camerad: debayer in the IFE #33720
Draft
camerad: debayer in the IFE #33720
+898
−60
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
adeebshihadeh
force-pushed
the
just-ife
branch
from
aefc092
to
cd62772
Compare
adeebshihadeh
force-pushed
the
just-ife
branch
from
8d9a9e2
to
8175351
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#33612 attempts to move the full image processing pipeline into the ISP; this is split out from there and only moves the debayer. No ICP or any new ISP HW is brought up for this.
Saves 170mW per camera, plus the GPU time.