Wrong line count in interpreter

[pdehaye]

"telling us that the LOAD_FAST instruction appears at position zero"
->
"telling us that the LOAD_FAST instruction appears at position six"

No?

[MichaelDiBernardo]

Thanks for catching this. I think @akaptur actually meant to use the very first instruction LOAD_CONST as the example in this paragraph, so we'll correct it to refer to that instruction instead.

[pdehaye]

I think the sixth line would be more instructional, as there are several 0s on that dis.

[MichaelDiBernardo]

@pdehaye I think it's probably better to use the first instruction in the list, because it's easier to pick that one as one's eyes move from paragraph to source block. However, I think we should explicitly instruct the reader to look at the first instruction as an example.

Edit: This is now done in b9762c1

[akaptur]

LGTM. Thanks @pdehaye for the catch and @MichaelDiBernardo for the fix.