-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add public transport information in waypoints (accesses) listing #1067
Comments
Any progress on this ? |
nope ... |
Hey! |
Isola 2000 😍 (a bit of chauvinism, sorry) @eddy-geek Understood, so does it mean {
"documents": [
{
"document_id": 1055792,
"version": 1,
"locales": [ ... ],
"geometry": {...},
.....
"areas": [],
"waypoints": [
{
"document_id": 14274,
"version": 11,
"locales": [...],
"public_transportation_rating": "good service"
},
{
"document_id": 14275,
"version": 11,
"locales": [...],
"public_transportation_rating": "no service"
},
]
? |
Hello ! From my point of view, the needs behind this feature are:
I'm not sure giving back all the waypoints is a good way to fulfill these needs. I've seen that waypoints have a computed value ( Some suggestions:
|
Sorry, I missed this discussion before answering to the PR made for the frontend. I made a mistake with the title of the issue. Indeed the idea is to have the Having this information for routes could be interesting too, but it's another subject. |
There is no other issue open about having this information into routes, I think that's a very nice feature to have 🙂 |
…fo-waypoints-listing feat: #1067 add public transport information in waypoints listing
@brunobesson the mistake has been made, now the whole discussion here is about routes, so can we reopen and keep original title? I like @florentcadot's idea for the API extension, having basic waypoint information on routes (just location+rating, and only for access points) seems to add quite some flexibility, for example to enable better display of the results. |
See #c2corg/c2c_ui#846
Field
public_transportation_rating
should be included. I assume we do not need thepublic_transportation_types
field.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: