Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest going to the archive if workflow not found in UI #7745

Closed
alexec opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Suggest going to the archive if workflow not found in UI #7745

alexec opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@alexec
Copy link
Contributor

alexec commented Feb 3, 2022

Summary

If you deep-link into a workflow, but the workflow is deleted you are shown this:

image

Add a link to the archive to see if it could be found there.

Use Cases

When would you use this?


Message from the maintainers:

Love this enhancement proposal? Give it a 👍. We prioritise the proposals with the most 👍.

@alexec alexec added type/feature Feature request good first issue Good for newcomers area/ui labels Feb 3, 2022
@caelan-io
Copy link
Member

Thanks for creating this issue @alexec! This encapsulates issues #2890 and #5824. @JPZ13 or I will circle back once we have an ETA for this.

@isubasinghe
Copy link
Member

isubasinghe commented Feb 10, 2022

Should be done before 11pm AEDT time tomorrow.

@isubasinghe
Copy link
Member

Done, addressed comment in #5824

@alexec alexec closed this as completed in c1154ff Jun 29, 2022
LoricAndre pushed a commit to padoa/argo-workflows that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2022
…rgoproj#7854)

Signed-off-by: Isitha Subasinghe <isitha@pipekit.io>
Signed-off-by: Loric ANDRE <loric.a@padoa-group.com>
reddymh pushed a commit to reddymh/argo-workflows that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2023
…rgoproj#7854)

Signed-off-by: Isitha Subasinghe <isitha@pipekit.io>
Signed-off-by: Reddy <Rajshekar.Reddy@lowes.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants