Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: value renderer for timestamp protos #12860
feat: value renderer for timestamp protos #12860
Changes from all commits
00ee180
9915821
836d395
c5b4f76
4c1b5bb
469c4f8
b317220
9501781
48fd2d0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you use the tests from https://github.com/cosmos/cosmjs/pull/1147/files#diff-1aee49f4f44f595fc5e4c8a2f0e15fce0b30fab5ea6e9e8f1b2894a917b19fa5?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done. Dropped a duplicate and also dropped the out-of-range tests, as the straightforward Go implementation doesn't return errors for those cases. It looks like the underlying Go library is able to tolerate slightly out-of-spec inputs, and that shouldn't be an error, IMHO.