Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update GitHub Action Versions #351

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Sep 15, 2024

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced auto-assign functionality for issues with the latest version of the auto-assign action.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved reliability and performance of the checkout process and linting actions with updated versions.
  • Chores

    • Updated various GitHub Actions across multiple workflows to their latest versions for better performance and stability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to several GitHub Actions workflows, primarily focusing on upgrading the versions of various actions used across multiple files. Notably, the pozil/auto-assign-issue, actions/checkout, xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher, reviewdog/action-eslint, and davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action actions have been updated to their latest versions. These changes aim to maintain the workflows by integrating the latest features, improvements, and bug fixes associated with these actions.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue from v1.13.0 to v2.0.0.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml, .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml, .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml, .github/workflows/test.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.1.7.
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Updated xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher from v2 to v3.0.0 and reviewdog/action-eslint from v1.20.0 to v1.31.0.
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action from v2 to v2.5.1.

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and e329a8c.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
.github/workflows/assign.yml (1)

9-9: LGTM!

The version update to v2.0.0 for the pozil/auto-assign-issue action looks good. It may introduce new features, improvements, or bug fixes associated with the newer version of the action, potentially enhancing the functionality of the auto-assign feature for issues in the repository.

The conditional execution remains unchanged, ensuring that the action does not run for the dependabot[bot] user, which is the desired behavior.

.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)

14-14: LGTM!

Updating the actions/checkout action to a specific version (v4.1.7) is a good practice. It ensures that the workflow uses a stable and compatible version of the action, which may include bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features.

The change maintains the functionality of the workflow while potentially enhancing its reliability and compatibility.

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (3)

35-35: LGTM!

Updating the actions/checkout action to the latest version v4.1.7 is a good practice to ensure the workflow benefits from the latest features, improvements, and bug fixes.


43-43: LGTM!

Updating the xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher action to the latest version v3.0.0 is a good practice to ensure the workflow benefits from the latest features, improvements, and bug fixes.


47-47: LGTM!

Updating the reviewdog/action-eslint action to the latest version v1.31.0 is a good practice to ensure the workflow benefits from the latest features, improvements, and bug fixes.

.github/workflows/test.yml (2)

34-34: LGTM!

The actions/checkout action has been updated to a newer minor version, which likely includes bug fixes and improvements.

Please verify that the workflow runs successfully with the updated version by monitoring the next few executions.


54-54: Looks good!

The davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action action has been updated to a newer minor version, which likely includes enhancements and fixes related to coverage reporting.

Please verify that the coverage reports are generated correctly with the updated version by checking the next few workflow runs.

.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

55-55: LGTM!

Updating the actions/checkout action to v4.1.7 is a good practice to ensure the workflow uses the latest stable version. This update may include bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features compared to the previous version v4.1.1.

The rest of the workflow remains unchanged, so the overall functionality should not be affected by this version update.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #102

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant