Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: set previous share to nil for excluded pools #120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2022
Merged

Conversation

kingcre
Copy link
Contributor

@kingcre kingcre commented Nov 18, 2022

Description

This PR fixes a bug when recording previous share, which was not setting previous share to nil when pools are excluded from the rewards allocation.

Tasks

  • Fix the bug
  • Write tests

References


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Targeted PR against correct branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

@kingcre kingcre self-assigned this Nov 18, 2022
@kingcre kingcre marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2022 06:45
Copy link
Contributor

@queencre queencre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@queencre queencre merged commit cea60c4 into main Nov 18, 2022
@kingcre kingcre deleted the fix-previous-share branch August 1, 2023 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants