tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-feedback/game-feedback.feature
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-feedback/game-feedback.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-feedback/game-feedback.feature
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-feedback/game-feedback.feature (2)
5-5: Improve scenario title for clarityThe current title "User can send a feedback to the canceled game" has a minor grammatical issue. Consider rephrasing it for better clarity and grammar.
Apply this diff to improve the scenario title:
- Scenario: 🌟 User can send a feedback to the canceled game + Scenario: 🌟 User can send feedback for a canceled game
59-59: Improve scenario title for precisionThe current title "Game feedback can't be submitted without rating" could be more precise. Consider rephrasing it to better reflect the scenario's focus on rating-dependent submission.
Apply this diff to improve the scenario title:
- Scenario: 🌟 Game feedback can't be submitted without rating + Scenario: 🌟 Game feedback submission is dependent on rating selection
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-feedback/game-feedback.feature (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/acceptance/features/game/features/game-feedback/game-feedback.feature (5)
31-57: LGTM: Well-structured scenario for post-game feedbackThis scenario effectively covers the process of submitting feedback after a game has concluded. The steps are clear, logical, and provide a comprehensive test of the feedback submission feature in the context of a completed game.
98-115: LGTM: Comprehensive testing of feedback form closure methodsThis scenario effectively covers various ways to close the game feedback submitter, including using the escape key, close button, and clicking outside the dialog. The steps are clear and provide good coverage of user interactions for closing the feedback form.
1-115: Overall: Well-structured feature file with minor improvements neededThis feature file provides comprehensive coverage of the game feedback functionality, including scenarios for canceled games, completed games, rating-dependent submission, and various ways to close the feedback form. The scenarios are generally well-structured and logical.
A few minor improvements have been suggested:
- Grammatical corrections in scenario titles and step definitions.
- Addressing an inconsistency in the rating reset step.
- Slight rephrasing of some scenario titles for clarity and precision.
These small changes will enhance the overall quality and clarity of the acceptance tests for the game feedback feature.
21-21:⚠️ Potential issueFix grammatical error in step definition
The phrase "should match or creates" is grammatically incorrect. It should be "should match or create" to use the correct verb form.
Apply this diff to fix the grammatical error:
- Then the page should match or creates the missing snapshot with name "Game feedback" + Then the page should match or create the missing snapshot with name "Game feedback"Likely invalid or redundant comment.
93-96:⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistency when resetting the rating score
The steps suggest setting the rating's score to 5 again, but the expected results indicate that the rating has been removed. This is inconsistent with the expected outcomes.
Apply this diff to correct the step:
- When the user sets rating's score to 5 in game feedback submitter + When the user removes the rating's score in game feedback submitterThis change aligns the action with the expected results: hiding "Excellent," showing "Please choose a rating," and disabling the submit button.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests