Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add AzureDatalakeStorageDeleteOperator #13206

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 24, 2020
Merged

add AzureDatalakeStorageDeleteOperator #13206

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 24, 2020

Conversation

ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds AzureDatalakeStorageDeleteOperator with example dags and system test


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

@mik-laj
Copy link
Member

mik-laj commented Dec 22, 2020

I rebased to latest master. Thanks for not pushing this change to "Astronomer/airflow", because then I wouldn't have permission.

@github-actions
Copy link

The Workflow run is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static checks,^Build docs$,^Spell check docs$,^Backport packages$,^Provider packages,^Checks: Helm tests$,^Test OpenAPI*.

@github-actions
Copy link

The Workflow run is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static checks,^Build docs$,^Spell check docs$,^Backport packages$,^Provider packages,^Checks: Helm tests$,^Test OpenAPI*.

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mik-laj , seems the tests have passed :)

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 5185d81 into apache:master Dec 24, 2020
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy deleted the datalake-delete-operator branch December 24, 2020 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants