Fix Range#size return type to Int32
#14588
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
straight-shoota
added
kind:bug
|
Hm, actually this can overflow on ranges of |
|
I'm afraid there's no good solution here. The good part of raising on overflow is that if it fits, it works. The bad part is that the failure is at runtime... An alternative, as good or bad, is to statically fail on > Int32 types and have people do the math themselves 🤷 |
straight-shoota
changed the title
Rang#size return type to Int32Range#size return type to Int32
beta-ziliani
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #14587
The
superimplementationEnumerable#sizehas the same type restriction already.See also #13648 (comment)