Removal of deprecated code and renamed the old formats to transformers.

[bodiam]

No description provided.

[bodiam]

@snuyanzin I've commented out some code related to testing nested JSON, since it was using the old Format class. What would be the best way to proceed here?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #698 (e5c7f78) into main (ad9f575) will increase coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #698      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     92.50%   92.74%   +0.23%     
+ Complexity     2603     2562      -41     
============================================
  Files           283      280       -3     
  Lines          5295     5042     -253     
  Branches        568      524      -44     
============================================
- Hits           4898     4676     -222     
+ Misses          251      234      -17     
+ Partials        146      132      -14     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ain/java/net/datafaker/providers/base/Address.java	97.14% <ø> (ø)
...n/java/net/datafaker/providers/base/BaseFaker.java	90.99% <ø> (+3.16%)	⬆️
...ain/java/net/datafaker/providers/base/Disease.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ker/idnumbers/pt/br/IdNumberGeneratorPtBrUtil.java	96.29% <0.00%> (+3.70%)	⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[snuyanzin]

currently there are some cases supported by deprecated code and not supported by transformers...
So first i would support them and then it could be removed.

e.g. for Json @RVRhub submitted #693
so then need also support for xml

now with #699 json could be removed

[bodiam]

currently there are some cases supported by deprecated code and not supported by transformers... So first i would support them and then it could be removed.

e.g. for Json @RVRhub submitted #693 so then need also support for xml

now with #699 json could be removed

oki, in that case, I'll redo this PR, but won't touch the transformation classes.