Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: panic on invalid elasticity_multiplier #1397

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

mmsqe
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmsqe mmsqe commented Apr 19, 2024

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

  • Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
  • Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
  • Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
  • Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
  • Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
  • Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
  • Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
  • Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
  • If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
  • If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
  • If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
  • If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
  • If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed a potential issue in the RPC module to prevent system crashes on invalid input parameters.
  • New Features
    • Updated the upgrade process in integration tests to support newer versions with enhanced sequence handling.
  • Refactor
    • Modified internal logic for sender address retrieval to improve reliability and accuracy.
  • Documentation
    • Updated the project's change log for better tracking of modifications.
  • Dependencies
    • Upgraded external module versions to enhance system compatibility and performance.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 19, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The latest updates involve crucial bug fixes and enhancements across various modules. Key changes include a fix for potential panics in the rpc module, updates to dependency versions, and improvements in transaction handling and upgrade processes in test and application code. The changes aim to enhance stability, security, and performance of the system.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md, app/app.go, x/cronos/rpc/api.go, x/cronos/keeper/grpc_query.go Updated handling of parameters and methods to improve reliability and compatibility with new versions.
gomod2nix.toml Updated module version and hash for "github.com/evmos/ethermint".
integration_tests/test_upgrade.py Restructured the upgrade process with new steps and sequence adjustments for versions 1.1.0, 1.2, and 1.3.

Poem

🌟 A Whimsical Code Update 🌟

In the land of code, where the bits frolic,
A rabbit hopped, fixing the logic.
With a twitch of the nose, and a swift paw swipe,
Bugs flee, and features grip tight.
Oh, how the digital meadows thrive,
With each update, our code comes alive!
🐇💻🌱


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mmsqe mmsqe marked this pull request as ready for review April 19, 2024 02:21
@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from a team as a code owner April 19, 2024 02:21
@mmsqe mmsqe requested review from leejw51crypto, thomas-nguy and yihuang and removed request for a team April 19, 2024 02:21
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.31%. Comparing base (39a0261) to head (3a4fb2b).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1397       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   15.35%   35.31%   +19.96%     
===========================================
  Files          75      124       +49     
  Lines        4925     9458     +4533     
===========================================
+ Hits          756     3340     +2584     
- Misses       4094     5759     +1665     
- Partials       75      359      +284     
Files Coverage Δ
x/cronos/keeper/grpc_query.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/cronos/rpc/api.go 0.48% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 70 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants