Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove non-website stuff from website branch #243

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 16, 2018

Conversation

rdowner
Copy link
Contributor

@rdowner rdowner commented Feb 2, 2018

Note that this is a PR against website, not against master. Please bear this in mind when reviewing, and committer please merge into the correct branch :-)

See this mailing list thread for the explanation and discussion.

In short: a few months back the user guide was extracted from the Jekyll-based website tooling and converted to use GitBook. The master branch of this repo now contains the GitBook system and has removed all website files. The website branch was forked off just before the commits to implement GitBook and delete the Jekyll tooling + website content - therefore the website branch contains both the website and the outdated user guide.

This pull request removes the user guide and related scripts etc. from the website branch. This will result in master containing just the GitBook user guide, and website containing just the Jekyll website.

At this point, the generated HTML for website-root is exactly the same
as before the split, with the exception of the site map and one or two
very small differences.
Cuts out guide, Javadoc and PDF build related code and configuration.
@tbouron
Copy link
Member

tbouron commented Feb 16, 2018

Thanks @rdowner for this. Tested locally without an issue 👍

Will merge now

@asfgit asfgit merged commit 83afd19 into apache:website Feb 16, 2018
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants