Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does eccodes really need perl? #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2016
Merged

Does eccodes really need perl? #9

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2016

Conversation

pelson
Copy link
Member

@pelson pelson commented Jun 5, 2016

No description provided.

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@pelson pelson mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2016
@kmuehlbauer
Copy link
Contributor

@pelson eccodes has one test, which uses a perl script to compare two result files. If we are sure that this test will actually run OK, than we could just skip this particular test.

@pelson
Copy link
Member Author

pelson commented Jun 5, 2016

Thanks @kmuehlbauer. If it needs it, then we should keep it as a dependency. I'll put forward a PR which fixes the pinning.

Thanks,

@pelson
Copy link
Member Author

pelson commented Jun 5, 2016

Let's see how that does.

@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ conda install --yes conda-build
conda info

# Embarking on 1 case(s).
set -x
export CONDA_PERL=5.20.3.1
set +x
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need the set +/- x here? Or they are debug leftovers?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comes out of these lines in conda-smithy. Given it is just setting environment variable maybe these are not needed.

kmuehlbauer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2016
MNT: Re-render the feedstock

Merging, as we have green lights in #9.
@pelson
Copy link
Member Author

pelson commented Jun 27, 2016

Checks are green. I think we either merge or close. I'm happy either way, but don't want to drag out the PR.

Thanks!

@ocefpaf ocefpaf merged commit 420687d into conda-forge:master Jun 27, 2016
@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member

ocefpaf commented Jun 27, 2016

We just lost this one under the radar. Thanks from bringing it back.

@pelson
Copy link
Member Author

pelson commented Jun 27, 2016

We just lost this one under the radar. Thanks from bringing it back.

I have plenty of those 😄

@pelson pelson deleted the perl branch June 27, 2016 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants