-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support ABP filter rule extensions #59
Comments
Big companies like Meta now use minified CSS, so nothing except Browser vendors and some operating system vendors are slowly moving towards aggressive blocking and blacklisting of sites that try to circumvent adblockers, so it makes sense to make support for cosmetic filters higher than |
Yep! We’re well aware of this and should have something exciting to announce soon on this point (possibly even this month).
… On May 8, 2022, at 05:54, Mika Lindqvist ***@***.***> wrote:
Big companies like Meta now use minified CSS, so nothing except :-abp-has() works for blocking the ads. They also split texts like "Sponsored" character by character with <span> elements to make it really hard to use injected JavaScript code to block the ads.
Browser vendors and some operating system vendors are slowly moving towards aggressive blocking and blacklisting of sites that try to circumvent adblockers, so it makes sense to make support for cosmetic filters higher than low priority.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
I think just about everything here is implemented already, closing |
Copied over from brave-experiments/ad-block#113
In general, there is some value in supporting ABP specific additions, more so on network rules but possibly on cosmetic rules too. Low priority but would be "nice to have"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: