Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update GitHub Action Versions #340

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Jun 30, 2024

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated several GitHub Actions to their latest versions for improved performance and security:
      • pozil/auto-assign-issue to v2.0.0
      • actions/checkout to v4.1.7
      • xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher to v3.0.0
      • reviewdog/action-eslint to v1.27.0
      • davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action to v2.5.0

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 30, 2024

Walkthrough

This update reflects routine maintenance on several GitHub Actions workflows by upgrading the versions of various actions. These upgrades aim to ensure compatibility, security, and access to the latest features.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue action version from v1.13.0 to v2.0.0.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml
.github/workflows/test.yml
Updated actions/checkout action to v4.1.7.
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Updated xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher action version from v2 to v3.0.0.
Updated reviewdog/action-eslint action version from v1.20.0 to v1.27.0.
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action action version from v2 to v2.5.0.

Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are always opted into early access features.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #91

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and 94b64cf.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (3)

35-35: LGTM!

The version update for actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.1.7 is appropriate. Ensure to review the changelog for any notable changes.


Line range hint 47-52: LGTM!

The version update for reviewdog/action-eslint from v1.20.0 to v1.27.0 is appropriate. Ensure to review the changelog for any notable changes and verify the compatibility of the reporter: github-pr-review option.


43-43: Major version update: xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher

The update from v2 to v3.0.0 is a major version bump. Ensure to review the release notes for any breaking changes or new features that might affect the workflow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant