Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(client/v2): correctly handle enhanced sub commands #21809

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

johnletey
Copy link
Contributor

@johnletey johnletey commented Sep 18, 2024

Description

When attempting to enhance sub commands, AutoCLI would be adding two sub commands to the main command.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced command-line interface by selectively adding commands based on specific conditions, improving user control over available commands.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Resolved issues with command registration, ensuring that only appropriate commands are displayed based on enhancement settings.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce conditional checks in the AddMsgServiceCommands and AddQueryServiceCommands functions. These checks determine whether to add commands to their respective parent commands based on the EnhanceCustomCommand property of the command descriptor. This modification alters the command registration process by selectively including commands, thus potentially limiting the commands available in the command-line interface.

Changes

Files Change Summary
client/v2/autocli/msg.go, client/v2/autocli/query.go Introduced conditional checks in AddMsgServiceCommands and AddQueryServiceCommands to add commands based on EnhanceCustomCommand.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI
    participant CommandDescriptor

    User->>CLI: Request command
    CLI->>CommandDescriptor: Check EnhanceCustomCommand
    alt EnhanceCustomCommand is false
        CLI->>CLI: Add command to parent
    else EnhanceCustomCommand is true
        CLI->>CLI: Do not add command
    end
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53f5842 and 0969e1e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • client/v2/autocli/msg.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • client/v2/autocli/msg.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the C:CLI label Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
client/v2/autocli/query.go (1)

56-58: Conditional check for adding subcommands based on EnhanceCustomCommand flag.

The introduced conditional check allows for selective inclusion of subcommands based on the EnhanceCustomCommand property. If EnhanceCustomCommand is true, the subcommand will not be automatically added to the command. This change provides more control over the CLI commands and allows for customization.

Consider adding a comment to clarify the intention behind the EnhanceCustomCommand flag and its impact on command registration.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01212de and 53f5842.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • client/v2/autocli/msg.go (1 hunks)
  • client/v2/autocli/query.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
client/v2/autocli/query.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

client/v2/autocli/msg.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Additional comments not posted (1)
client/v2/autocli/query.go (1)

Line range hint 1-200: Code conforms to the Uber Golang style guide.

The Golang code follows the naming conventions, formatting, and code structure recommended by the Uber Golang style guide. The package naming and import grouping adhere to the guidelines. The code also follows the recommended error handling and return practices.

Comment on lines 61 to 63
if !subCmdDesc.EnhanceCustomCommand {
cmd.AddCommand(subCmd)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The conditional check alters the command registration behavior.

This change introduces a gate that conditionally adds the subCmd to the parent cmd based on the EnhanceCustomCommand property of the subCmdDesc descriptor. Commands will only be included if EnhanceCustomCommand is false.

Consider adding documentation or comments to clarify:

  • The purpose and effect of the EnhanceCustomCommand property.
  • How this change impacts the CLI user experience, as certain commands may not be available based on this setting.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title fix: correctly handle enhanced sub commands fix(client/v2): correctly handle enhanced sub commands Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we add a comment on this? This makes sense to respect the EnhanceCustomCommand on subcommands too but let's be explicit with a comment.
Any way we could capture this in a test? (see query_test.go)

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added backport/v0.50.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.50's next stable release backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release labels Sep 18, 2024
@johnletey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should I work on this, or @JulianToledano?

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

Should I work on this, or @JulianToledano?

You can do it if you can. Assignees are for PR reviews. If you can't, then we'll do it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.50.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.50's next stable release backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release C:CLI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants