Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

may be we could pass parameter to script by name #181

Closed
yosefy opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 24 comments
Closed

may be we could pass parameter to script by name #181

yosefy opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 24 comments

Comments

@yosefy
Copy link

yosefy commented Feb 13, 2019

because when there are too many it becomes pretty complicated to remember numbers

may be there is such an option?

(i can live without it... just a thought)
thanks

@bugy bugy added the feature label Feb 13, 2019
@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Feb 13, 2019

Hi @yosefy could you explain in examples, please, what do you mean?
I'm not sure which numbers you are talking about

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 13, 2019

there is a name for each parameter

{
  "name": "choose_environment",
  "param": "--env",
  "description": "Environment",
  "required": true,
  "type": "list",
  "default": "dev",
  "values": [
    "dev",
    "prod"
  ]
}

then in the script
cd "/mydir/$choose_environment/path"

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 13, 2019

insted of
cd "/mydir/$1/path"

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 13, 2019

or may be we could use the "param" without dashes as name

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Feb 13, 2019

To be honest I'm confused. How are you using "param": "--env",?
And I guess in your example, you should reference the variable by $2 and not $1, right?
(I'm asking because I don't really understand the example).

But in general, as far as I understand, you would like that Script server will create environment variables based on parameters (and their) and pass them to a script, is it correct?
I think it would be possible, with replacing of unsupported characters (e.g. spaces)

Also Script server is based on the vision, that nobody will have a need to adjust their scripts for Script server :) And with this variables, your script would be almost unusable outside of Script server
Though for me this is not a problem. If you would like to adjust your script, it shouldn't be discouraged

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 13, 2019

actually i am building my scripts for script-server in my case
so i think the best would be to turn

--test to "TEST"
--simple-bool to "SIMPLE_BOOL" and pass to script
(everything not a-z will turn to "_" )
then inside the script we don't have to remember what ${78} means :)

i think may be "param" is best candidate for the var name because it cant have spaces in it anyway
and if there is no param, no var

so that way scripts can continue running without script-server and still be logically connected to this way

may be you have better idea?

but again it is only for improvement. i am happy with script server anyway :)

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Feb 13, 2019

I would use parameter name instead, because "param" should be used in a diferent manner (and it could be a single letter in a lot of cases).

But are you using "param" in your scripts at all? If you access parameters by index, then you don't need it.
I'm referring to this approach of using param: https://stackoverflow.com/a/14203146/2166673

Anyway, the idea itself makes sense

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 13, 2019

amm i don't use it like this in this case (mostly using script server with ansible and terraform and packer for now)
about param you are right it is single latter sometimes
not sure need to add more fields put ok too
may be "name" is good candidate?

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Feb 13, 2019

Name should be ok.

amm i don't use it like this in this case

But then you can skip specifying param all the time. It's not required :)

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 13, 2019

yes i know but still you have to remember what is this $4 (or was it $3??) you see in the script
instead of $MEANINGFULL_NAME

example from real life :)

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Feb 13, 2019

I agree with you, the whole ticket makes perfect sense.

By the way, why don't you set variables at the beginning of the script? It will make your life a little bit easier, I guess. Example:

#!/bin/bash

environment="$1"
user="$2"
command="$3"

cd "/mydir/$environment/path"

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 13, 2019

well also an option :)

also to let you know
in ansible there is -e (external var) option, which you may add more then once
so in script-server this -e flags adds itself when the var is defined together with var(very useful!)

it solves many problems of not knowing the exact amount of vars that will be there in the end

so just wanted to thanks for that :)

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 25, 2019

so another reason:

terraform apply -var "env=dev" -var "app=test" -var "size=6"

and i don't know how many there will be as they come from dynamically included config files for example

so, if "app" is not required and not set, then "size" will move from $6 to $4
and it may cause disaster :)

same with running ansible with multiple -e option or any other software of this type

so if we only use it with terraform command , then ok, we just add them all
BUT if in a script i wan't to run some other checks for example then i need to know the exact index
of the variable

so here turning name to ENV VAR as you suggested may fix the situation completely

thanks

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 25, 2019

ok after trying all day :) need help
i want to do this
terraform apply $@
and that shoud do:
terraform apply -var env=dev -var app=test -var size=6 -var last_unknown=x

but i don't i can't find a way to do it
if i add param: "-var env="
then i get -var env= prod (with space)

@bugy , may be you have some idea?
thanks

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Feb 25, 2019

Hi @yosefy, this is not possible, unfortunately. So as usual, my proposal would be some wrapping script. Which will read "normal" parameters and adapt them to the terraform syntax

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Feb 25, 2019 via email

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Feb 25, 2019

Ok, if you would need help with it, I'd be glad to help

@muzzol
Copy link

muzzol commented May 17, 2019

I would like to resurface this issue as I'm using lot of scripts that uses environment variables to perform diferent operations. A very simple example:

SERVER_TYPE="prod" /opt/scripts/list-users.sh -a some -b params
I know I could use positional parameters, but I don't have always the same number of arguments so it can be very dificult to predict every combination.
With variables is very easy to do that.

There's a webmin plugin that handles that very well, you can specify any order an number of variables and you can construct the call to script in any way you want. Then you fill the variables with any value you want.

Here you can take a look:

webmin

what do you think about it?

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented May 17, 2019

Hi @muzzol, to be honest I never worked with webmin and not sure, what does this plugin do.

But in general is the idea is to pass parameters to scripts as environment variables, right? I.e. if you have parameters "Your name" and "Your password". In the script you would expect them to be available in $YOUR_NAME and $YOUR_PASSWORD env variables, right?

@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented May 17, 2019 via email

@muzzol
Copy link

muzzol commented May 19, 2019

Hi @muzzol, to be honest I never worked with webmin and not sure, what does this plugin do.

But in general is the idea is to pass parameters to scripts as environment variables, right?

yes, that's it.
for me the main concern is that lot of daily scripts don't have a fixed number of params. sometimes you can call a script with just one and the next time you call it with 8.
in addition to that, we also have scripts that react different depending on environment like in the first example I provided (SERVER_TYPE="prod")

maybe you could make a new parameter configuration, Environment Variable, that transforms that value in a variable just before script execution:

    {
      "name": "Multiple selection",
      "description": "Multiselect list",
      "type": "multiselect",
      "param": "SERVER_TYPE",
      "environment": true,
      "values": [
        "prod",
        "pre",
        "dev",
        "qua"
      ]
    },

this would be something like:

SERVER_TYPE="prod" /opt/test.sh

and if you want a variable from the whole environment you could use your ENV_ prefix trick.

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Dec 25, 2019

Done. By default all parameters are mapped to PARAM_{uppercase name}, for example:
id -> PARAM_ID
Server Type -> PARAM_SERVER_TYPE

All whitespaces and special characters are replaced to a single underscore (_), e.g.:
hello !@#$%^& world -> PARAM_HELLO_WORLD

All non-ascii letters are tried to be transliterated, e.g.:
ῥυθμος -> PARAM_RYTHMOS

Buuut, if you want to be explicit, you can set a variable name yourself, using env_var field, e.g.:

{
      "name": "Required Text",
      "required": true,
      "param": "--required_text",
      "env_var": "Req_Text"
}

In this case the name will be exactly Req_Text and no transformations will be performed (even if the name is not supported).

The following parameters will not be set as env variables:

  1. Empty values
  2. List values ("type": "multiselect" and "multiple_arguments": true)
  3. Non-ascii parameter names and if transliteration is not supported, e.g. japanese
  4. no_value parameters, if the value is false
  5. Parameters with a duplicated variable name (either copypasted env_var or name normalization is the same (e.g. Param ε and Param η are both resolved to PARAM_E)

PS this will be available in the dev build, and the new admin page already supports env_var

@bugy
Copy link
Owner

bugy commented Dec 25, 2019

@Nottt FYI

@bugy bugy added the resolved label Dec 25, 2019
@bugy bugy added this to the 1.15.0 milestone Dec 25, 2019
@yosefy
Copy link
Author

yosefy commented Dec 25, 2019 via email

@bugy bugy closed this as completed Feb 1, 2020
antonellocaroli pushed a commit to antonellocaroli/script-server that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants