Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Negative interest invariance check #1680

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

slundqui
Copy link
Contributor

Adding invariance check to ensure no negative interest between subsequent calls of invariance checks.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.68421% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.30%. Comparing base (8a4d151) to head (a938873).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/agent0/hyperfuzz/system_fuzz/invariant_checks.py 73.68% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1680      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.73%   82.30%   +0.57%     
==========================================
  Files          99       99              
  Lines        7565     7584      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         6183     6242      +59     
+ Misses       1382     1342      -40     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 82.30% <73.68%> (+0.57%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@slundqui slundqui merged commit 3cd8bcd into delvtech:main Sep 11, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@slundqui slundqui deleted the negative-interest-invariance-check branch September 11, 2024 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants