Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix repeated sync status event sending #1376

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

AnastasiaShemyakinskaya
Copy link
Member

image

Signed-off-by: AnastasiaShemyakinskaya <shem98a@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: AnastasiaShemyakinskaya <shem98a@mail.ru>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new conditional block in the ObjectState struct's SetSyncStatusAndErr method to handle specific sync status changes. It modifies the function signatures of several methods in spaceSyncStatus to include a new parameter, currSyncStatus, enhancing status updates. New test cases ensure the implemented changes behave as expected, particularly focusing on sync status transitions and event broadcasting.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../objectstate.go Added conditional block in SetSyncStatusAndErr method to update sync status from Syncing to Synced when objectNumber is 0.
.../objectstate_test.go Introduced a new test case SetSyncStatusAndErr, syncing within TestObjectState_SetSyncStatus to validate the new sync status logic.
.../spacestatus.go Modified updateSpaceSyncStatus, isStatusNotChanged, and needToSendEvent methods to include currSyncStatus parameter and updated logic accordingly.
.../spacestatus_test.go Adjusted TestSpaceSyncStatus_updateSpaceSyncStatus with a new test case "not send not changed event" and removed certain event broadcast expectations.

Poem

In the realm of sync, where bytes align,
Updates dance in code, both pure and fine.
From Syncing to Synced, with conditions grand,
Our logic now precise, a steady hand.
Tests ensure the dance remains on track,
Our status flows as scripts do crack.
Cheers to changes, precise and true,
The sync's rhythm, renewed for you! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94a5947 and 7027c48.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/objectstate.go (1 hunks)
  • core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/objectstate_test.go (1 hunks)
  • core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go (4 hunks)
  • core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/objectstate.go (1)

82-85: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved and address the issue of repeated sync status event sending.

However, ensure that all function calls to SetSyncStatusAndErr are correctly handling the new conditional block.

Verification successful

The function SetSyncStatusAndErr is used appropriately in the codebase.

The gathered context snippets show that the function calls align with the new conditional logic. The conditions leading to these calls are appropriate, and the new logic does not introduce any unintended side effects.

  • core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go
  • core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/objectstate.go
  • core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/filestate.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `SetSyncStatusAndErr` are correctly handling the new conditional block.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new conditional block.
rg --type go $'SetSyncStatusAndErr'

Length of output: 4097


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather code snippets around each call to `SetSyncStatusAndErr` to verify handling of the new conditional block.

# Extract context around function calls in implementation files
rg --type go --context 5 'SetSyncStatusAndErr' core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/objectstate.go core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/filestate.go core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go

Length of output: 4684

core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/objectstate_test.go (1)

145-156: LGTM!

The new test case SetSyncStatusAndErr, syncing correctly verifies the functionality of the updated SetSyncStatusAndErr method.

core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go (3)

185-185: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved and address the issue of repeated sync status event sending.

However, ensure that all function calls to isStatusNotChanged are correctly handling the new parameter syncStatus.

Verification successful

Verification successful!

The function isStatusNotChanged is correctly handling the new parameter syncStatus in its single call within the codebase.

  • core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go: Verified the function call correctly passes the new parameter.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `isStatusNotChanged` are correctly handling the new parameter `syncStatus`.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new parameter.
rg --type go $'isStatusNotChanged'

Length of output: 299


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `isStatusNotChanged` across the entire codebase to ensure they handle the new parameter `syncStatus` correctly.

# Test: Search for the function usage across the entire codebase.
rg --type go 'isStatusNotChanged'

Length of output: 299


201-203: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved and address the issue of repeated sync status event sending.

However, ensure that all function calls to needToSendEvent are correctly handling the new parameter currSyncStatus.

Verification successful

Verify that all function calls to needToSendEvent are correctly handling the new parameter currSyncStatus.

The code changes appear to address the issue of repeated sync status event sending. However, ensure that all instances of needToSendEvent are correctly handling the new parameter currSyncStatus by searching for all occurrences in the codebase.


Verified: All calls to needToSendEvent correctly handle the new parameter currSyncStatus.

The code changes correctly address the issue of repeated sync status event sending, and all instances of needToSendEvent have been updated to handle the new parameter currSyncStatus.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `needToSendEvent` are correctly handling the new parameter `currSyncStatus`.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new parameter.
rg --type go $'needToSendEvent'

Length of output: 379


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all instances of the function call `needToSendEvent` in the codebase to ensure the new parameter `currSyncStatus` is correctly handled.
rg 'needToSendEvent' --type go

Length of output: 379


159-159: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved and address the issue of repeated sync status event sending.

However, ensure that all function calls to updateSpaceSyncStatus are correctly handling the new parameter currSyncStatus.

core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus_test.go (1)

485-517: LGTM!

The new test case "not send not changed event" correctly verifies that certain events are not broadcasted when conditions are met.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2024

New Coverage 46.9% of statements
Patch Coverage 100.0% of changed statements (16/16)

Coverage provided by https://github.com/seriousben/go-patch-cover-action

@AnastasiaShemyakinskaya AnastasiaShemyakinskaya merged commit cd155c5 into main Jul 10, 2024
5 checks passed
@AnastasiaShemyakinskaya AnastasiaShemyakinskaya deleted the fix-repeated-statuses branch July 10, 2024 15:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants