-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 615
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add lfx 2024 Term 1 #1081
Add lfx 2024 Term 1 #1081
Conversation
@Riaankl I think this addresses your concern in #1070 (comment). |
- updating dates based on issue feedback - adding 2024 label, updating term 1 label Signed-off-by: Nate W <natew@cncf.io>
d08b00d
to
284a934
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
LGTM |
- Description: | ||
- Expected Outcome: | ||
- Recommended Skills: | ||
- Mentor(s): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nate-double-u Remember our discussion about having 2 mentors at least? We said that for GSoC. Do you want to go that route here too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's bring this up at the next Mentoring WG meeting.
My sense is that multiple mentors are not as needed in the LFX program. GSoC is much more strict than LFX for it's deadlines. That said, it would be good to go through and see who has been late with evals in LFX and why -- we have a pretty good record of it.
We can open a follow up PR if needed.
Resolves #1070
deploy preview: