Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-33523][SQL][TEST] Add predicate related benchmark to SubExprEliminationBenchmark #30476

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

viirya
Copy link
Member

@viirya viirya commented Nov 24, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch adds predicate related benchmark to SubExprEliminationBenchmark.

Why are the changes needed?

We should have a benchmark for subexpression elimination of predicate.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No, dev only.

How was this patch tested?

Run benchmark locally.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the SQL label Nov 24, 2020
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
subexpressionElimination off, codegen on 42687 42805 111 0.0 426873372.5 1.0X
subexpressionElimination off, codegen off 43606 45108 1613 0.0 436055236.3 1.0X
subexpressionElimination on, codegen on 29761 30563 704 0.0 297614324.4 1.4X
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this case, do we have only 40% improvement?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems so, it is subexpression elimination under codegen.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will submit subexpression elimination under non-codegen after this.

@SparkQA

This comment has been minimized.

@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Nov 24, 2020

retest this please

Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM Thanks @viirya

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

GA passed.
Merged to master.

@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Nov 24, 2020

Thanks @HyukjinKwon @dongjoon-hyun @maropu

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 24, 2020

Test build #131615 has finished for PR 30476 at commit 0ca10ba.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 24, 2020

Test build #131618 has finished for PR 30476 at commit 930ffe2.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 24, 2020

Test build #131613 has finished for PR 30476 at commit 7e3be61.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@viirya viirya deleted the SPARK-33523 branch December 27, 2023 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants