Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Most members of std::allocate are deprecated in C++17 #30

Conversation

DanielaE
Copy link
Contributor

Replace them by their cousins from std::allocator_traits.

Signed-off-by: Daniela Engert dani@ngrt.de

@DanielaE DanielaE force-pushed the fix/replace-deprecated-allocator-members branch from f209012 to fbb7762 Compare January 14, 2018 07:45
@DanielaE DanielaE force-pushed the fix/replace-deprecated-allocator-members branch from fbb7762 to d529a91 Compare March 13, 2018 17:17
@DanielaE DanielaE force-pushed the fix/replace-deprecated-allocator-members branch from d529a91 to d5f3a54 Compare March 30, 2018 05:20
@mloskot mloskot self-requested a review March 30, 2018 20:18
Copy link
Member

@mloskot mloskot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Replace them by their cousins from std::allocator_traits.

Signed-off-by: Daniela Engert <dani@ngrt.de>
@DanielaE DanielaE force-pushed the fix/replace-deprecated-allocator-members branch from d5f3a54 to 246ac7f Compare April 1, 2018 06:09
@mloskot
Copy link
Member

mloskot commented Apr 1, 2018

@chhenning I think you can merge it too, no?

@chhenning chhenning merged commit 74a6886 into boostorg:develop Apr 1, 2018
@DanielaE DanielaE deleted the fix/replace-deprecated-allocator-members branch April 1, 2018 16:10
@mloskot
Copy link
Member

mloskot commented May 20, 2022

This is included in the planning towards C++14/17 discussion here #676

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants