[wasm][debugger] Fix method overload resolution for arguments of type array in debugger's eval

[thaystg]

In the EvaluateObjectByNonIntLocals test we were trying to evaluate an expression like this s[arr].
We are trying to call get_Item method that expects an object as a parameter and this is not correct.
With the PR we are calling the get_Item that expects an array as a parameter .

Error on CI:
https://helixre107v0xdcypoyl9e7f.blob.core.windows.net/dotnet-runtime-refs-pull-97752-merge-dc23193aa5e44908bf/chrome-DebuggerTests.EvaluateOnCallFrameTests/1/console.e4d5ccf7.log?helixlogtype=result

Error message:
Unexpected runtime error/warning message detected: console.error: [MONO] * Assertion at /__w/1/s/src/mono/mono/component/debugger-agent.c:2018, condition ' not met`

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @thaystg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

Fix assertion on CI

Author:	thaystg
Assignees:	-
Labels:	area-Debugger-mono
Milestone:	-

[radical]

@thaystg just curious - how did this break, and why didn't it get caught by CI on a PR?

[thaystg]

The test was passing on CI. But there was an assertion in the log. And Pavel asked me to take a look.

[radical]

Is the link that you shared not from the same thing, as it shows a test failure?

Also, we have https://github.com/radical/runtime/blob/2d999cb443cb85d882a6dbfe9144178d70c6fbf3/src/mono/browser/debugger/DebuggerTestSuite/Inspector.cs#L269-L277 to catch any assertions that might get missed. Would that be usable here?

[radical]

oh lol it did Unexpected runtime error/warning message detected: - that should have failed on the PR's CI then.

[thaystg]

I remembered that you did it.
But it looks like it's not always catching it? Or something it was not always asserting. Locally I was able to reproduce 100% of my runs. maybe it was reading an information that was "valid" depending on the run.

[radical]

Interesting. Maybe the format of the string different or something. Something to keep an eye out in the future I guess. thanks for the explanations!